General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsbill clinton and steny hoyer: the wall street democrats fight back
http://www.nationofchange.org/bill-clinton-and-steny-hoyer-wall-street-democrats-fight-back-1396013681If progressive and populist ideas resonate with most voters, some people have asked, why isnt the Democratic Party doing better in the polls? Heres one reason: Some of the partys most prominent leaders are still pushing Wall Streets unpopular and discredited economic platform.
Recent speeches by former President Bill Clinton and House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer showed that Wall Street continues to hold considerable sway in their party, despite the fact that its austerity agenda has failed. Its deficits over growth ideology has wounded both Europe and the United States. To hear Clinton and Hoyer speak, youd think wed learned nothing from the economic experience of the last five years.
The Millennial Deficit
What President Clinton says matters. Hes the architect and primary spokesperson for the corporatist and pro-Wall Street wing of his party. Hes also the political and personal partner of the Democratic Partys presumed 2016 candidate. Enormous sums are being raised for Hillary Clintons candidacy even now, which reinforces the Clintons enormous influence (and gives them good reason to please the big-money crowd).
Headlines like the APs emphasized the gradual deficit reduction theme of President Clintons talk to the Clinton Global Initiative University in Phoenix. The Washington Postreports that President Clinton was given a glowing introduction from Michael Peterson. Peterson heads the right-wing, strongly pro-austerity, and staunchly anti-Social Security Peterson Foundation on behalf of his billionaire father Peter G. Peterson. That introduction, were told, led to an extemporaneous riff about deficit issues (although we wonder how much is truly extemporaneous with this most polished of political performers).
monmouth3
(3,871 posts)albatross around HRC's neck. He has way too much influence on her campaign attempts....
Whisp
(24,096 posts)Just one of which is Hillary's massive failure in the 08 primaries was mostly due to relying on her husband and Mark Penn too much, and they fucked it all up good like the 2 stooges.
Not a very good message for her ability to delegate and take control of management at all, and not a very good message running as a first possible woman president that she takes a back seat to overbearing men.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
Segami
(14,923 posts)Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)All these years -- and a lot of education and political water under the bridge -- I will write in a candidate before I voted for Hillary or any other Wall Street Dem.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)stomach either clinton in public life again. He will be a freaking disaster in the white house. No. just no.
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)A pox on the Democratic Party and the country. Their take-over of the Party is one of the things that has led to our current economic mess, from the repeal of Glass Stegal to the support of the bank bail out to the protection of the financial criminals to the insurance based ACA to the privatization of education.
They have served their Masters well and the country and her People are worse for it.
tiredtoo
(2,949 posts)Myrina
(12,296 posts)... anyone claiming that Hillary as President would lean toward true leftie, liberal/progressive policies is simply deluding themselves.
Steve Martines
(22 posts)Some people in message boards hate him (and the most right wing of right wingers too). That's all.
polichick
(37,152 posts)That's why it all works.
brooklynboy49
(287 posts)And Hillary would be, too.
Right leaning centrist? We don't need no stinking right leaning centrist.
Warren/Sanders '16
jwirr
(39,215 posts)when that leader is from Wall Street.