General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThank you Bill Maher for treating President Carter with the class he deserves.
For those who haven't seen tonight's Real Time or even those who don't really like Bill Maher, I still encourage you to watch his interview with President Carter and then his new rules segment at the end of the show. I feel like Bill Maher just did more to vindicate and defend Jimmy Carter, as he rightfully should be vindicated and defended, than any other liberal media personality or politician has even thought about attempting. The points Bill makes in his New Rules segment about Carter should be studied, repeated and thrown in the face of every right winger that attempts to use "Jimmy Carter" as some kind of insult. We are talking about a real hero for humanity in general when we are talking about Jimmy Carter, its about time we start fighting that bullshit and shame these assholes who engage in such unfounded attacks against such a good god damn man.
Cha
(297,304 posts)Response to phleshdef (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)That was the real problem. It was like how Obama gets treated by the Republicans now, except Carter got it from both sides and it was because he was a true outsider.
Cha
(297,304 posts)firebaggers and the great duer's "pos used car" schtick.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)I love Teddy for a lot of things, but that was a disgusting moment for him and Democratic politics in general, in my opinion.
Cha
(297,304 posts)of politics back then. Wonder if Teddy ever kicked himself?
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)But from what I read, Carter and Kennedy DID reconcile.
Carter's statement in an interview after Teddy's death:
But I think that among all the members of our U.S. Senate and the Congress of the United States hes been pre-eminent. Hes been a staunch and honest and open and very able to express his views to the American people. And my own hope is that his deep commitment to a comprehensive health plan will be honored now by his contemporaries, by his peers, in the near future.
But weve already expressed, my wife and I, our condolences and our prayers to the family, and I dont think theres anybody that serves in the U.S. Congress now that could possibly be missed by the American people as much as Ted Kennedy.
INTERVIEWER: I think he was 47 years in the Senate, the third longest serving Senator ever. He pushed through a lot of big legislation. How did he change the American landscape?
CARTER: For the better. I think that Ted Kennedy, although he came from a very affluent family a very prominent family, successful in politics I think his first commitment was always to the people who were most in need, and he worked for those who were deprived in the American society, and not only did he work for them, but he was very effective in his legislative work. It was not just an idle commitment on his part. He was dedicated when the Senate was in session or out of session. Ted Kennedy, everyone knew, was fighting for the poor and deprived, those people in need in our community and our nation, and it was surprising how successful he was.
INTERVIEWER: It is a day to remember his achievements but also perhaps to ask the question of whether he might have achieved true political greatness were it not for his personal flaws. Would he have been President were it not for Chappaquiddick?
CARTER: Well, let me say that all of us have personal flaws and I dont think that this is a time to concentrate on that. As a matter of fact, when he ran against me for President it was shortly after Chappaquiddick and, although I never mentioned it in the campaign, I think it was a detrimental factor, and had he not had that embarrassing experience in his younger life he would have been maybe more successful on the national scene. But he more than made up for that after 1980 and during the years that he served before in the Senate and after the Chappaquiddick event occurred. And I think he suffered from the consequences of it. He bore it like a man and he survived in the minds and hearts of the American people.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/08/28/773602/-Jimmy-Carter-s-comments-on-the-death-of-Ted-Kennedy
Cha
(297,304 posts)You are a young start.
calimary
(81,314 posts)Great nobility, humility, and class. More built-in class than all the romneys could buy with all their money and car elevators. He got such a shitty deal from so much of America, and not just from the usual bad-guy suspects, either. People on our side of the aisle didn't give him much respect and treated him like a punching bag. He was and still is an extraordinarily classy man.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)it was certainly not what you would call polite.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Hahahhahahahhahaa.
I'm not exaggerating, I literally am laughing my ass off at that. Well done. LOL.
deathrind
(1,786 posts)Do you have specific examples? If u want to really see just how devious the Republican Party can be in their quest for power, research the Iranian hostage crisis and the intervention done by operatives of the Reagan campaign in preventing the release of hostages before the 1980 election. Carter was way ahead of his time. Had he won a second term and been able to enact and implement the programs he saw as vital to the future of American and the planet the human race would be in a much better postition today then we are. The man actually had solar panels installed on the White House... which Reagan promptly remove upon taking office.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)maybe even more than JFK. The irony is that I didn't vote for President Carter in 1976. I was busy having a small child and not really paying attention, and I liked Betty Ford a lot. Besides, I was somewhat bothered by Carter's religiosity. (Which looks so mild now.) But by the time 1980 rolled around, I was a big, big fan and was sorely disappointed when Reagan "won." Reagan's apparent resolution of the hostage crisis was manipulation of the worst kind. One has to suspect that deals were made.
