Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Multiple objects spotted near the new search site (Original Post) malaise Mar 2014 OP
How about we retrieve a few of them? nt B2G Mar 2014 #1
A Chinese ship is on the way and the weather in that area malaise Mar 2014 #2
Excellent. The families need closure. B2G Mar 2014 #3
Something doesn't add up BlueStreak Mar 2014 #4
The explanation made sense to me malaise Mar 2014 #5
If it was flying faster and burned more fuel and crashed 900 miles sooner BlueStreak Mar 2014 #6

malaise

(269,144 posts)
2. A Chinese ship is on the way and the weather in that area
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 09:26 AM
Mar 2014

is much better - additionally the new site is closer to Australia which is very good news for all.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
3. Excellent. The families need closure.
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 09:28 AM
Mar 2014

Thanks for the info. I saw the video of the seas in that area yesterday...amazing.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
4. Something doesn't add up
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 09:36 AM
Mar 2014

First, I said all along that they shoulde be correlating the arc of the hourly pings rather than looking only at the last one. That seems to be what they finally did to get to this new target zone. Why does that take 2 weeks? That seemed like a no-brainer to me.

But here's the thing that doesn't make sense with the Australian press conference. Over and over, they said that the main change is that they now believe the plane was flying much faster and therefore burned more fuel. And the new target zone is 900 miles shorter than the old flight. That is a huge difference. I don't see how the fuel consumption related to speed would make that much difference. Altitude could make that difference, but not speed. And if it was going faster and crashed 900 miles earlier, that means it crashed 2 hours sooner than previously thought. In that case, how sis those last two pings get through?

It does seem that they may be finding debris here, so I hope this is the right location finally. But this gives me practically no confidence in the basic deductive abilities of those working this investigation. My guess is that there are some smart people behind the scenes and those two goofs that held the press conference didn't have a clue.

malaise

(269,144 posts)
5. The explanation made sense to me
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 09:42 AM
Mar 2014

People are using mathematical models and they recalculated based on a different estimate of the aircraft's speed and therefore when would the plane run out of fuel.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/28/mh370-search-shifts-700-miles-closer-to-australia
<snip>
Five aircraft spot 'multiple objects' in new search zone
Photographs of objects being analysed
New search area based on recalculation of plane's speed
Revised zone increases search flight time
Doubt over satellite images of potential debris further south
Relatives to be offered flights to Perth if wreckage is found

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
6. If it was flying faster and burned more fuel and crashed 900 miles sooner
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 10:18 AM
Mar 2014

then that must have happened 2 hours earlier than previously thought. How could the last 2 pings get through if the plane had already crashed?

You said it made sense but you didn't explain why it made sense. Please explain where my reasoning is wrong. It can fly faster and crash at a shorter distance and still stay in the air the same amount of time.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Multiple objects spotted ...