Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueDemKev

(3,003 posts)
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:16 PM Mar 2012

I almost VOMITED....

....Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) says "we are begging the Supreme Court to leave us at least one shred of freedom by allowing us to choose not purchase a commodity we don't want to buy. Is that too much to ask?"

Johnson, you fucking prick....why do you think I should have to pay for someone else's medical bills because they "chose not to purchase" health insurance coverage?

The "individual mandate" was a REPUBLICAN idea in 1994. When the Democrats signed onto the idea essentially saying "you guys were right", you and your hypocritical right-wing country club buddies all start screaming "TYRANNY!!"

**************************************************************

For all progressives in Wisconsin who didn't bother to vote in Nov. 2010.....I HOPE YOU'RE SATISFIED. Your misguided anger resulted in Scott Walker becoming your governor and the country losing a great Senator in Russ Feingold for a right-wing looney-bin who's controlled by the tea party.

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I almost VOMITED.... (Original Post) BlueDemKev Mar 2012 OP
If they would just support single payer Stan Smith Mar 2012 #1
Do you actually believe any Congress would pass Single-Payer? BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #5
I am well aware that this congress especially would never go for it. Stan Smith Mar 2012 #12
Last Congress couldn't do it.... BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #17
It'll happen through the backdoor jeff47 Mar 2012 #25
You know what?..... BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #26
I agree! Stan Smith Mar 2012 #29
exactly. Everyone calm down and support ACA--it's the door to single payer librechik Mar 2012 #42
+1. BTW, I want to opt out of all your wars, sir! freshwest Mar 2012 #2
that's called the ole 'Feet to the Fire' method. Whisp Mar 2012 #3
Imagine if the Democrats stayed home In Connecticut in 2010? Dawson Leery Mar 2012 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #7
The difference between a Dem governor and a Walker clone was <20,000 votes in Illinois NNN0LHI Mar 2012 #14
Bill Brady was insane. Dawson Leery Mar 2012 #22
Yeah, but you handed your Senate seat to a Rethug.... BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #23
well, as you know Linda is back. Or a softer, gentler Linda not pounding our psyches withher CTyankee Mar 2012 #37
Linda has 33% favorable rating. Murhpy is in the mid 50's. Dawson Leery Mar 2012 #40
that's good to know! Thanks. I don't see those state stats very much in the New Haven Register. CTyankee Mar 2012 #41
Well in states like Virginia Politicalboi Mar 2012 #6
They don't care. They don't care. They don't care. They don't care. Initech Mar 2012 #8
So easy to be a Con... humbled_opinion Mar 2012 #10
I've come to the conclusion that republicanism is a glorious lack of empathy. Initech Mar 2012 #19
You're letting him set the tone of the discussion Zalatix Mar 2012 #9
I want the same right they are crying out for regarding car Insurance! rustydog Mar 2012 #11
You bring up a good point. Stan Smith Mar 2012 #13
Exactly.... Hepburn Mar 2012 #15
Thank you! BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #24
Your argument is right wing in nature. The fact is that while other democracies who Bluenorthwest Mar 2012 #27
Ahem..car insurance, property insurance,various licenses/marriage, social security MichiganVote Mar 2012 #32
I guess these Repubs don't own cars JFN1 Mar 2012 #16
the car equivalency belcffub Mar 2012 #38
And they're even worse in the House! CBHagman Mar 2012 #18
Hate to tell you this, but... derby378 Mar 2012 #20
But in the meantime.... BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #21
So the only way to do that is to become the only democracy on the planet to mandate Bluenorthwest Mar 2012 #28
Not necessarily BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #36
+1 progressoid Mar 2012 #31
It was a Repub idea in 1994 and by Nixon in 1974 progressoid Mar 2012 #30
I will support it.... BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #35
It is socialism - CORPORATE socialism progressoid Mar 2012 #43
Excuse me, but a lot of the time it isn't a real "choice". liberalhistorian Mar 2012 #33
I hesitated to click on this. xfundy Mar 2012 #34
This from the guy who defeated Russ Feingold.... a kennedy Mar 2012 #39

BlueDemKev

(3,003 posts)
5. Do you actually believe any Congress would pass Single-Payer?
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:21 PM
Mar 2012

After the way Americans went ape-shit over a simple, market-based reform plan, you think they would accept a universal, federal gov't-run health care system?

Stan Smith

(97 posts)
12. I am well aware that this congress especially would never go for it.
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:30 PM
Mar 2012

However, after we regain congress next year we can pressure the hell out of them to do the right thing. I realize that we can't get single payer overnight, because too many people believe the talking heads on the television telling them that single payer is socialism and socialism is bad, but I have confidence that after the Affordable Health Care Act goes into full effect that people will warm up to the idea of the government paying for all our health care. They keep talking about freedom, yet they can't see just how much more freedom we all will have if health care is taken care of. No more going into poverty for just being sick.

