Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Are_grits_groceries

(17,111 posts)
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 04:02 AM Mar 2012

The Power of Prosecutors: Hiding evidence that would have exonerated a man who was convicted.

Back in 1987, Michael Morton was convicted of murdering his wife. Upon being led to prison, he vowed that he was innocent, telling onlookers "I did not do this."
After almost 25 years in prison, DNA evidence proved that Morton was innocent, with samples connecting a different male to his wife's slaying. Morton was freed on Oct. 4, 2011, and "60 Minutes" brought his case into the national spotlight on Sunday.
<snip>
As the case wore on, Morton and his attorneys sensed that there was evidence that would have exonerated him. But they were never given full access to the police reports in the prosecutor's file.
Morton and his original trial lawyers always suspected there was evidence that would have helped establish his innocence, that [Williamson County District Attorney Ken] Anderson wasn't telling them about. But they were never given full access to the police reports in the prosecutor's file. It wasn't until recently, after years of legal wrangling, that lawyers Barry Scheck and Nina Morrison of The Innocence Project, and John Raley, a private attorney in Houston, finally got a look at Anderson's file from the original trial.

John Raley: It was one of those moments where you almost f-- you almost faint. To hold in my hand a copy of a document that the district attorney at the time had and didn't tell anybody about it on the defense side...
Lara Logan: That document would've proved what?
John Raley: Would've proved that Michael Morton is innocent.

<snip>
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/25/michael-morton-60-minutes_n_1378773.html

More about real perpetrator:
GEORGETOWN — Mark Alan Norwood, a 57-year-old Bastrop resident, was arrested today and charged with the 1986 murder of Christine Morton. Michael Morton, her husband, was exonerated of her murder last month after spending nearly 25 years in prison, when DNA connected Norwood to the Morton murder and to the murder of another Austin woman, Debra Masters Baker.

Williamson County Sheriffs Office Sgt. John Foster said Norwood was arrested at his Bastrop home and that police had known his whereabouts since his DNA was identified in August. He is being held on a capital murder charge; his bond is set at $750,000.
http://tinyurl.com/6sglaqv

This is appalling and scarey. He knew Morton was innocent.
The women who were murdered afterwards by the real killer are on his head.



5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Power of Prosecutors: Hiding evidence that would have exonerated a man who was convicted. (Original Post) Are_grits_groceries Mar 2012 OP
Happens time and time again Mopar151 Mar 2012 #1
Yet another in the long list of reasons why capital punishment must be abolished Orrex Mar 2012 #2
I don't know... Leftist Agitator Mar 2012 #3
I watched this last night on 60 Minutes.. Upton Mar 2012 #4
They knew the murderer's DNA since August? Waited til March to arrest him? SharonAnn Mar 2012 #5

Mopar151

(9,983 posts)
1. Happens time and time again
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 04:30 AM
Mar 2012

And not just in big cases. Malicious prosecution should be a crime! Yet when another one of these cases comes up, the victims families sometimes put up a big stink, or the cops / prosecutors act like innocence was a mere technicality!
If the defense were to pay off a witness by reducing charges, or employ an "informant" who is in effect, licensed to commit crimes,the hue and cry would be enormous.

 

Leftist Agitator

(2,759 posts)
3. I don't know...
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 07:43 AM
Mar 2012

I could make a pretty strong argument that the corrupt prosecutor should die for what he did.

Upton

(9,709 posts)
4. I watched this last night on 60 Minutes..
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 07:53 AM
Mar 2012

the prosecutor apparently hid evidence, costing this guy 25 years of his life.. He should go to jail for the same amount of time Morton spent there...I'm tired of prosecutors having immunity to lie and send innocent people to prison..

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Power of Prosecutors:...