Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 10:35 AM Mar 2012

Court Opens Health-Care Debate With Law That Might Derail Case

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-26/court-opens-health-care-debate-with-law-that-might-derail-case.html

The U.S. Supreme Court opens today its historic review of President Barack Obama’s health- care law, three days of arguments that might result in the president’s premier legislative achievement being found unconstitutional in the middle of his re-election campaign.

The court will determine the fate of a measure designed to extend insurance to about 32 million people and revamp an industry that accounts for 18 percent of the U.S. economy.

The six hours of planned debate is the most on a case in 44 years. The core dispute -- the law’s upcoming mandate that uninsured people purchase coverage -- comes on the second day.

First, the justices today hear arguments on a seemingly arcane question: Does the penalty for failing to get insurance amount to a tax?
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court Opens Health-Care Debate With Law That Might Derail Case (Original Post) xchrom Mar 2012 OP
Who gets the money? CAPHAVOC Mar 2012 #1
we would have to go back to "pre-existing conditions" rainy Mar 2012 #2

rainy

(6,091 posts)
2. we would have to go back to "pre-existing conditions"
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 11:35 AM
Mar 2012

otherwise people would just wait until they are sick to get insurance. That's the whole point of making everyine buy insurance, so they don't wait until they are sick to get it and Obamacare has eleminated pre-existing conditions so there would be no reason to get insurance first.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Court Opens Health-Care D...