Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sarisataka

(18,769 posts)
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 12:38 AM Apr 2014

Armed robber was never told to report to prison

ST. LOUIS (AP) — After he was convicted of armed robbery in 2000, Cornealious Anderson was sentenced to 13 years behind bars and told to await instructions on when and where to report to prison. But those instructions never came.

So Anderson didn't report. He spent the next 13 years turning his life around — getting married, raising three kids, learning a trade. He made no effort to conceal his identity or whereabouts. Anderson paid taxes and traffic tickets, renewed his driver's license and registered his businesses.

Not until last year did the Missouri Department of Corrections discover the clerical error that kept him free. Now he's fighting for release, saying authorities missed their chance to incarcerate him.
http://news.yahoo.com/armed-robber-never-told-report-prison-195146743.html
... oops

Still it is ridiculous to take a man who by any measure is a rehabilitation success story and put him behind bars to cover a clerical mistake.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Armed robber was never told to report to prison (Original Post) sarisataka Apr 2014 OP
I Agree, Sir: Commutation Is In Order The Magistrate Apr 2014 #1
completely agree steve2470 Apr 2014 #8
I believe a statutes of limitations argument could be successfully argued. joshcryer Apr 2014 #9
Statute of limitations limits the time he can be charged. Angleae Apr 2014 #15
It would appear he's rehabilitated. herding cats Apr 2014 #2
Done got rehabilitated without costing the state a nickel Brother Buzz Apr 2014 #3
Essentially he served his sentence already. JimDandy Apr 2014 #4
I see it that way, too. 1000words Apr 2014 #5
That's a fascinating way to look at it. joshcryer Apr 2014 #10
For 13 years?! DiverDave Apr 2014 #18
Yeah! But I meant it was in his head. joshcryer Apr 2014 #19
Ah, sorry... DiverDave Apr 2014 #20
Hope so too. joshcryer Apr 2014 #21
Very true! nt Live and Learn Apr 2014 #13
agreed he should not have to report. waiting to see how this plays out. nt littlewolf Apr 2014 #6
This man's rehabilitation is a *great* success story. AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #7
That's a damn fine lawyer, even if the gambit doesn't work. joshcryer Apr 2014 #11
13 years at $200 per day will cost MO taxpayers $949,000. Downwinder Apr 2014 #12
Yup Victor_c3 Apr 2014 #14
His story was featured on "This American Life". Javaman Apr 2014 #16
I didn't see where it said that all of the money... NCTraveler Apr 2014 #17
Is there a statute of limitations on his offence? N.T. Donald Ian Rankin Apr 2014 #22

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
8. completely agree
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 03:32 AM
Apr 2014

The only conceivable reason to incarcerate him now would be to exact vengeance, which I think would be illogical and unjust.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
9. I believe a statutes of limitations argument could be successfully argued.
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 03:40 AM
Apr 2014

Though it will be difficult because the justice system pretty much ignores clerical errors as relevant to a defense.

Might need to get the governor involved.

Angleae

(4,493 posts)
15. Statute of limitations limits the time he can be charged.
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 06:26 AM
Apr 2014

He had already been charges, found guilty, and sentanced so the statute of limitations does not apply.

herding cats

(19,567 posts)
2. It would appear he's rehabilitated.
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 01:00 AM
Apr 2014

Which, in theory in a perfect vision of our justice system, is the reason for sending criminals to in the first place.

It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. Is our justice system about punishing a rehabilitated person after a clerical error has been found to leave him free in society for 13 socially productive years of his life? Or is it about punishment no matter what?

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
4. Essentially he served his sentence already.
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 01:11 AM
Apr 2014

He stayed in the area waiting for the order to report and therefore was not free to make life choices available to those who were not detained in such a manner. His area of detention was larger than a prison but the broad effect was somewhat similar. Of course the state wants the full measure for their mistake, though.

 

1000words

(7,051 posts)
5. I see it that way, too.
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 01:19 AM
Apr 2014

For 13 years, he remained in full compliance of the instructions given to him. Time served.

DiverDave

(4,886 posts)
18. For 13 years?!
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 12:35 PM
Apr 2014

He had a ankle bracelet?
With all he's done to be a productive part of society AND having to put up with a ankle weight?
Not that that equals a prison sentience, but don't they put that on so they can know where you are?
Someone needs to be fired for losing him, and someone else should be fired for trying to have him pay for their mistake.
I think he has paid for his crime, let the guy live his life.


I dated a girl that got her car title from the bank with a year and change left on her loan.
The bank tried to get her to send it back, she refused.
No lien title, no loan. She kept the car and saved some money because someone at 1st national screwed up.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
19. Yeah! But I meant it was in his head.
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 02:57 PM
Apr 2014

His lawyer informed him he couldn't leave the area, could not even change his address. He followed his advice and led a productive life.

DiverDave

(4,886 posts)
20. Ah, sorry...
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 03:00 PM
Apr 2014

but I still feel he should be released.
I'm still waiting for my bank to send me the title...
A guy can hope, eh?

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
7. This man's rehabilitation is a *great* success story.
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 03:30 AM
Apr 2014

And the MDC better not fuck this up, either. This guy doesn't deserve prison now; IMHO, he's already more than made up for it!

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
11. That's a damn fine lawyer, even if the gambit doesn't work.
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 03:46 AM
Apr 2014

It was the right advice to give. It was the just advice to give.

Love his FAQ page: http://patrickmichaelmegaro.com/faq

Best of luck to Anderson. I think he has a chance to get this thrown out.

Victor_c3

(3,557 posts)
14. Yup
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 06:10 AM
Apr 2014

Instead of costing the state nearly $1 million, he worked, paid taxes, and contributed to our society.

The state messed up and dropped the ball on this one. He proved for 13 years that he isn't a criminal anymore.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
17. I didn't see where it said that all of the money...
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 12:32 PM
Apr 2014

from the armed robbery was recovered. I am guessing it was. If it wasn't, restitution should still occur. He sure as hell shouldn't go to jail. If restitution is necessary, maybe it is the state that should pay it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Armed robber was never to...