In Kiev, Crushing IMF Austerity Defended as 'Price of Independence'/"Yats" Strikes Back!
Published on Friday, April 4, 2014 by Common Dreams
Interim Prime Minister Arseny Yatseniuk continues to tell Ukrainians and the world that gutting pensions
- Jon Queally, staff writer
Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseny Yatseniuk speaks during an interview with Reuters in Kiev April 3, 2014. The new Ukraine government in Kiev, currently led by interim Prime Minister Arseny Yatseniuk, continues to tell its people that the only path forward for the country is to submit to the demands of the international financial powers—specifically the International Monetary Fund—by meeting their demands to implement draconian cuts to social funding, pensions, and otherwise "liberalizing" the economy in exchange for billions of dollars in bailout loans.
Noting full-well the unpopularity of and crushing impact that ending fuel subsidies and cutting both wages and pensions will have on regular Ukrainians, Yatseniuk told Reuters in an interview published Friday that these measures—which are set conditions for a $14-$18 billion loan package from the IMF—are simply the "price of independence."
He called the plan being structured in Kiev at the behest of the western economic powers as "tremendous step forward" even as economists and researchers have repeatedly and consistently shown that austerity measures like the ones now under consideration have a destructive, long-term impact on national economies, especially those suffering from a debt crisis.
"We will regain trust and credibility from foreign investors," said Yatseniuk, defending the plan. "This is the roadmap for Ukraine."
That may be so. But as Jack Rasmus, a professor of economics at St. Mary's College, pointed out following the announcement of IMF conditions now being pushed in Kiev, this roadmap might lift the street credibility of Yatseniuk among the world's powerful financial elite (the Reuters report says western leaders are impressed by what they term his "clear-sightedness" on economic matters), but it's the nation's regular citizens and workers who will ultimately pay the price for these short-sighted policies.
"Those who will pay will not be the bankers and multinational businessmen, but the Ukrainian people," argued Rasmus. "That is the essential and repeated history and legacy of IMF deals globally for the last three decades."
___________________________________________
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
= new reply since forum marked as read
these "un-elected leader"
s) put the country on the hook for these conditions and the repayment of the debt EVEN IF THEY'RE OVERTHROWN IN A TRUE POPULAR REVOLUTION. Or for that matter, in another election.
One of the things that stuck with me from Naomi Klein's book was how Chile was still on the hook for Pinochet's debts even after Pinochet was overthrown. And what added salt to those particular wounds was that a large part of that debt was to the USA for the training and equipment that Pinochet used to oppress the Chilean people. Basically, Chileans STILL had to pay for the means that Pinochet used to torture and murder them. That ain't right.
the Ukrainian "Coup Government" is Legit. 
So "Yats" (as Victoria Nuland of our State Department referred to him) is the "Interim" Globalist Banker insider who will set up the rules for whatever "elected" Govt. follows him.
I guess he's the "FIXER" for the Globalists and EU Interests.
though.
Or...do you think it HAS turned out well.
Do you have some examples. I can't find any...
