regardless of what anyone in the media says....

[spanone]

NO ONE can predict what the supremes will rule. NO ONE.

all the punditry in the world will not sway the justices one iota.

[KansDem]

1. "...all the punditry in the world will not sway the justices one iota."

No, but ALEC can. If you want to know how the SCOTUS will rule, give them a call...

[Taverner]

2. In fact, I would not be surprised if those seeming most skeptical might vote "yes"

If you have already made up your mind, you wouldn't appear skeptical.

[Mr.Turnip]

5. Roberts and Kennedy are entirely up in the air right now.

They at the end of the day seemed to be Skeptical to both sides and had sympathy's with both sides.

[BlueDemKev]

8. They were far, FAR more skeptical of the govt's argument.....

....the only "concern" either of them had was a passing comment to the fact that uninsured folks MIGHT affect the pocketbooks of insured folks. Judge Vinson (FL) who ruled the entire law unconstitutional last year expressed similar concerns as well. But that didn't persuade him to abandon his "anti-federal govt" stance.

[nadinbrzezinski]

3. Yup

[BlueDemKev]

4. No, but if it's very dark and cloudy outside.....

....the chances are it's going to rain. Of course NO ONE can predict that with certainty.

Based on the questions asked by every single one of the conservative justices, it appears the Affordable Care Act is in deep trouble of being overturned or at the very least, severely-gutted.

[spanone]

6. you didn't think they would ask hard questions? deep trouble? i'll wait till they rule.

[BlueDemKev]

7. Hard questions of BOTH sides, yes.....

...however, the conservative justices appeared to only throw hard questions at the government's side.

[EFerrari]

9. No matter what one thinks of the health insurance bill

today is not the day to suddenly start trusting CNN or the rest of the corporate media, imo.

[daleanime]

10. Right!

And to continue pushing for real solutions.