General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsItaly up in arms over Michelangelo's David rifle advert (BBC)
Italy's culture minister has expressed outrage over an advertisement by a US weapons firm showing Michelangelo's David holding a rifle.
Dario Franceschini said the image was offensive and violated the law.
A number of Italian media web sites carried the image of the advertisement showing David holding a bolt-action rifle.
The advertisement, from Illinois-based ArmaLite, carries the line "a work of art" in promoting the $3,000 rifle.
***
more: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26501460
Apparently, the Italian gov't holds copyright to the statue and limits the use of images of it. Who knew ?
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Nobody worships the David statue..it is art...it's been used in many ad campaigns
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)and respect it.
Crepuscular
(1,057 posts)crass commercialism is not limited to just American gun companies. If you order this "David" apron from this company, they will throw in a free key chain!
http://www.romegiftshop.com/apdavmadinit.html
Disguising angst about guns as outrage about the misuse of "art" is a hard sell.
MADem
(135,425 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)and tourists like to buy them.
In all my trips to Italy I've seen those aprons and post cards, but never one distorting the original or involving guns.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)I doubt it. Chalk this one under free speech.
jsr
(7,712 posts)It is required to recognize the copyright of works of authors from other members.
NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)It's considered prior art.
jsr
(7,712 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Come to think of it, she would look good as a gull-color inlay on the stock of my Stevens 311D double-barrel; the stock is so-o-o-o Roy Rogers.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)Should be as much in public domain as any other work. ..thinking Mona Lisa, American Gothic, etc.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)sculpt him. He is seen as a celebration of the whole idea of the republic of Florence, which it tried nobly to maintain and is a part of the history of human struggle against oligarchic systems and for government by and for the people. Florence lost its republic due to the machinations, lies and deceit by the Medici family and subsequently lost its status in artistic dominance and the show moved on to Rome and the subsequent (after Mannerism) emergence of the Baroque period. It is estimated that some 80% of western art's top treasures are in Florence.
Florence is different and it is special.
MADem
(135,425 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)next weekend and I'll be in Tuscany, near Florence. I'll ask folks there and give DU a report...
MADem
(135,425 posts)Wonderful people. HORRIBLE government(s). They aren't above a bit of official hypocrisy, IMO.
As I've said elsewhere, I think this is more about market share than anything else.
Here's one of Beretta's products, perhaps they're ticked that THEY didn't think of it first...?
Orrex
(63,228 posts)Such base hypocrisy!
eppur_se_muova
(36,301 posts)not a $3K brand name sling.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)Genesis 1:1
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth and the fully automatic AR-15 with flash suppressor.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)flamin lib
(14,559 posts)question everything
(47,544 posts)This is my rifle and this is my gun... etc.
Crepuscular
(1,057 posts)Italy better not threaten to sue the Pastafarians or they will incur the wrath of the FSM, Aaarr!
[IMG][/IMG]
muriel_volestrangler
(101,385 posts)That's pretty good selection.
Crepuscular
(1,057 posts)One use is about marketing a legal product and the other is about exposing stupidity. In any case, it's selective outrage, to claim copyright infringement in one case and not the other unless you favor legal enforcement based on arbitrary subjective criteria.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,385 posts)So - for-profit killing vs. not-for-profit humour to expose stupidity. Again, to be selective here would show good judgement. Though we see they have argued with Wikipedia about 'cultural heritage' pictures too.
NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)I don't give the slightest fuck whether it's legal or not in Italy. It's a US ad and last I checked the First amendment granted us free speech.
I'm getting sick and tired of the constant encroachment on rights I see here. Free speech is going to piss some people off from time to time.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,385 posts)As the article says, "A number of Italian media web sites carried the image of the advertisement showing David holding a bolt-action rifle.". This is about advertising in Italy.
If ArmaLite is so careless (a careless gun enthusiast? Who woulda thunk it?) that it's spending money in places it doesn't sell its arms, maybe this will get them to run their business better.
NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)The Italian sites took an American ad and displayed it on their sites for commentary. Your comment on carelessness with respect to the World Wide Web is just priceless.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)I think other Americans should support our Bill of Rights.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)An American company made an ad for American consumers, they saw it and got annoyed. If that was all, I wouldn't care. Instead you have people on DU championing their cause. I take a very hardline stance with our civil liberties like freedom of speech.
