Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 08:34 AM Apr 2014

Would Saul Alinsky Break His Own Rules?

https://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/04/04-0



Although Saul Alinsky, the founding father of modern community organizing in the United States, passed away in 1972, he is still invoked by the right as a dangerous harbinger of looming insurrection. And although his landmark book, Rules for Radicals, is now nearly 45 years old, the principles that emerged from Alinsky’s work have influenced every generation of community organizers that has come since.

The most lasting of Alinsky’s prescriptions are not his well-known tactical guidelines — “ridicule is man’s most potent weapon” or “power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Rather, they are embedded in a set of organizational practices and predispositions, a defined approach to building power at the level of local communities. Hang around social movements for a while and you will no doubt be exposed to the laws of Chicago-style community organizing: “Don’t talk ideology, just issues. No electoral politics. Build organizations, not movements… Focus on neighborhoods and on concrete, winnable goals.”

Veteran labor writer David Moberg recently offered this list when reflecting on the work of National People’s Action, or NPA, one of today’s leading coalitions of community-based groups. Given that NPA’s dynamic executive director, George Goehl, was trained by Shel Trapp — a prominent Alinsky disciple — it is no surprise that traditional community organizing principles are still reflected in the bottom-up, door-to-door methodologies of NPA affiliates in 14 states.

At the same time, under Goehl’s leadership, National People’s Action is also doing many things differently. His coalition is now embracing a big-picture vision (talking about cooperative ownership of business and public control of finance), and it is making forays into electoral politics (forming a lobbying arm to do legislative advocacy and possibly even to run candidates). In pushing beyond Alinsky’s traditional rules, Goehl is motivated not only to win concrete reforms within the existing political system but to develop, Moberg writes, the “vision, strategy, and full arsenal of political weapons needed to roll back decades of corporate conservative victories and to create a more democratic economy and government.”
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would Saul Alinsky Break His Own Rules? (Original Post) xchrom Apr 2014 OP
k/r marmar Apr 2014 #1
of course mikehiggins Apr 2014 #2

marmar

(77,084 posts)
1. k/r
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 08:48 AM
Apr 2014

[font size="4"]"Always remember the first rule of power tactics; power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have."[/font]

One of my favorite Saul Alinsky quotes


mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
2. of course
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 09:48 AM
Apr 2014

Alinsky wasn't a Prophet, he was a tactician. And the times were different. The PTB tried their best to keep hidden behind the curtain. Now they are in your face and boast of it. What Goehl seems to be doing is necessary, though rife with possible stumbling blocks. The effectiveness of Alinsky is proven every day as the PTB foam at the mouth every time his name is mentioned. We can only hope that they will choke on it.

That would be nice.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would Saul Alinsky Break ...