This would have been a different country if Carter had won a second term, but the forces who really run the show could not let that happen. There are some really evil puppet-masters at the heart of this country's power structure, and they've been there for as long as I can remember, pulling strings...
I'm getting old, and I'm tired of it.
2banon
(7,321 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)for the world as the 2000 "selection" was. The 1980 election just wasn't quite as overtly stolen as was the election of 2000. And the GOP wasn't yet completely dominated by RW fundie crazies.
But Reagan's election and policies set the stage for almost everything bad that has happened since. One of the especially bad political consequences was that it sent too many Dems scurrying to find a "Third Way" instead of standing their ground and being proud liberals.
The way that Dems in general treated Carter - an outsider to the inside-the-Beltway powers that be - was neither kind nor intelligent for their long-term political strategy.
Carter stands for what is best in humanity, but with qualities that don't always help a politician who wants to win re-election. I'm so glad to see that he has been/is being recognized for that consistent and sincere humanity during his lifetime. He is certainly one of the most universally deserving Nobel Peace Prize winners ever.
CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)The dems have been weak since Reagan. When a two bit actor poked fun at the word at the word liberal, they should have said "Fuckin' A we're liberal & here's why" & then read off all the points in the Joe Conservative essay. Instead they ran away from the word with their tail between their legs & have abandoned many liberal policies as well. Too many in our party are on the same gravy train as the repubs.
When I think where we might be with the environment if the 1980 election hadn't been rigged with the whole Iranian hostage thing, well, it's sad. Tragic actually.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Reagan was the rot that started it all. Democrats turned tail and ran, for fear of his massive "popularity". Unfortunately, those who grew up under Reagan and are in office now are trying to emulate him with very little success and terrible consequences. No praise of Reagan or baby bush should ever pass a Democrat's lips. That is a huge alarm bell.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)that President Obama should be holding Jimmy Carter up as an example of a president to emulate rather than Ronald Reagan.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I am so tired of Democrats holding up Republicans as good with the economy, good at defense, or even fucking sane. Their ideas are WRONG WRONG WRONG for this country. I am dismayed whenever I hear his praise of Reagan and it has gone on since the beginning. Stop it!
Carter has so many things that appeal to what we need in this country: just a few examples being alternative energy and peace. This country is dying and we need a true liberal vision to get us on the right path.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Reagan and the GOP meme of "greed is good" won out over Carter's call for conservation.
Everyone in the nation blithely went for instant gratification brought to you by the GOP and not the shared sacrifice for a better future of Carter. And we are now paying for the lies of ethereal instant gratification.
babylonsister
(171,070 posts)newdemocrat999
(37 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)The New Rules usually get released for free internet consumption. The Interview parts are just here and there.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)I'll post later if I check it out. Thanks for the post phleshdef.
Hamlette
(15,412 posts)what a gem
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)I bought Carter's new book this week. I usually check books out at the library, but I wanted to support him, especially with this title. He is probably the most decent president in my lifetime.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)during my adult lifetime that I've had any respect for.
classof56
(5,376 posts)Worth the watch!
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)Thanks for the video!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)adirondacker
(2,921 posts)Tikki
(14,557 posts)of many of the former Presidents in their cookie packages.
I got a President Carter picture card and carried it in my wallet in the picture slot until it dissolved.
Every once and awhile someone would notice the card in my wallet when I showed ID
at a cash register and comment on President Carter's picture.
If they asked why I was carrying around his photo, I usually would answer that 'kindness
is good and, actually, lying and greed are not good.' I am not sure if they understood, but whatever.
Tikki
freshwest
(53,661 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)But I think that being a "good man" and "good president" aren't necessarily the same thing. It was LBJ who got the civil rights act passed, and he was a total asshole.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)I was delighted with the Mill Maher comments. You are absolutely correct. This was excellent.
mountain grammy
(26,623 posts)but the "exceptionalism" cheerleaders, warmongers and "morning in America" sucked in a whole bunch of voters. I think Ted Kennedy could have beaten Reagan. I knew Carter wouldn't, but having the entire Democratic party behind him might have not led to the landslide in 1980 and just maybe Reagan and his policies could have been mitigated. Who knows, I got drunk that election night. The beginning of the end.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Carter was replaced by something totally fucking awful. Carter was replaced by something that ought to be analysed into all its awful components and that ought to be exposed for the total decadence it was and is.