If I wanted to live under Italian laws, I'd move there.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)Florence, who have their own ideas about what our American culture has wrought upon their cultural treasure. They think it is disrespectful and I do too. It has nothing to do with the First Amendment.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Not just the apron noted elsewhere, they also make David penis shorts, with the member silkscreened into an anatomically correct locale.
And I don't think they are angry about the product. After all, it's not like they are anti-gun in Italy--at least not in terms of crafting and selling them. They make a huge amount of cash from weapons that they sell all over the world.
What they might have a problem with, though, is people cutting into THEIR market share.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Italian_submachine_guns
http://www.beretta.com/en-us/
Interesting article and commentary: http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-beretta-brady-20140213%2C0%2C4806019.story
http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2014-02-21/news/bs-ed-italy-20140221_1_double-standard-u-s-gun-violence-gun-manufacturers
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)Nobody disputes that they make berettas (berrete?). Don't you wonder why they care so much about the David, tho?
MADem
(135,425 posts)So, I dunno....it's not ALL art, it's just "some" art, I guess.
Of course, old Mona is in France, even though she was painted by an Italiano...!
Honestly? I think this is faux poutrage on the part of some Italians with a business interest. That's just my sense--I could be wrong, but I lived there for seven years, and I've seen this kind of overly dramatic hyperspin even before the days of the internet! The whole "I am affronted/offended" routine gets old, like the boy who cried wolf.
They didn't go after these guys for their "misappropriation," but I guess the message didn't interfere with their commerce, either:
I think the advertisement is tacky, but I think the response to it is OTT.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)to the Italians...what can I tell you.
When you lived there, were you in the military?
MADem
(135,425 posts)They do have limits on personal firearms, though most of my neighbors had them for "hunting" -- I was the neighborhood oddball, I didn't have anything save a barking dog.
I do think this is more about encroachment into their market share using their imagery. The Italians are fairly big players in the arms sales game. Not just weaponry, but military aircraft as well.
Yes, I was in the military but I lived in the community. I never lived on an installation and didn't center my life around my work.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)geez what a dump that place is! Mind you, I loved visiting Sicily...fascinating island with some terrific beauty and a great history, but I feel sorry for the people there...
As I've said previously, their patrimony is theirs. Always will be and I don't think their military aircraft and weaponry have much, if anything, to do with the underlying principle that I see in this controversy. They also sell post cards with a closeup of David's genitalia to the tourists, as well as those aprons (which I think are kinda funny myself). OTOH, these are a people that did some pretty impressive things to save their art from being stolen by the German army or smashed to bits by Allied bombing raids in WW2. I think they have some ownership rights to complain about a gun manufacturer misappropriating the David.
However, I am happy to concede my art bias here. I confess and I do so happily...I hope to do a little blog here on DU on my thoughts from Piero's Trail in some medieval towns in eastern Tuscany...fascinating journey...just my thing...if my back doesn't give out...
MADem
(135,425 posts)My work took me between Rome and Napoli and points between! The "good food" and "good culture" section of things....the installation in Sicily (Signonella) is mostly Navy, though--the Air Force are concentrated up in Aviano, and of course, there's a collection of all branches at AFSOUTH in Naples. You might remember, in a dreadful interservice eff-up, it was a Marine flying out of Aviano who screwed things up real good a few years back when one of their hot-rodding flyboys was low-leveling in contravention of orders and basic common sense, and sliced through the cable of a cable car, killing 20 people and pissing off the Italians no end--they even wrote that into a Sopranos episode (when Tony and Pauly Walnuts went back to Napoli and were all over my old stomping grounds!). It didn't help that the guilty didn't get appropriate justice--I swear, Amanda Knox is pay-back for that.
I've visited Sicily a number of times--there are things to see and do down that way. Taormina, e.g., Mt. Aetna, Palermo and the swordfish is to die for...! But to me, Sicily is like a different country. Even the language is different. However, a fun "sea voyage" is to take the car ferry (they have rooms with beds if you don't want to stay up all night, and food, etc.) from Naples to Palermo, or the other way round--you meet a lot of interesting people and it's always neat to approach a city from the sea!
Bring a back brace, some Ben-Gay...and take LOTSA pictures....I will read your blog!!!!!!
