General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWow, Joe Scar actually discussed the Piketty book today on Morning Joe.
Last edited Tue Apr 22, 2014, 11:32 AM - Edit history (1)
The 8 am re-run of it cut off the end where Joe proclaims his disgust for the unequal tax rate between the rich and everyone else. Uh-huh. Steve Rattner brought his charts which clarified the unequal spread of wealth in our country vs. the U.K. and other European countries and Sweden, then looking at inequality in China and India.
I was wondering when that show was going to discuss what everyone else has been discussing for a long time. But with Piketty's book now being a best seller at Amazon, MJ could no longer ignore the issues he raises.
Rattner pretty effectively shot down Michael Steele. Mika said practically nothing of real substance. Willy Geist was worse than useless.
Bottom line: Joe favors a "minimum tax rate on everybody" which even Steele correctly identified as a flat tax.
You gotta do better than that, Joe...
Here's the discussion http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe
JEFF9K
(1,935 posts)... what's more Republican than THAT?
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)He blusters around his ignorance and it shows...
malaise
(269,103 posts)Gidney N Cloyd
(19,843 posts)This was right at the end of the segment in the third hour.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)"getting a check." There was more in the segment that broke it down a bit for viewers who may not know what the whole debate is about. Joe was trying to stir the pot with his question to Rattner but Rattner got right back on it and made some excellent points. I got the feeling that Joe was forced into this discussion by the producers because he's been essentially IGNORING the Picketty book and now he can't any more. It's too important and too well publicized for a show like Morning Joe to ignore. It makes the show look out of touch with what is going on.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,843 posts)I checked it out here: http://www.moneychimp.com/features/tax_brackets.htm and, at least for federal income tax, a 500K salary would put you in the 39% bracket with an effective rate closer to 31%.
Ignoring for the moment the unliklihood of someone earning 500K a year not having a good deal of adjustments, Rattner's number still seems way wrong.
Did the re-run version chop out some clarification?
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)500K a year. I think Joe was making a point about state and city taxes in NY and NYC, the way we have state income tax AND a city tax on property here in New Haven.
Ghost of Tom Joad
(1,355 posts)how he got that job I'll never know.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)IOW, he was born on 3rd base and thought he'd hit a triple, as the saying goes...
pa28
(6,145 posts)Since they can't attack the facts I'm guessing they'll eventually settle on attacking Picketty himself. He is FRENCH after all.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)I don't think Joe understands that charts and algebra is what economists DO. Joe likes to denigrate "economists with all their charts," like the know-nothing he is. Joe assumes all of us are ignoramuses like him and he brags about sleeping through his college econ classes yet wins debates with Paul Krugman. unbelievable...
Mz Pip
(27,452 posts)That seems to be how they are framing their criticism of the book. Which more than likely none of them have read. Well, maybe the cover page. Maybe.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)Thomas Piketty, a French economist who talks about what he calls "Patrimonial capitalism." His main point is that we are drifting right back to the Gilded Age or worse, an oligarchy where a small number of rich families control a huge portion of the wealth, to the detriment of the rest of society.