Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 12:17 PM Mar 2012

Supreme court sets aside Myriad gene patent ruling

The Supreme Court set aside on Monday a ruling that Myriad Genetics Inc can patent two genes linked to breast and ovarian cancers, in a case closely watched by the biotechnology industry.

The justices set aside a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that Myriad has the right to patent two human genes, known as BRCA1 and BRCA2, that account for most inherited forms of breast and ovarian cancers, and sent the matter back for more proceedings.

The Supreme Court ordered the further proceedings at the lower court in view of the high court's ruling last week in a case that raised similar issues and that held that companies cannot patent observations about a natural phenomenon.
...
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/26/us-myriadgenetics-patent-idUSBRE82P0N220120326
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme court sets aside Myriad gene patent ruling (Original Post) muriel_volestrangler Mar 2012 OP
Good ruling, stupid patent saras Mar 2012 #1
Patenting extant genes in nature is just wrong on so many levels longship Mar 2012 #2
 

saras

(6,670 posts)
1. Good ruling, stupid patent
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 12:30 PM
Mar 2012

When the company creates a gene, base pair by base pair, from scratch, with reference ONLY to theory and NOT to existing genes, THEN and ONLY THEN do they deserve a patent for an invention.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme court sets aside ...