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)I was eagerly expecting to see my favorite Caravaggio painting, The Burial of St. Lucy, in Siricusa but alas, it was being restored in Florence! Bummer! Mt. Aetna was fine until we encountered the snow as we ascended in a little minibus. The driver was frantic with the snow and kept calling us "pazzi!" all the way down. I was pondering whether I'd get down it in one piece...it was one of those "let's go up to the top of Mt. Aetna (what could possibly go wrong?)" times...
That car ferry sounds nice! I was tempted to take a ferry from Siricusa to Malta (more Caravaggio's) but no time...
JustAnotherGen
(31,924 posts)And I'm kind of chiming in on the discussion between you and CTYankee because 1. I know you have lived there and 2. She is brilliant in terms of Art History and 3. You both know/are familiar with my 'hooks into' Italy.
There's another piece here - It doesn't make the news and doesn't register with Americans - but Italy is in an austerity budget mode.
To put it simply - why shouldn't they make a buck off of this? They need the money. Is it a silly brouhaha? I don't know. But anyone who thinks that Italy is some bastion of socialism is an idiot. National Health Care does not a socialist country make - they are very very capitalistic and a LOT is 'for show'. From the way you smoke your ciggy to the way you walk down the street and the way you get your money.
Hey - if my nephews get up to date text books in their class rooms next years because the Italian government wins - the more power to Italy I say. It opens the door to bring in more revenue - and hey. It's DU - Tax the rich!
Off to read more between you and CT because this is how debates should be at DU - no stupidity - just discussion.
MADem
(135,425 posts)...and the Guardia di Finanza burst in with with machine guns (likely made by Beretta) in full uniform. They basically told us to eat up/pay up and checked our recivuta fiscales (fiscal receipts) on the way out the door. They had also chased down a few customers who had left the place before they burst in and rounded THEM up for not having a 'fiscale.' The way I understand tax law over there, every fiscale has to be numbered consecutively, and IF--as they often do--they give you a receipt that is just a list of what you ate with the total, they're cheating the tax man. You gotta have that number on it, identified as such. I know doggone well I ate in as many places that were off the books as on, as did many folks. One of my favorite places in the world was in someone's basement, with no sign out front-but mama mia, the place was always packed and the food was cheap and first rate.
On another occasion, I was a party to my neighbor avoiding the tax man. I lived in a villa that was a hobby farm, basically. My landlord "owned" the road and the gate at the bottom of it, down a long hill. The neighbors across the street had to rely on the good graces of the landlord (or me) to be able to use that road. The gate, which I never closed (I was a good neighbor and there was another gate/wall round my villa, which was surrounded by nosy grannies in their homes who kept an eye on things for which I was suitably grateful), was connected to my house with a buzzer. Well, my neighbors wanted to do a little "addition" onto their house (basically refinishing an existing space and adding a little balcony), and they didn't want to pay the tax man for it, so we started keeping the gate closed while the work was being done--the deal was, if you could get it done before they caught you at it, you were home free. One day, on the weekend, the Tax Man Cometh! He's ringing my bell to beat the band, and I'm replying good old Non Capisco Gibberish "Dave's not here, man!" once I realized who was on the other end. It gave them time to conceal the evidence of their work (there was another way in, on a lumpy, bumpy unpaved road) and to affect being "not at home" should they have gone around the back road. Hey, they were good neighbors--they fed me for YEARS! One good turn, and all that...
I found the Guardia rather intimidating--imagine if our IRS agents wore combat gear and machine guns, or dark uniforms that looked like they were designed by a 3rd Reich tailor, with knee high leather boots! Their "new" uniforms which they adopted about seven years ago are actually LESS intimidating than the old ones!
Picture these guys coming to audit you!!!
And the GICO (Organized Crime Group of the GdiF) are even scarier...!
I love a good chat, and never get mad at differences of opinion. I think CT is our resident art genius--I defer on all things visual, artistic, and meaningful in that regard!
The point that they are really broke and looking everywhere for money (even amongst the notorious tax cheats) is an important one though. I guess they were doing better a half dozen or so years ago, they didn't go after Taiwan for this beauty...
There are scads of examples when it comes to their cultural heritage where they've nodded indulgently; and I don't think the Culture Minister did any gatekeeping ahead of time, either.
