Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

blm

(113,063 posts)
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 02:05 PM Mar 2012

RW logic: Kids should NOT be taught by parents and law enforcement to scream, punch, kick at adult

strangers who approach them too closely, because if the kid tries to fight them off then the adult stranger will have the right to kill the kid in self defense.

I guess RWers will now be teaching their children to quietly accept whatever an adult stranger has in mind whenever they are approached by one.

They never think about logic in their eagerness to excuse what Zimmmerman did.

50 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RW logic: Kids should NOT be taught by parents and law enforcement to scream, punch, kick at adult (Original Post) blm Mar 2012 OP
I think you should be able to hit anyone within 20 feet of you if they look suspicious. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #1
How close did Zimmerman get when he approached the kid? Evidently within arm's length - too close blm Mar 2012 #4
150 feet. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #5
YOU are the one making things up - I asked a logical question that you couldn't answer logically. blm Mar 2012 #9
I don't think "logic" means what you think it does. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #10
Kids are taught to scream, kick, punch when adult stranger approaches them. Yes or No? blm Mar 2012 #12
Why did T's parents let him out so late? Shouldn't he have been in bed? Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #14
Kids taught to fight back and it's re-inforced in their teens by parents AND law enforcement who blm Mar 2012 #15
Please contact the media to let them know what happened. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #16
Keep telling yourself whatever you need to stay standing in that position, Snake... blm Mar 2012 #23
I know that for some it doesn't matter what the evidence says in either direction. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #24
If Zimmerman had a logical reason for approaching an unarmed kid it has not been stated blm Mar 2012 #25
Does it matter if it was logical? Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #26
You omit that Zimmerman had been following him with his car for some time first. When he got out of blm Mar 2012 #27
Has about as much relevance as being suspended for mj instead of tardies. Zero. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #28
You're completely reaching to defend the indefensible and you have no logic behind your position. blm Mar 2012 #31
If you say so. Remember when Z was white and lived in a wealthy gated community? nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #32
and don't forget the kid was out VERY, VERY late, right? According to......you. blm Mar 2012 #36
Yes, 5 year old's should be home eating dinner at that time. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #39
Whatever you say. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #42
blm's facts are precise. Where are your facts? Zalatix Mar 2012 #41
If someone observes me and then asks what I am doing, that does not give me the right to hit them. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #44
Well then for all you know Z should have gotten his ass kicked. Zalatix Mar 2012 #48
No argument there. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #49
jesus christ on a pogo stick CatWoman Mar 2012 #18
A 5 yo? nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #19
or better yet CatWoman Mar 2012 #21
Would have to be a prodigy. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #22
Didn't you read the police report on your own link? Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #30
Out after 5PM?!!! What a miscreant! Zalatix Mar 2012 #43
like a 20 foot neon sign, blm CatWoman Mar 2012 #17
no kidding....for some time now blm Mar 2012 #20
From day one. Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #37
Stuff like this is flypaper blm Mar 2012 #38
Yes, my posts on "Girl wih the Dragon Tattoo" are well documented. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #45
Oh come on Xyzse Mar 2012 #2
For the right wing, there is not bottom as to how low they will go Dawson Leery Mar 2012 #3
Same thing happened with Duke Lacrosse. They muddied the waters until justice was subverted. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #6
Not the same thing, though, is it? Funny how you are reaching so far to excuse Zimmerman when all blm Mar 2012 #11
I am not the one reaching. Just waiting for all the evidence to come out. Unlike some. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #29
You've tried to shoot down logical questions and positions in order to assert counter claims. blm Mar 2012 #33
Let's not pretend that you know what happened either. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #34
I just said the truth about ANY situation like that. You did not. Kid did exactly as taught by blm Mar 2012 #35
If you listen closely to the audio recordings you can hear him yelling "Stranger-Danger!" nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #40
Also, never yell, "Bad touch!" or "Stranger Danger!" Just lay back and enjoy it. n/t Ian David Mar 2012 #7
So,with their logic butterfly77 Mar 2012 #8
Yep - they just don't take the time to think their positions through, and blm Mar 2012 #13
Scream and run. Punching and kicking is something that a child will not do effectively and will... JVS Mar 2012 #46
Good advice. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #47
Yes, but if they're already close to grab you kids are supposed to kick out and keep up a commotion blm Mar 2012 #50

blm

(113,063 posts)
4. How close did Zimmerman get when he approached the kid? Evidently within arm's length - too close
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 02:13 PM
Mar 2012

for ANY kid to be comfortable.

