Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would flying at 45,000 feet have any effect on the passengers? (Original Post) Renew Deal Mar 2014 OP
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #1
I just read something else about flying high Renew Deal Mar 2014 #4
The 43K limit isn't the absolute maximum, and 45K isn't much higher than 43K. pnwmom Mar 2014 #2
Unless the cabin is depressurized, not likely. NuclearDem Mar 2014 #3
It's sounding more like an accident, malfunction than terrorism, piracy flamingdem Mar 2014 #5
The problem is the transponder. mn9driver Mar 2014 #7
If that is for certain I wonder why the talking heads are floating flamingdem Mar 2014 #8
It was hijacked. morningfog Mar 2014 #9
Thanks for the heads up n/t flamingdem Mar 2014 #10
By itself, no. mn9driver Mar 2014 #6
Where is this info coming from? longship Mar 2014 #11
Unnamed Malaysian "officials" Renew Deal Mar 2014 #12
Details? No citation? nt longship Mar 2014 #13
Nothing yet, but the press conference should be starting "soon" Renew Deal Mar 2014 #14
I don't believe the 45,000 ft claim for a second. longship Mar 2014 #15
The altitude claim had a disclaimer Renew Deal Mar 2014 #16
Yup! Who could have predicted that? longship Mar 2014 #17
The altitude info was from military radar, not civilian IDemo Mar 2014 #18
a pilot told me he doubted the accuracy of the altitude information base on Malaysian military radar Skittles Mar 2014 #19
If the cabin is pressurized, no. PlanetaryOrbit Mar 2014 #20
Unless something happened to the cabin itself, no sakabatou Mar 2014 #21

Response to Renew Deal (Original post)

Renew Deal

(81,861 posts)
4. I just read something else about flying high
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 12:06 AM
Mar 2014
Depending on the direction, speed and altitude of its flight, investigators estimate the jet could have had less than an hour's worth of fuel left at the point of the last satellite signal. But if the plane stayed high to be more efficient, it could have had significantly more fuel left at that point.


http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304185104579439403486098062

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
2. The 43K limit isn't the absolute maximum, and 45K isn't much higher than 43K.
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 12:02 AM
Mar 2014

So it's unlikely the passengers would have been affected.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
3. Unless the cabin is depressurized, not likely.
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 12:03 AM
Mar 2014

Though knowing they're 45k feet up could be frightening.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
5. It's sounding more like an accident, malfunction than terrorism, piracy
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 12:10 AM
Mar 2014

to me. Perhaps they tried to go higher because they lost navigational ability and knew they would need the fuel.

etc.

mn9driver

(4,426 posts)
7. The problem is the transponder.
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 12:29 AM
Mar 2014

Since the plane flew for an extended period after it stopped, and the Satcom link was periodically pinging during that time, it means that the aircraft had normal electrical power available to it and the transponder was just turned off. The Satcom link is not wired into the standby electrical system, so if there was a major power failure that killed the transponder, the Satcom link would have gone out as well. It didn't.

Meaning someone almost certainly deliberately turned off the transponder. Who did that, and why? Nobody knows.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
8. If that is for certain I wonder why the talking heads are floating
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 12:42 AM
Mar 2014

the lithium battery story and other incident related theories.

I guess it's easier than imagining some nut wanting to take out that many innocents. Wonder if we'll ever know.

mn9driver

(4,426 posts)
6. By itself, no.
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 12:16 AM
Mar 2014

Many passenger aircraft fly at that altitude and higher, including some models of the 747 and almost all long range corporate jets. The Concorde typically flew at up to 61,000 feet.

If the cabin was depressurized at that altitude, anyone without supplemental oxygen would die in a fairly short period of time. That's why there are emergency masks that drop automatically at each passenger seat if there is a depressurization event. Those masks are typically good for around 20 minutes, during which time the pilots are supposed to rapidly descend to 10,000 feet so that people can breathe once the oxygen runs out.

If the airplane depressurizes at high altitude and the pilots do not descend (their oxygen mask system is separate and lasts longer), once the passenger emergency oxygen is used up, it's lights out. No sane pilot would allow that to happen. It would effectively be mass murder.

longship

(40,416 posts)
11. Where is this info coming from?
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 01:10 AM
Mar 2014

A citation would be very helpful here. Especially since this seems like an implausible scenario.

Thanks.

Renew Deal

(81,861 posts)
12. Unnamed Malaysian "officials"
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 01:14 AM
Mar 2014

But it has been picked up by many of the big sources. MSNBC broke into prison documentaries to report it. Also seen it on ABC, Sky, Hindustan Times, and several others.

longship

(40,416 posts)
15. I don't believe the 45,000 ft claim for a second.
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 01:55 AM
Mar 2014

And I have not seen a single mention in the major news sites.

Thanks for the link. It has not started yet. These things never begin on schedule.

Renew Deal

(81,861 posts)
16. The altitude claim had a disclaimer
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 02:00 AM
Mar 2014

The disclaimer was that accuracy couldn't be guaranteed after the transponder was turned off.

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
18. The altitude info was from military radar, not civilian
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 05:11 AM
Mar 2014

As one expert explained last night, military radar doesn't rely on enemy planes advertising their position with transponders; there is additional geometry built in to supply altitude info.

Skittles

(153,169 posts)
19. a pilot told me he doubted the accuracy of the altitude information base on Malaysian military radar
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 05:18 AM
Mar 2014

yes indeed

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would flying at 45,000 fe...