General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMonday Toons
ACARancher
GOP
Corporations
Education
Climate
Trump
Rush
Putin
War
RIP
madokie
(51,076 posts)nothing like a big ass smile to start the day off right
scarletlib
(3,418 posts)I really appreciate and enjoy these cartoons you post during the week. Thank you for taking the time to do this for us all. Nothing gets to the heart of an issue like a good cartoon.
planetc
(7,833 posts)CherokeeDem
(3,709 posts)Love these... great toons!
TlalocW
(15,391 posts)I've always wanted to get a good tax guy to do my taxes the regular way and then treat me as a corporation and see what tax breaks, etc. I would get just as an experiment. If the experiment showed a lot of tax advantage, then I think it would be a good way to protest Citizens United because if corporations are people then by simple logic, people ARE corporations, and I think it would be an effective method of protest if more and more people filed as corporations.
Of course, I'm ignorant of the exact wording of Citizens United, which I'm sure isn't, "Corporations are people," so it probably wouldn't work.
TlalocW
eppur_se_muova
(36,289 posts)Gothmog
(145,554 posts)hedgehog
(36,286 posts)n2doc
(47,953 posts)And being a general doofus.
The Blue Flower
(5,444 posts)Does anyone know what specific corporate actions the quotation refers to? Also, I love the pecs on the Easter Putin.
Hekate
(90,793 posts)The East India Company was one such, incorporated in 1600. Then as now, money talked, and very loudly.
Sorry I can't be more specific, but you can start with that.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/176643/East-India-Company
East India Company, also called English East India Company, formally (16001708) Governor and Company of Merchants of London Trading into the East Indies, or (17081873) United Company of Merchants of England Trading to the East Indies, East India House [Credit: City of London Libraries and Guildhall Art Gallery/Heritage-Images]English company formed for the exploitation of trade with East and Southeast Asia and India, incorporated by royal charter on December 31, 1600. Starting as a monopolistic trading body, the company became involved in politics and acted as an agent of British imperialism in India from the early 18th century to the mid-19th century. In addition, the activities of the company in China in the 19th century served as a catalyst for the expansion of British influence there.
The company was formed to share in the East Indian spice trade. This trade had been a monopoly of Spain and Portugal until the defeat of the Spanish Armada (1588) by England gave the English the chance to break the monopoly. Until 1612 the company conducted separate voyages, separately subscribed. There were temporary joint stocks until 1657, when a permanent joint stock was raised. >snip<
mountain grammy
(26,648 posts)erpowers
(9,350 posts)Some people have been making money about the Boston Strong thing, but the guys who first came up with the idea have given most, if not all, of their profits to efforts to help victims of the Boston bombings. It seems one of their problems may be that they did not copyright the term Boston Strong and still are not trying to copyright the term. If they would copyright the term, people would not be able to profit from the term.
kick
Hekate
(90,793 posts)so that others may have a look