You are grasping because you know you have no logical comeback.

blm

(113,063 posts)
9. YOU are the one making things up - I asked a logical question that you couldn't answer logically.
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 02:35 PM
Mar 2012

So you've resorted to talking nonsense.

blm

(113,063 posts)
12. Kids are taught to scream, kick, punch when adult stranger approaches them. Yes or No?
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 02:49 PM
Mar 2012

Zimmerman was somehow OUT of his car when he claims he was assaulted?

How did he get that close to the kid holding a phone who assaulted him?

Did the kid force Zimmerman to get out of his car and follow him just so he could turn around and assault him?

There is NO LOGIC to any claim that Zimmerman was acting in self-defense, especially since kids are TAUGHT from an early age and it is re-inforced throughout their teens that they are to fight any attempt by an adult to get close enough to them to grab them.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
14. Why did T's parents let him out so late? Shouldn't he have been in bed?
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 02:51 PM
Mar 2012

I like how a 17 yo has now become a 5 yo.

blm

(113,063 posts)
15. Kids taught to fight back and it's re-inforced in their teens by parents AND law enforcement who
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 03:08 PM
Mar 2012

conduct protection classes at the schools. You prefer that a 17yo NOT protect themself as taught when approached by an adult stranger?

Gee, Snake, where do YOU draw the line? You have to pretend that the kid holding the phone approached and assaulted the hulking adult. You'd think Mr Wannabe policeman would have said "Don't come near me or I'll shoot" at the skinny kid who was chasing him and assaulting him.

Some reach you need to have there, Snake. I've seen a whole pack of social media moonies are out and about trying to make the exact same case as you. None have shown an ounce of logic in their claims.

blm

(113,063 posts)
23. Keep telling yourself whatever you need to stay standing in that position, Snake...
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 03:17 PM
Mar 2012

it really has nothing to do with me and everything to do with the logic you need to avoid to maintain your position. Dishonesty only begs for scrutiny and exposure.

blm

(113,063 posts)
25. If Zimmerman had a logical reason for approaching an unarmed kid it has not been stated
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 03:29 PM
Mar 2012

I don't SEE that there is a logical reason based on anything out there so far. My questions for the RWersclaiming that Zimmerman was assaulted remain unanswered.

HOW did a skinny kid talkig on a phone and with NO weapon force a hulking adult WITH a weapon out of his car?

If Zimmerman approached the kid, then at what point does the RW accept that the teen was doing as he'd been taught...to scream, punch and kick the person he felt had come too close to him?

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
26. Does it matter if it was logical?
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 03:35 PM
Mar 2012

No one has the right to assault you if you merely approach them and ask a question. Imagine if this was a woman in Z's place and tell me what the reaction would be.

For all we know, Z grabbed T by the wrist though so we'll have to wait until all the evidence is released.

blm

(113,063 posts)
27. You omit that Zimmerman had been following him with his car for some time first. When he got out of
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 04:07 PM
Mar 2012

his car he was approaching a young person as a hulking adult. If he got close enough to the kid for the kid to throw a punch than that kid was doing EXACTLY as he'd been taught to do throughout his young life.

The kid had NO record of ever hitting or assaulting anyone did he? You think he'd choose a large man who had been following him with his car and who he said on the phone that he was uncomfortable about it as the first person he planned to assault?

