General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStop Calling it 'Birth Control'
The term "birth control" is slightly misleading as it has alternative uses beyond acting as a contraceptive and is used by many American women exclusively for non-contraceptive purposes.
Hormonal 'birth control' pills thicken the cervical mucus which acts as a barrier that helps to prevent Pelvic Inflammatory Disease, can reduce severe mood swings and bloating that some women get before their monthly periods, is used to treat ovarian cysts and prevent ovarian and Colorectal cancer,...etc.
Therefore, it is not accurate to say that a woman using the hormonal pill is using it solely for the purpose of preventing pregnancy, as that could be considered a side effect rather than the sole intention of the medication.
MADem
(135,425 posts)opening gambit.
Years ago, it was popularly prescribed as "acne control," IIRC.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It sure does work for that!
unblock
(52,247 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)birth control. Rebranding the name to hide it's purpose is playing into the hands of the anti contraceptive nuts. There's no shame in using birth control to stop pregnancies and no need to rebrand it to sooth the religious nuts. I'm tired of their shit and don't care if they approve of contraceptives or not.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)Thank you for saving me some typing. We need to stop allowing the fundies to frame the issue.
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)but I think that ship has sailed.
Margaret Sanger came up with the phrase "birth control" almost 100 years ago - there is nothing wrong with the term and there is no reason to hide behind the other uses of hormonal contraceptives to assuage the sensibilities of lunatics. That's a step back, not a step forward.
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)arguing back and forth about what things should be called only derails the discussion about what's really important:
That, whatever it's called, women should have easy access to it.
As for me, the only time I ever took birth control pills was to correct a serious bleeding problem after the birth of my third child 40 years ago. In that respect, yes, they were being used as "hormone pills", but it didn't bother me that they were called "birth control" pills.
I didn't give a shit. Just stop the damned bleeding, PLEASE!
They did.
All of this fussing over words...
sigh
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)From Guttmacher:
http://www.guttmacher.org/media/nr/2011/11/15/
Igel
(35,317 posts)Spin is used to deceive and trick.
"Framing" obviously has to be a good thing.
Both are the same thing: Madison Avenue techniques applied to politics. We don't like PR and the overt manipulation that's behind it.
I'd also add that language isn't logical. You want to make everything in language "accurate" and "logical" and the result won't be pretty.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)It's an accurate word, since it prevents conception in most cases, or implantation of the embryo.
Most women who take contraceptive pills on a regular basis are doing so to prevent a pregnancy. While some do take them for other reasons, the primary reason is to prevent conception.
The_Commonist
(2,518 posts)I will not stop calling it birth control.
Certainly, some people use hormonal pills for non-contraceptive reasons.
But most of the time contraceptives are used for contraception.
This is nothing to be embarrassed about!
Stop telling people what to do and say.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)dawg
(10,624 posts)attracted to big, rugged, burly men, and more attracted to softer, gentler, cuter men.
In other words ... they should be mandatory!
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Your OP implies that it's ok to restrict it from people who use it to prevent pregnancy.
And that's bullshit.
cali
(114,904 posts)Squinch
(50,955 posts)It makes the point that I get to control the number of times I give birth, and how many times I give birth is nobody else's damn business.
3catwoman3
(24,006 posts)I think part of the mind set of those who object to avaliability of birth control probably also think that suffering with menstrually related symtoms is just part of a woman's lot in life and not deserving of relief.
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)my business and butt out of private conversations between women and their doctors, and women and their partners. My healthcare is my own damn business, and I don't see why I should have to pretend that maybe I am using those little pills to regulate acne or my periods or anything else so that a bunch of backward, misogynistic bullies will "let" me keep on controlling my own decisions.
REP
(21,691 posts)It's not just pills. BIRTH CONTROL comes in all shapes and sizes - shots, implantables, insertables, barriers, surgery ... Some may help regulate a woman's reproductive cycle, but it's all BIRTH CONTROL. To prevent pregnancy.
Why call such a great thing anything else? Hormone pills doesn't describe my BIRTH CONTROL: tubal fulguration (they're gone daddy gone) and uterine ablation.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Men don't have to plead that boner pills are also a useful heart medication to avoid slut shaming.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)but that one is primary, sane, logical, and perfectly reasonable with no shame in it's game.
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)that if we stop calling The Pill "birth control" and start calling it "hormone control" instead, then I can realistically imagine at some point "they" (RW fruitloops) might try to force women asking for The Pill to prove it's only for hormone control and not for actual contraception.
It's a big enough fight as it is without making things harder...
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)The Hobby Lobby case, for instance, is about IUDs and 'morning after' pills, which are simple birth control.