BlueDemKev

(3,003 posts)
17. Last Congress couldn't do it....
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:33 PM
Mar 2012

...no Congress ever will (at least not in our lifetimes). The last Congress had the largest representation of progressives since the mid-1960's and single-payer never stood a chance.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
25. It'll happen through the backdoor
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:41 PM
Mar 2012

1) Set up the exchanges.

2) The ACA takes away the financial benefits for employers to buy health insurance. So more and more people will end up in the exchanges.

3) As the exchanges become more and more critical, there will be more and more pressure to offer a government option in the exchanges. That will give Congress cover to create a government option to compete against the for-profit insurers.

4) As a non-profit entity, that government option should end up cheaper, thus people will gravitate towards it. They won't find themselves dead any more frequently than private insurers, taking away the irrational fear. That will get it yet more converts.

Result: A massively overly-complex Rube Goldberg system that ends up being single payer. Could happen within 20 years.

BlueDemKev

(3,003 posts)
26. You know what?.....
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:43 PM
Mar 2012

...I sure hope that Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy don't see your post.

Stan Smith

(97 posts)
29. I agree!
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 10:13 PM
Mar 2012

That is the beauty behind Obamacare, as they have dubbed it, in 20 years or so everyone will be happy that President Obama got the ball rolling, and we all have single payer just like all the other civilized countries of the world.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
42. exactly. Everyone calm down and support ACA--it's the door to single payer
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 02:00 PM
Mar 2012

Repeal of the law would set us back agian by decades perhaps.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
3. that's called the ole 'Feet to the Fire' method.
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:19 PM
Mar 2012

it's just to keep Obama on the right track you see, all this cursing and disrespect of him. Anything good he ever did was because some asshole"progressive' like Jane Hamsher took a shit on him and FORCED him, becuase otherwise he's really lazy and stupid - he wouldn't know what to do, if these assholes weren't there yelling at him and calling him names constantly.

friggen sarcasm - huge horking Sarc the size of hamshers fucking yap

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
4. Imagine if the Democrats stayed home In Connecticut in 2010?
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:20 PM
Mar 2012

We would have Senator Linda McMahon and "Taliban Dan" Debicella in congress. Mr. Debicella (R-Cesspool....Shelton) opposes emergency contraception for rape victims.

Response to Dawson Leery (Reply #4)

NNN0LHI

(67,190 posts)
14. The difference between a Dem governor and a Walker clone was <20,000 votes in Illinois
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:31 PM
Mar 2012

We dodged a bullet.

Don

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
37. well, as you know Linda is back. Or a softer, gentler Linda not pounding our psyches withher
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 10:17 AM
Mar 2012

incessant commercials. Still, I think she'll have a tough time up against Chris Murphy, unless there is something that I don't know against Chris. He seems to be an amiable person. She comes across as a tough customer, and all that wrestling stuff doesn't play well to women voters outside of her party.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
40. Linda has 33% favorable rating. Murhpy is in the mid 50's.
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 01:54 PM
Mar 2012

The majority of women do NOT care for her business dealings.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
41. that's good to know! Thanks. I don't see those state stats very much in the New Haven Register.
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 01:58 PM
Mar 2012

They must be in the Courant tho...

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
6. Well in states like Virginia
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:22 PM
Mar 2012

They are going to make women pay for something they don't need, and they all seem to think that is alright. How would this be different. Repukes make me want to vomit too.

Initech

(100,076 posts)
19. I've come to the conclusion that republicanism is a glorious lack of empathy.
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:34 PM
Mar 2012

Really - they don't care about anyone but themselves and will not endorse something that may actually help people if it means that the other side will benefit. Im so sick of this opposition party bullshit I could

 

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)
9. You're letting him set the tone of the discussion
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:27 PM
Mar 2012
Johnson, you fucking prick....why do you think I should have to pay for someone else's medical bills because they "chose not to purchase" health insurance coverage?

Instead of answering like that, why not frame things the Democratic Party way:

Medicare For All.
http://medicareforall.org

rustydog

(9,186 posts)
11. I want the same right they are crying out for regarding car Insurance!
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:29 PM
Mar 2012

Yes, I want to decide on my own without fear of fines from the Gubmint for failure to be properly insured.
If I get in a head on collision and need expensive surgery...that is my problem, right.

Just like the neocons screaming that people like my brother with lung cancer whose employer does not have employee health insurance programs can just up and die. it is their fault they did not get a better job or don'tmake enough money to afford a private policy.

Hepburn

(21,054 posts)
15. Exactly....
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:32 PM
Mar 2012

....there are NO free rides. Those who do NOT want to have to buy health ins expect the rest of us to pay their way.

BlueDemKev

(3,003 posts)
24. Thank you!
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:41 PM
Mar 2012

I'm glad that somebody else sees this correctly. Conservatives talk about "personal responsibility" so long as it's convenient.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
27. Your argument is right wing in nature. The fact is that while other democracies who
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:47 PM
Mar 2012

mandate the purchase of health insurance make it illegal for those selling them to do so for profit, our system enshrines the idea that those companies hold right to that profit. So arguing for an mandate is not a complete argument. You also need to explain why a mandate to purchase for profit products is necessary. No other nation on earth does so.
While you say 'no free rides' what you mean is 'huge free ride for the Insurance Companies'.