You really have some reach there, Snake. All to absolve the shooter of an unarmed kid. You'd have to believe the phone records were manufactured to excuse what Zimmerman did. But - I'm pretty sure you know Zimmerman shot the kid unfairly but your 'side' is invested in the imagery you need to keep yourself deluded about your country.

blm

(113,063 posts)
31. You're completely reaching to defend the indefensible and you have no logic behind your position.
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 05:10 PM
Mar 2012

Not unlike the tough corner the RW will often paint themselves into, time and time again just to pretend to themselves that they aren't just assholes.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
39. Yes, 5 year old's should be home eating dinner at that time.
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 07:02 PM
Mar 2012


You may want to read the entire post.
 

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)
41. blm's facts are precise. Where are your facts?
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 07:06 PM
Mar 2012

If someone follows your kid in a car and then gets out to confront them, do you expect the kid to let himself get assaulted? I think not.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
44. If someone observes me and then asks what I am doing, that does not give me the right to hit them.
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 07:10 PM
Mar 2012

If Z's account is accurate. For all I or anyone knows, Z grabbed him first, but I'll wait to hear more.

Uncle Joe

(58,364 posts)
30. Didn't you read the police report on your own link?
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 04:26 PM
Mar 2012
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=473423

"Getting out of a car does not entitle you to hit anyone. Please read the police report before

making comments."

http://sanfordfl.gov/investigation/trayvon_martin.html

"Trayvon Martin Investigation"

http://www.sanfordfl.gov/investigation/docs/Twin%20Lakes%20Shooting%20Initial%20Report.pdf

Trayon was shot and killed between 5:17 and 5:30pm, that's hardly late for a 17 year old even if that 17 year old is/was much closer to 16 than 18, date of birth being 2/5.









 

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)
43. Out after 5PM?!!! What a miscreant!
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 07:08 PM
Mar 2012

Who knew that an evil brown kid would dare be out that late in the darkest of dark hours????

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
3. For the right wing, there is not bottom as to how low they will go
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 02:09 PM
Mar 2012

to discredit minorities and protect the right wing laws supporting gun ownership.

blm

(113,063 posts)
11. Not the same thing, though, is it? Funny how you are reaching so far to excuse Zimmerman when all
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 02:39 PM
Mar 2012

that needs doing is for his defense attorney to explain how it all happened so it can be examined through the LOGIC PRISM that you apparently find uncomfortable.

I would merely BET that the defense attorney will be somewhat uncomfortable himself in that pursuit.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
29. I am not the one reaching. Just waiting for all the evidence to come out. Unlike some.
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 04:17 PM
Mar 2012

Z may be guilty as sin, but I'm willing to consider all the evidence before I start piling on. Especially when it's this emotionally charged.

blm

(113,063 posts)
33. You've tried to shoot down logical questions and positions in order to assert counter claims.
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 05:13 PM
Mar 2012

So, please let's not pretend that you are merely 'waiting' as you've reached pretty far already to latch onto the kid 'assaulted' the shooter position.

blm

(113,063 posts)
35. I just said the truth about ANY situation like that. You did not. Kid did exactly as taught by
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 06:19 PM
Mar 2012

parents and law enforcement. Zimmerman did exactly what he was told by law enforcement NOT to do that night.

No honest parent would claim otherwise.

 

butterfly77

(17,609 posts)
8. So,with their logic
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 02:31 PM
Mar 2012

if a pedophile approaches a kid,or pretends to be law enforcement. The child should let them have their way.

blm

(113,063 posts)
13. Yep - they just don't take the time to think their positions through, and
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 02:50 PM
Mar 2012

if they did they wouldn't have 99% of their positions, would they?

JVS

(61,935 posts)
46. Scream and run. Punching and kicking is something that a child will not do effectively and will...
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 07:12 PM
Mar 2012

increase their level of danger. Never try to fight off a grown up, run and seek a grown up you know and trust.

blm

(113,063 posts)
50. Yes, but if they're already close to grab you kids are supposed to kick out and keep up a commotion
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 09:58 PM
Mar 2012

to attract attention.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»RW logic: Kids should NOT...