General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat bearing does Trayvon Martin's criminal history (or lack thereof) have to do with this case?
Let's say he was a bank robber. Or an embezzler. Or a drug kingpin. Or a pot smoker. Does that give someone the right to kill him?
The facts are, he was unarmed, he encountered George Zimmerman, and now he's dead.
Kurska
(5,739 posts)That being that he briefly followed Trayvon, tried to go back to his car and was attacked from behind.
rustydog
(9,186 posts)and not taking Zimmerman's word as gospel until drug and alcohol tests for both come back. When ballistics are done on the CONFISCATED firearm used in the shooting.
SATIRical
(261 posts)then the character and demeanor of the two involved matters.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)in the eyes of some.
Consider the Primaries: one candidate is good, and then the others are bad. Obama and Clinton had seemingly exact platforms, but one was great and one was horrible in the eyes of some DUers. Same principle at work in my opinion.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)aptal
(304 posts)show his character and give insight on how he may have acted in such a situation. It's ridiculous that the right wing is making him to be some gangsta. It's doesn't matter if he was a gangsta or not. Zimmerman straight up killed him for no reason.
elleng
(130,935 posts)The jury will be instructed to ignore any illusion to such.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)arthritisR_US
(7,288 posts)Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)none
murielm99
(30,741 posts)is not admissible during a trial. The person on trial should not be judged on past actions that have nothing to do with a current case. And trying the victim is reprehensible. If I was on a jury and noticed that the defense was trying the victim, I would lose sympathy with the defendant.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)...and relevant, because his previous arrest illustrates his trouble with authority.
murielm99
(30,741 posts)but I don't know why.
pettypace
(744 posts)nt
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)But then again, aren't they all...
Response to alcibiades_mystery (Reply #12)
Post removed
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)It's good to see that this event is really drawing the unreconstructed out of their dank little holes.
pettypace
(744 posts)Would you prefer to live in an all-black population?
And if not, what expectations do you have from whites/latinos/Asians? At what point will you stop thinking you're the only group that is discriminated against?
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)I'm really enjoying your candid airing of your feelings here. It's useful to have your deep feelings of anger towards African Americans out on display for all to see. Tell us more. It will make you feel better about yourself to get it all out.
Chaney2020
(1 post)This guy could very well be a racist, but that really isn't the point. He raises an interesting question, "Would you want to live in an all-black environment?" Of course, the fact that the black population of the United States has suffered the most from the ridiculous income gap that plagues the nation, plays a major role in my answer.
No, I would not want to live in an American all-black environment, not because of the color of their skin but because of the rather cruel environment that has formed the basis of their experiences. And of course, each and every black person does NOT develop into an unsavory character due to being subjected to the plight of the low-income class. And of course, not each and every black person who is raised in a comfortable income bracket becomes a well-mannered, good person. However, the economic environment in which one is raised does play a major role in the personal development of all races. This truth may sting like morning light through sleepy eyes, but failing to address the problem will only result in a progressively deteriorating situation.
As the wealthy elite continue to hoard their gold and determine the US's future through campaign contributions and lobbying, and the 99% are denied the right to assemble peacefully as stated clearly in the Constitution of the United States of America, prepare for gloomier days ahead.
TBF
(32,062 posts)welcome to DU. Thanks for addressing class, we don't see that nearly enough here.
Moses2SandyKoufax
(1,290 posts)when racist human trash like yourself is relegated to the fringes of society.
crunch60
(1,412 posts)Zimmerman look like he was justified in the shooting. He continued to stalk Martin, even though he was told NOT to follow him by 911 operator.
Despite the law, using "what would a reasonable man do" theory, I believe it was a hate crime. You don't run to a perceived danger, you call for backup, observe and report. Was Zimmerman's life or anyone else's in danger? No.
dkf
(37,305 posts)How are you supposed to judge that?
crunch60
(1,412 posts)he use weaponless defense instead of a gun? If he designated himself "captain" of the neighbor watch, I would think he should have some training in that area. He was also a much larger man than Martin.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)and they were both young men. I doubt Zimmerman could have felt his life was in peril.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)He didn't deserve to die.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)marlakay
(11,470 posts)Right now I think everyone almost in america thinks he is guilty, I do from what I have read and heard so far.
It sickens me though that he is doing it, the poor boy is dead and all they can do is throw crap on him.
MrBig
(640 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)If you can do that then you create doubt in the law and order types, Reagan Democrats, and of course among the fearful.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Poison the jury by making the victim look bad even if it is not relevant to the case.
Rex
(65,616 posts)verbally defend himself in public.