 

MichiganVote

(21,086 posts)
32. Ahem..car insurance, property insurance,various licenses/marriage, social security
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 10:36 PM
Mar 2012

medicaid, medicare, mortgage insurance, all of these and more are mandated by various states...

JFN1

(2,033 posts)
16. I guess these Repubs don't own cars
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:32 PM
Mar 2012

because the government forces us to buy freaking insurance for those...

belcffub

(595 posts)
38. the car equivalency
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 10:27 AM
Mar 2012

not all states require insurance... some allow you to post a bond and self insure...

I can buy a car, not put it on the road and not buy insurance...

I have a choice in buying a car or not... not so much in living... well I guess I do...

the car thing just doesn't work as an equivalency

CBHagman

(16,984 posts)
18. And they're even worse in the House!
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:33 PM
Mar 2012

One of my co-workers referred to today's House Republican press conference on the PPACA (featuring Louie Gohmert, Virginia Foxx et al) was the equivalent of a clown car, or maybe a clown bus.

derby378

(30,252 posts)
20. Hate to tell you this, but...
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:34 PM
Mar 2012

I opposed the individual mandate when the Repukes dreamed it up, and I opposed it when the Dems embraced it.

I want Democratic health care reform, which means preserving our freedom from Big Insurance and its greedy talons.

BlueDemKev

(3,003 posts)
21. But in the meantime....
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:38 PM
Mar 2012

....let's at least stop insurance companies from denying coverage to people with pre-existing conditions and also from cancelling someone's existing coverage AFTER they become sick.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
28. So the only way to do that is to become the only democracy on the planet to mandate
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:51 PM
Mar 2012

the purchase of for profit insurance products? Other countries employ a mandate, and all of them make it illegal to sell mandated products for a profit. So it is not just that it is a mandate, it is that it is a for profit, no other choice mandate. The first in any country. Dig that. The first.

BlueDemKev

(3,003 posts)
36. Not necessarily
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 10:13 AM
Mar 2012

If a not-for-profit organization offers bona-fide health insurance coverage, you could opt for that. Shift your anger from the insurance companies and focus on the real problem which is the cost of medical care itself. It will take years, probably decades, to get that under control (and probably zero chance until the baby-boomers have passed on and we get obesity under control), but in the meantime, let's at least allow people to obtain health insurance coverage regardless of their past medical history. We can build on and improve the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act as we go along and society continues to evolve.

progressoid

(49,990 posts)
30. It was a Repub idea in 1994 and by Nixon in 1974
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 10:35 PM
Mar 2012

So what part of this Republican plan should we embrace?

Repubs are only opposed to it on political grounds. If it were proposed by W, they would be all for it. Would we be for it if W had proposed it?

BlueDemKev

(3,003 posts)
35. I will support it....
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 10:05 AM
Mar 2012

...if the Republicans come up with a good idea (which doesn't happen too often), I WILL support it. The irony here is that Obama and the Democrats said "Hey Republicans, you were right about this. So let's do it" and THEN the Republicans ran from the idea like the plague and started screaming "communism, socialism, marxism, tyranny, government-takeover.....blah-blah-blah...."

A bunch of lying hypocrites.

progressoid

(49,990 posts)
43. It is socialism - CORPORATE socialism
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 09:08 PM
Mar 2012

That is NOT a good idea. Especially for Democrats. But sadly, endorsing corporatiism seems the be OK for our party now.

The irony here is that most Democrats don't even know why they support it and most Republicans don't understand why they oppose it.

liberalhistorian

(20,818 posts)
33. Excuse me, but a lot of the time it isn't a real "choice".
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 10:46 PM
Mar 2012

When you're self-employed or your job doesn't offer insurance, individual plans are often far too expensive, with horrendous deductibles (usually 5 grand or more), and they don't cover shit. Especially if you're older than thirty and were treated for anything more than minor cold throughout your entire life. If you've had anything more than a minor cold since you were three years old, and you're older than 30, such plans want nothing to do with you or will make it too expensive for you.

And frankly, I'd rather pay for the health care of others through my taxes than to bail out rich fucks who are making their money by playing with the life savings and nest eggs of Americans who are relying on them for their security. What I do NOT appreciate it paying taxes that will pay for the health care of my congress critters and senators who are doing everything in their power to appeal the law and to shred the safety net, all the while screaming against the evil federal government and the taxes that pay their salaries and benefits.

xfundy

(5,105 posts)
34. I hesitated to click on this.
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 10:53 PM
Mar 2012

Thought it might contain something to do with Cheney's new, shinier, blacker, more sinister heart. I heard it ate its way out of its former owner.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I almost VOMITED....