Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The New Meet the Press Host (Original Post) Pryderi Mar 2014 OP
Ann Curry nt LiberalEsto Mar 2014 #1
I agree. She's earned it, and she's so smart and personable. babylonsister Mar 2014 #6
Really? bigwillq Mar 2014 #20
She's horrible! RiffRandell Mar 2014 #55
Earnest Ann? Oy vey! nt valerief Mar 2014 #24
Rachel Maddow would be the best host. cui bono Mar 2014 #2
Second. NuclearDem Mar 2014 #18
She'd be GREAT! cilla4progress Mar 2014 #56
yup--she would strike fear into the hearts of cons librechik Mar 2014 #58
That won't matter. It will be someone young. Avalux Mar 2014 #3
Luke Russert CatholicEdHead Mar 2014 #4
ugh. n/t Pryderi Mar 2014 #8
Except that he sucks even more than his dad. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2014 #9
Luke Russert: Cub Reporter. Hekate Mar 2014 #43
Luke Russert - Cub Fluff Boy hatrack Mar 2014 #49
He's the broadcast equivalent of DimSon KamaAina Mar 2014 #62
I think Martin Bashir would be perfect. BlueCaliDem Mar 2014 #5
I love and miss him; ain't gonna happen. Having said babylonsister Mar 2014 #11
I love and miss him, too, babylonsister. I loved how he asked the hard questions BlueCaliDem Mar 2014 #15
Mr. Ed. pangaia Mar 2014 #7
Is that you Wiiilllbbuuurrrrrrr? AAO Mar 2014 #34
Neeeeeiiiiiiiigh..... pangaia Mar 2014 #46
They should have FOUR - rotate them each week. Such as Maddow, Kornacki, O'Donnell, and one other. Tx4obama Mar 2014 #10
Dammit, great idea! Send it to the knucklehead powers! nt babylonsister Mar 2014 #13
I think this is a great idea as well (n/t) Samantha Mar 2014 #39
I like it! Very good idea. nt Hekate Mar 2014 #44
That is a fantastic idea. It also wouldn't allow the coziness of myrna minx Mar 2014 #47
Add Joy Reid to that list brush Mar 2014 #51
Melissa or Joy WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2014 #12
Something compels me to say Awknid Mar 2014 #14
Mrs. Greespan Politicalboi Mar 2014 #16
If not Rachel, then why not Ed Schultz CatholicEdHead Mar 2014 #17
'cause he's a goof. A lovable goof. BlueStreak Mar 2014 #22
Ed's a bit of a blowhard. I wish him well, but he would not draw me back to MTP. nt Hekate Mar 2014 #45
It has to be someone perceived as non-biased BainsBane Mar 2014 #53
He fights the good fight but he's not that knowledgable. cui bono Mar 2014 #60
Lawrence O'Donnell karynnj Mar 2014 #19
Yes! pscot Mar 2014 #26
This makes the most sense. nt valerief Mar 2014 #27
Agreed. Pryderi Mar 2014 #32
He would be pretty good, I think (n/t) Samantha Mar 2014 #40
Jiminy Glick kwassa Mar 2014 #21
Ed Grimley pscot Mar 2014 #28
He does have the moves. kwassa Mar 2014 #29
Seth Meyers and Amy Poehler. geek tragedy Mar 2014 #23
Maybe they can woo that Cupp creep back from Fox. nt valerief Mar 2014 #25
"What's Up With That"'s DeAndre Cole kwassa Mar 2014 #30
Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert so it can be Fair & Balanced! nt Walk away Mar 2014 #31
I think NBC should just scrap "Meet the Press' RoverSuswade Mar 2014 #33
This right here ^^^ Because it's still going to be right-wing crap no matter who sits in the chair. ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2014 #36
Family story about "The Lawrence Welk Show" csziggy Mar 2014 #38
Bingo! earthside Mar 2014 #54
I haven't cared about MTP in years. Vashta Nerada Mar 2014 #59
Keith Olbermann - he would grind up McCain and his buddy Lindsey Fucking Graham. AAO Mar 2014 #35
They would have to make that pay-for-view (and I surely would happily pay for that) Samantha Mar 2014 #41
Just think of the RATINGS, NBC!!! AAO Mar 2014 #61
Keith as MTP Mod would be the Holy Grail of TV programming. RoverSuswade Mar 2014 #57
Triumph. A-Schwarzenegger Mar 2014 #37
piers morgan JI7 Mar 2014 #42
Joe Scarborough africanadian Mar 2014 #48
Howard Stern! n/t leeroysphitz Mar 2014 #50
Rachel or Lawrence... chillfactor Mar 2014 #52

