General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInflation promotes wealth equality. "Price stability" safeguards inequality
That is not theory or prediction. It is observation. Nobody *likes* prices of things we buy going up, but there are reasons that the defeat of inflation in the Reagan era ushered in the generation of working people getting it hard in the neck.
Inflation inflates commodities and deflates money. Rich people are rich today and inflation erodes their existing piles of money.
Labor, however, is a commodity, the same as gold or oil or land, and working is a hedge against inflation. To keep inflation low we keep unemployment higher than it ought to be, and raises to a minimum. Hammer down wages and there will be no "wage/price spiral," a classic description of inflation.
The rich are very, very concerned about inflation. Always. And they dupe ordinary people worried about getting by into their role of inflation-concerned political cannon fodder for the interests of the super rich.
Doctor Krugman revisits the 1970s, the decade conservative doctrine requires must (for any of their theory to make sense) have been the low point in human existence...
But there were some people for whom the 70s really were the worst of times namely, owners of financial assets. Heres the ratio of financial assets held by households to GDP versus the core inflation rate:
And who cares a lot about financial assets, not so much about labor income? The 0.1 percent, who according to the Piketty-Saez database only get about 4 percent of total wages but have more than 20 percent of the wealth and surely a larger share of financial assets...
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/06/oligarchy-and-monetary-policy/
1000words
(7,051 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)doing well because they are making more money but in reality, once inflation is taken into account,
they are doing worse.
And don't take any price index seriously that excludes 'food and energy'.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)Economists from Krugman to Friedman have consistently shown that expansionary fiscal policy is the best way to end a recession. Milton Friedman suggested (albeit jokingly) that we throw a trillion dollars out of a helicopter if the country experiences events similar to the last 7 years.
Rich people convincing the masses to fear inflation is nothing but a cloth pulled over your eyes to blind you to the truth that they don't want you to see.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)Having accumulated my stack, capital preservation turns out to be the only thing that matters.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)We typically have an economic choice between high employment and wage expansion, or controlling inflation. (The Fed's dual mandate of full employment and no inflation is understood to be an impossible state, thus the balancing act nature of the dual mandate.)
Asset bubbles and grotesque inequality are products of too much anti-inflation policy.
Inflation is a product of high employment, high wage policy.
One choses one's poison. And policy should never be extreme in either direction.
But shading the balance more toward the inflation side provides the best net for the poor and working class, and probably middle class.
And shading policy toward the anti-inflation side is a reliable boon for asset traders and folks with lots of cash and bonds.