Not likely in our post-Orwellian "look forward, not back" age.
I don't give Reagan voters *any* credence, any excuses, because as a Canadian I watched the whole process, right down to the Jar of Jellybeans, the fireside chats, and the wars of choice that the fucker initiated. I read about the death squads that the fucker promoted - the uninhibited torture and murder that occurred because that fucker and his grisly Rasputin, Henry Kissinger, saw fit. I read about the fascist leaders of coups against democracy that the fucker dined with.
The term "Reagan Democrat" is an abomination.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... are the ones trying to take over the Democratic Party right now. The Third-Wayers, the DLCers.
delrem
(9,688 posts)I don't remember signing the Democratic Party over to the Reagan Democrats/DLCers/Third-wayers. Maybe you've ceded leadership over to them (and indeed ARE one of them), but I and the majority of DU members haven't.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Bye.
mountain grammy
(26,623 posts)and remember, that was before Fox news (or any cable news) and the proliferation of right wing radio. They were out there to be sure but we had the Fairness Doctrine that kept things pretty much in check. We still had real reporters.
The "something totally fucking awful" brought out the ignorant, the hateful and the very ingrained racism in so many Americans. He announced his run for the presidency in Philadelphia, Ms., famous for murdering civil rights workers. The racists fell right in line.
What was so disturbing and amazing about the whole thing was the rest of the country fell in line too. Like lambs to the slaughter, Unions endorsed Reagan and the first time I heard the term "Reagan Democrat" I threw up. You are right, it's an abomination, but it was all just preparation for the 2000 coup.
tooeyeten
(1,074 posts)He was by Bush in the White House.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Kennedy for what he did nor have I forgiven the 'moderate' Democrats who voted for Ronald "Satan" Reagan instead of Jimmy. They called themselves 'Reagan Democrats' then, I called them Republicans and still do.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)I will forgive the young, stupid "Reagan Democrats" who now realize their mistake and regret their votes, but they seem to be relatively few and far between. I really don't understand the attraction to that old coot. He was obviously dumb as a stump, and phoney as a three dollar bill. It still boggles my mind that that S.O.B. was given one term, let alone two.
madokie
(51,076 posts)Ted Kennedy cost us the election if anyone did. I remember it well. He went after Carter with fangs bared. It sucked and in my mind it still sucks to today.
marlakay
(11,473 posts)I have always liked him. He got railroaded by so much that wasn't his fault. I used to say he is too nice to be pres.
delrem
(9,688 posts)bayareaboy
(793 posts)But you have to say both him and his wife have done more to change peoples attitudes about home ownership for all people in America.
And of course decent elections all over the World.
joanbarnes
(1,722 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)by doing so.
Literally.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Our unions were strong during the Carter administration. Then those who voted for Reagan whined when he broke PATCO and then it worked its way down. Reagan did his best to destroy OSHA and all things that protected workers.
A very bitter time for me. I'm now thinking I was wrong to take the high road and not say, 'Ha! I told you so!' Maybe they would have learned something, maybe not.
JI7
(89,252 posts)IkeRepublican
(406 posts)I've noticed Carter's gotten some press over the past week, but wasn't sure of any of the actual sources. Need to go check it out. Thanks again.
First Speaker
(4,858 posts)...politically, at least, he was a failure. He had the hostage crisis and inflation, and they killed him, leading to the conservative ascendancy of 1980. But he and Adams were the two greatest ex-Presidents ever...
delrem
(9,688 posts)or any of the evil machinations of the fascists who engineered Iran/Contra.
First Speaker
(4,858 posts)...and it's irrelevant to anything I said. First of all, Iran-Contra occurred in 1986-7, and Carter, of course, was defeated in 1980. But if you mean the supposed "October Surprise" of 1980, and the conspiracy to keep the hostages in Iran until after the election, yes, I heard rumors of that at the time--October, 1980--from a relative who worked in the intelligence community. I did then--and do now--believe that the rumors are true. "Fascism" and "treason" are indeed appropriate words, though I don't believe it was as serious as Nixon's actions in 1968 to torpedo the Paris Peace Talks. But none of this came to light *in 1980*, which was the only point I'm trying to make.
delrem
(9,688 posts)That's when it started.
It continued because too few Americans could give a godamn.
Warpy
(111,274 posts)I think Maher realized just what a smart man Carter is and knew if he went for cheap laughs he'd be completely skewered in the most gentlemanly way and that he'd have a tough time recovering from it.
If we're here as a species to tell the story in another century, I think Carter will be remembered as one of the greatest humanitarian ruler of all time.