babylonsister

(171,074 posts)
6. I agree. She's earned it, and she's so smart and personable.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 09:43 PM
Mar 2014

I doubt it would happen, but would be happily surprised if she got that seat. They'd probably go w/Savannah Guthrie before Ann due to age.

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
55. She's horrible!
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 10:36 AM
Mar 2014

When she read the news on the Today show not a day went by when she didn't flub her lines.

I stopped watching it because of her and love GMA...except for George.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
2. Rachel Maddow would be the best host.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 09:41 PM
Mar 2014

Good interviewer and does her research so she has the facts and only lets facts stand.

cilla4progress

(24,738 posts)
56. She'd be GREAT!
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 11:39 AM
Mar 2014

SHE's earned it (though I do love Ann Curry; I like her best out in the field where her compassion really shows.).

Listend to Rachel on the missing airliner last week, it hit me: she's a fabulous oral story-teller. Those first 15 minutes of her show every night are just riveting, no matter the topic!

librechik

(30,674 posts)
58. yup--she would strike fear into the hearts of cons
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 11:52 AM
Mar 2014

who won't go on her show but might be compelled to show up on MTP

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
3. That won't matter. It will be someone young.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 09:41 PM
Mar 2014

They're going to make it all shiny and new and flashy for the younger folks and stick a youthful person in the chair.

Hekate

(90,715 posts)
43. Luke Russert: Cub Reporter.
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 02:52 AM
Mar 2014

Sorry, he should still be somebody's sidekick/apprentice until he grows up and gets some gravitas.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
5. I think Martin Bashir would be perfect.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 09:41 PM
Mar 2014

He's a true journalist who won't allow Republicans OR Democrats to pull a fast one on him. But he asks the hard questions and corporate America would never choose him.

Rachel Maddow is a good choice, too. She'd get those viewership ratings up in a couple of weeks! But I don't want to miss her during the week and I doubt she'd want to work six days a week!

babylonsister

(171,074 posts)
11. I love and miss him; ain't gonna happen. Having said
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 09:46 PM
Mar 2014

that, he recovered from the debacle that was supposed to be about Michael Jackson? Maybe he's really a cat with a few lives left?

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
15. I love and miss him, too, babylonsister. I loved how he asked the hard questions
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 09:53 PM
Mar 2014

and made them squirm!

Who knows? Maybe the head honchos will take another look at him? After all, just like you said, he's a (cool) cat with a few lives left.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
10. They should have FOUR - rotate them each week. Such as Maddow, Kornacki, O'Donnell, and one other.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 09:45 PM
Mar 2014

That way they would have a lot of time to do research and compose good questions regarding whatever topic they are going to talk about,
and they wouldn't have to give up their week night shows.

Just an idea

myrna minx

(22,772 posts)
47. That is a fantastic idea. It also wouldn't allow the coziness of
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 09:24 AM
Mar 2014

the weekly McCain and Graham power hour.

brush

(53,792 posts)
51. Add Joy Reid to that list
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 09:56 AM
Mar 2014

She's right up there with Maddow and Bashir in asking the tough questions and having facts at her disposal.

