Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 01:33 PM Mar 2012

Something awesome and something I don't get about "Obamacare"

Just found out that as of 2014 they can't charge extra for pre-existing conditions!!!!

So for someone like me it is GREAT! But what I don't understand is why would I not just pay the penalty until I need insurance, and then get insurance when needed. It looks like it will be cheaper than actually carrying insurance full-time. Unless I'm underestimating the cost of the penalty.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Something awesome and something I don't get about "Obamacare" (Original Post) Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 OP
Not that I'm an expert, but I believe the penalty is Cleita Mar 2012 #1
they can adjust the penalty Enrique Mar 2012 #2
I'll have to look into it. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #4
That is exactly what many people will do. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2012 #3
It will make sense for me if it's less. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #5
I beg to differ ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2012 #12
I said many, not most. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2012 #13
Well, they could set up the coverage like Medicare DJ13 Mar 2012 #6
Is that in the currect bill though? I don't think that is the case and I need to know if it is. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #7
I dont know, but probably not DJ13 Mar 2012 #9
The whole idea of insurance is that you pay for coverage IN CASE you need it. Demit Mar 2012 #8
Then we need to change the idea of insurance. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #11
Another provision of Obama Care is that companies can only make a 15% profit so... Walk away Mar 2012 #10
the penalty is a percentage of your gross income firehorse Mar 2012 #14

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
1. Not that I'm an expert, but I believe the penalty is
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 01:39 PM
Mar 2012

a way of making you pay no matter what. I think we have something similar in our mandated car insurance laws in California. In this case you have to guarantee a bond for a large amount of money in lieu of buying insurance, or it was like that at one time. I haven't kept up with the law. However, it means you have to pay something into it.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
2. they can adjust the penalty
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 01:40 PM
Mar 2012

those calculations are incredibly complex, they will probably have to be continuously fine tuning it based on experience.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
4. I'll have to look into it.
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 01:42 PM
Mar 2012

Obviously, if it is more than carrying insurance then there is no point. But if there is less than there may be some point to paying the penalty. Also I wonder if you can upgrade insurance coverage midstream with no penalty.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
3. That is exactly what many people will do.
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 01:41 PM
Mar 2012

For those who make too much to be eligible for a subsidy, the penalty is less than the cost of insurance.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
12. I beg to differ ...
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 02:07 PM
Mar 2012

because MOST people working (80+%), are unaffected by the mandate because they already receive health insurance through their employer.

Unless you're suggesting that people will drop their employer-provided insurance in favor of paying the fee/fine.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
13. I said many, not most.
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 02:11 PM
Mar 2012

Many of the uninsured by choice will remain uninsured because the penalty is cheaper.

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
6. Well, they could set up the coverage like Medicare
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 01:45 PM
Mar 2012

Where you can only enroll during a short period at the end of the year.

That would prevent using it as a form of catastrophic insurance.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
7. Is that in the currect bill though? I don't think that is the case and I need to know if it is. nt
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 01:47 PM
Mar 2012

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
9. I dont know, but probably not
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 01:51 PM
Mar 2012

I was giving a potential remedy I could see the government taking down the line to prevent that loophole from being used.

 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
8. The whole idea of insurance is that you pay for coverage IN CASE you need it.
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 01:48 PM
Mar 2012

It's not saying "Okay, I have a claim now. I'm ready to join up now so that you can pay my claim." Sheesh.

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
10. Another provision of Obama Care is that companies can only make a 15% profit so...
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 01:51 PM
Mar 2012

it might seem as though not paying into the system is mostly just screwing your fellow Americans.

firehorse

(755 posts)
14. the penalty is a percentage of your gross income
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 02:11 PM
Mar 2012

heard this on WNYC this morning, but I forget the percentage, and I don't know if this includes investment income: dividends, mutual funds, etc.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Something awesome and som...