Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Opposition to Obamacare has little legal grounds to stand on, only political & that doesn't count (Original Post) FarLeftFist Mar 2012 OP
I would have agreed before I witnessed Bush V Gore. phantom power Mar 2012 #1
This is the same court that said corporations are people. muntrv Mar 2012 #2
Dartmouth College v. Woodward Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #4
Exactly.. DCBob Mar 2012 #3
It said number 4 should be ruled first. Was that not discussed by the Court today? joeglow3 Mar 2012 #5
Yes, the "tax or not a tax" issue was the focus today. DCBob Mar 2012 #6

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
1. I would have agreed before I witnessed Bush V Gore.
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 06:18 PM
Mar 2012

But clearly, we now live in a world where the political does definitely count.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
4. Dartmouth College v. Woodward
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 07:58 PM
Mar 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood

^snip^


The Supreme Court of the United States (Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 1819), recognized corporations as having the same rights as natural persons to contract and to enforce contracts



This court expanded on a previous ruling. They are not really the ones who started this insanity.
 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
5. It said number 4 should be ruled first. Was that not discussed by the Court today?
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 08:03 PM
Mar 2012

I am going off what I heard on NPR on the way home from work.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Opposition to Obamacare h...