General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan you see what's wrong in this picture ?
Or the whole affair, for that matter. I can't identify even one person that needs or would be affected by other peoples contraceptive issues....
Protesters condemn contraception coverage in health insurance mandate
[URL=/][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
More than 1,000 people from throughout Northeast Ohio gathered at the Free Stamp sculpture next to Cleveland City Hall Friday to condemn President Obama's new rule mandating that health insurance plans cover contraception.
Prior to the prayer rally, the group attended Mass at St. John's Cathedral where Bishop Richard Lennon of the Catholic Diocese of Cleveland proclaimed in his sermon that the White House mandate, which affects some faith-based institutions, is an attack on freedom of religion.
The bishop's words were met with a standing ovation in the packed, 1,200-seat cathedral.
After Mass, the crowd, carrying protest signs, rosaries, American flags and babies, walked to the Free Stamp, which is across the street from the Anthony J. Celebrezze Federal Building, a symbol of the Obama government.
http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2012/03/protesters_condemn_president_o.html
Robeysays
(673 posts)haha, nah looks like a bunch of folks who don't or can't have sex.
RC
(25,592 posts)JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Funny too.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)They made a point of wearing red, for sure.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)The Doctor.
(17,266 posts)Really, it's simple psychology.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)cynatnite
(31,011 posts)It's people exercising their rights to protest. That's all.
I had my tubes tied and have BP problems. I will never take BCP's. That does not negate my right to protest attempts to limit other women who might need contraception. I'm not personally affected, but I will still stand up for those who are.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)but there's a lot more going on here than just protesting ones rights. These people are trying to trample on the rights of others when no one was or is doing anything that affects THEM, all the while pretending someone is trying to take their religious freedom.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)jaysunb
(11,856 posts)to promote the possible harming of others in the name of your religious or politcal views it's being a bully in my opinion.
And btw, the purpose of the post was to point out the ages and gender of the people involved in something that has absolutely nothing to do w/ their religious freedom and everything to do w/ infringing on the rights of others.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)They were protesting women's access to free contraception because of their religious views. They are wrong, of course, but they have every right as Americans to hold up their signs and express their views.
The ages and gender has nothing to do with the issue at hand. In their minds, it's a religious thing...well most of their minds.
I think some of it is they do it just because they hate Obama. If Obama was saving puppies from getting ran over by ninjas, they'd protest.
No matter how much we disagree with these people or question their motives, they have every right to protest.
arthritisR_US
(7,291 posts)politicize from the pulpit then damn well pay their fair share like the rest of us.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Tey must be met in the realm of ideas. Personally I see nothing wrong about people protesting, no matter how much I disagree with them.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)I wonder if they turned down Medicare or social security?
The Catholic church also needs it's tax exempt status revoked. The Vatican doesn't need more tax-free dollars from the US.
libinnyandia
(1,374 posts)ideas the protesters are promoting. The teabaggers have a right to protest. The ideas they promote are evil.
chnoutte
(36 posts)willing to give up their rights to men and the government.
Amaril
(1,267 posts)My second thought..........what about those of us who DON'T believe that life begins at ejaculation? Are we not entitled to religious freedom (as in, freedom FROM religion) too?
chnoutte
(36 posts)suffer from the tyranny of the majority.
Always remember that knowledge is the enemy of faith
uppityperson
(115,678 posts)Not necessarily the majority at all. I've lived in small communities where the majority were "those who don't believe in fairy tales" but the minority fundamnetalist religionsists banded together, organized themselves and ran things rather than letting others be. Outspoken minority who organize themselves rather than the herd of cats "live and let live" follks.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)in my view. No one is threatening their religious freedom. In fact, laws protecting the right to be protected from other people forcing their religion on you protects them as well. How would they like it if all us Buddhists formed a political lobby to force compassion, self-reflection and wisdom on everybody?
Religious Freedom, to them, means, Everyone must go by MY rules.
Ship of Fools
(1,453 posts)I never understood that argument...I'm way past menopause, but I
believe in a woman's right to abortion. Would I be identified in a picture
as someone who wouldn't be affected by a woman's right to choose?
This is an honest question, btw. Please don't read any snark into it.
I'm truly trying to understand that perspective.
Thanks.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)right to choose your path as opposed to trying to take those rights for others. they can't have it both ways.....
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)underpants
(182,863 posts)The individual mandate was a demand by health insurance companies going back to Hillary's efforts n 1983. They demanded it and....as usual ... got it