Awknid

(381 posts)
14. Something compels me to say
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 09:50 PM
Mar 2014

Andrea Mitchell. Although Rachel Maddow would be a dream come true, but a somewhat waste of talent.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
16. Mrs. Greespan
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 09:57 PM
Mar 2014

I'm sorry but,

She has enough money already. Martin Bashir or Rachel Maddow, or the weekly switch. IMO Mrs. Greenspan belongs at Faux.

CatholicEdHead

(9,740 posts)
17. If not Rachel, then why not Ed Schultz
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 09:58 PM
Mar 2014

And base it in Fargo, ND, close to Ed's home.

Maybe in the KVLY/KXJB studios in Fargo. Fly everyone from DCA to MSP to FAR weekly.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
22. 'cause he's a goof. A lovable goof.
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 10:10 PM
Mar 2014

But it would be a better show with Ed than it has been for 25 years. It might even be worth watching sometimes.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
60. He fights the good fight but he's not that knowledgable.
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 02:04 PM
Mar 2014

He would not be able to keep up with the facts and call them on things as they are said.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
19. Lawrence O'Donnell
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 10:02 PM
Mar 2014

A liberal, but not as partisan as some others. He has a very calm demeanor as he engages in thoughtful discussion with various people - over the Democratic portion of the political spectrum. Unlike a few others, it would not be a reach for him to moderate over the full political spectrum.

His background is eclectic enough to make him both interesting and very competent discussing complex issues. He was a former chief of staff of the Senate Finance committee under Moynihan. On any economic or tax issue, he is among the best anywhere explaining what options Congress has. (Even on other issues, his ability to read a piece of Congressional legislation and interpret it was seen when he - long before anyone -even in Congress - looked at the law itself on the "IRS scandal" issue. )

I love Rachel Maddow, but I am not sure she would be comfortable taking a neutral role. (Forget Ed Schultz - his opinion may change, but what doesn't change is his very strong advocacy for his position. This is NOT a negative where he is, but not for a moderator.

RoverSuswade

(641 posts)
33. I think NBC should just scrap "Meet the Press'
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 11:05 PM
Mar 2014

and start showing reruns of "The Lawrence Welk Show."
I might start watching again.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
38. Family story about "The Lawrence Welk Show"
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 01:08 AM
Mar 2014

My parents loved watching it a did so faithfully every weekend when the local educational station showed it. With Dad passing away last summer, I made a special effort to visit Mom as often as possible. Over Thanksgiving weekend, Mom turned to Lawrence Welk. It was a retrospective, showing the cast members and their children over the years.

Mom was talking about how many years it had run, so I went to the computer to look up when it had started. On Wikipedia I found out that the last original show was filmed in 1982 though updates with a little added material were made for at least a while. When I told Mom, she was outraged, "You mean I've been watching re-runs for over thirty years!?"

When we visited Mom in January, for the first time I can remember on a weekend, she did NOT turn over to Lawrence Welk. I wish I had looked it up on the internet years ago!

earthside

(6,960 posts)
54. Bingo!
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 10:34 AM
Mar 2014

The Sunday morning news/politics shows are relics of the past.

They cannot help but be little more than outlets for establishment/corporate propaganda.

I stopped watching them a couple of decades ago.

By the time Sunday morning rolls around, who doesn't already know what John McCain thinks, or the other half dozen regular 'guests' that they 'interview' have to say?

In the age of MSNBC, CNN, Aljazeera and Fox-PAC 'News' ... who needs 'Meet the Press'?

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
41. They would have to make that pay-for-view (and I surely would happily pay for that)
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 02:42 AM
Mar 2014

I can dream, can't I? I love LOVE to see Keith Olbermann and Ted Cruse go at it.

Sam

RoverSuswade

(641 posts)
57. Keith as MTP Mod would be the Holy Grail of TV programming.
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 11:48 AM
Mar 2014

Won't happen tho. NBC execs' heads too full of poo.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The New Meet the Press Ho...