Has Clarence Thomas Recused himself from the

[malaise]

Affordable Health Care Act hearings?

[arthritisR_US]

1. He should, but no, I don't think so. n/t

[sadbear]

2. If it makes you feel better....

the other Justices have agreed not to wake him from nappy time during oral arguments.

[11 Bravo]

3. Ummm ... no. But I'm waiting for another porn-related case to come before the court.

Clarence would HAVE to recuse himself from that!

[longship]

4. No, he's merely re-snoozed himself

[YellowRubberDuckie]

5. When we take back the house...

....and we will take back the house, they need to impeach that sorry son of a...motherless goat.
Duckie

[BanTheGOP]

6. I wouldn't make too many waves...

I wouldn't make waves with this one. Elena Kagan was Solicitor-General in helping put together the health care bill, and was instrumental in getting many of its tenets palatable enough so even the blue dog scumsuckers had no choice but to vote for this fantastic bill. I'd very careful approaching this, as we need Kagan's vote, and unfortunately it could be argued that she has greater reason for recusal than Thomas. Of course, I don't recognize the republican Party or its criminal offender/politicians and justices, but unfortunately until we ban the GOP, we have to play the cards as they are dealt.

[Motown_Johnny]

7. That would require morals

so never gonna happen