Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malaise

(269,023 posts)
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 06:44 AM Mar 2012

Dick Cheney’s heart transplant rekindles age debate

http://bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2012/03/25/dick-cheney-heart-transplant-rekindles-debate-about-age-limit/eSNFfq21iKKowusiCqGxNJ/story.html
<snip>
Doctors say it is unlikely that former Vice President Dick Cheney, who is 71, got special treatment when he was given a new heart that thousands of younger people also were in line to receive.

Still, his case reopens debate about whether rules should be changed to favor youth over age in giving out scarce organs. As it stands now, time on the waiting list, medical need, and where you live determine the odds of receiving a new heart - not how many years you will live to make use of it.

“The ethical issues are not that he had a transplant, but who didn’t?’’ Dr. Eric Topol, a cardiologist at Scripps Health in La Jolla, Calif., wrote on Twitter.

“We have done several patients hovering around age 70’’ although that’s about “the upper limit’’ for a transplant, said Dr. Mariell Jessup, a University of Pennsylvania heart failure specialist and American Heart Association spokeswoman. “The fact he waited such a long time shows he didn’t get any favors.’’
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

onenote

(42,704 posts)
2. Only an issue for those that think that the government and doctors should play god
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 08:13 AM
Mar 2012

Personally, I don't want medical decisions to be made based on anything other than medical criteria. For anyone.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
3. At some point doesn't the world court take over the prosecution of war criminals?
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 08:20 AM
Mar 2012

After it is shown that the country where they reside or where they committed these war crimes can't or won't prosecute them themselves.
If I remember correctly Spain is where the world court is convened due to the fact they were not involved with the second world war so were seen as impartial so the honor went to them.
Cheney I hope you have a few more years left in your old war mongering ass.


Maybe I'm misremembering all this if so mybad

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dick Cheney’s heart trans...