Of course, there's also a third option--not anger over the "art" bit, not a need to extract a payment for the use, but a more amorphous reasoning--ANY publicity is good publicity! "Say, Martha, ya see the brou-ha-ha over the David statue in the pay-pah, hea-ah? Whadda-ya-say we take a vay-cay to It-lee this summah and have a look-see at the thing...?"
I have to wonder how many people now have the idea in their head that they need to go spend a little time viewing the cultural treasures of Bella Italia as a result of this imbroglio? I'm sure motivated to go back--but all I have to do is read an article about ANYTHING to do with Italy and I get that itch!
JustAnotherGen
(31,924 posts)Those guys kind of look like my husband in his Italian Marine dress uniform pics! They just look hot to me!
MADem
(135,425 posts)You're waiting for a handsome feller to come through the door...
I was sitting on my well-fed ass enjoying a bit of cappellini al limone with a nice jug of vino when those fellers came through the door yelling threats and preventing egress!
It's all about .... perspective!!! I think anyone would agree that yours is far better than mine!
Crepuscular
(1,057 posts)that Armalite was targeting the Italian marketplace with that ad. Further, I also doubt that the rifle advertised has ever been used to kill anyone in this country, either. Your link indicated that the Italians argued with an Italian version of Wikipedia, pictures of cultural heritage artifacts, including buildings and works of art like the statue in question are readily observed on Wikipedia.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,385 posts)Seeing as the ad appeared on Italian web sites. This is a sniper rifle. It's designed to kill. They want to profit from selling it. The Italians don't like their cultural heritage being used by arms dealers for profit.
MADem
(135,425 posts)They sell their products all over the world.
Products that are "designed to kill" too. They profit from that.
I think this is more about market share than anything else.
http://www.beretta.com/en-us/arx-100/
muriel_volestrangler
(101,385 posts)And taste is a factor in heritage.
ArmaLite see many people as literal gun-lovers, it's clear.
MADem
(135,425 posts)they don't really give a fig about safety measures.
And they can be incredibly tasteless in Italy. There used to be a popular tuna fish advertisement plastered all over the billboards that would have gotten DU in a complete uproar because it took "objectification of women" to a level I've rarely seen. I won't go into details but it was pretty well....tasteless!
I think this fit of pique is as much about market share as anything else. Gun sales make big Euros for bella Italia. And bella Italia is in the fiscal shits, lately:
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/eurocrisispress/2013/10/08/the-demise-of-italy-and-the-rise-of-chaos/
I'm not a gun lover, FWIW, I stay out of that cesspool gungeon, and don't even own a water pistol.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)but we have our own tasteless, too, in some game shows.
But in fine art (and I do mostly art intensives when I'm there) they have marvelous experts and lecturers. And they are VERY serious about their art...
MADem
(135,425 posts)I guess, though, that they didn't feel much competition from this firm, also selling the stuff, because they didn't complain about art/mockery in this context!
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I imagine there are a few, select, sub-literate idiots who conflate 'concern' and 'outrage'; as their own melodramatic labeling of what others think may be the only argument they have...
I also imagine they will quickly draw a distinction without a different when pointed out to them so as to better maintain holding others to a higher standard they they hold themselves to.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,385 posts)buildings in Italy are seldom (legally) illustrated on
Wikipedia: their pictures are either copyright
protected or subject to the Code of cultural heritage
(or both!)
The legal department of the Uffizi museum in
Florence sent a warning to the Italian Wikimedia
chapter...
http://communia-project.eu/communiafiles/cultural_heritage_and_the_public_domain-italian_review-fm.pdf
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)When I read some of the responses here, I realize again that it is no wonder western Europeans think Americans are crude and culturally a bit ignorant. I think it is difficult for them to understand how the Italians, in particular, feel about their artistic patrimony.
I can only sigh and shake my head...
NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)This particular case has some people choosing the Italian point of view because it's was a gun ad. While a small minority doesn't believe in Constitutional rights, most recognize that an Italian law doesn't apply here in the USA with our freedom of speech. Companies have made ads using the statue several times.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)art in the name of makin' a buck for jeans and tires companies surely wouldn't be mine...
petronius
(26,606 posts)billh58
(6,635 posts)the insensitivity of the gun culture, and a blatant attempt to feign "culture" where absolutely none exists.
NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)Are they insensitive also?
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Token Republican
(242 posts)Seems to me the claims of the USA being low class compared to Europe might be misplaced.
2001 Dutch Commercial. (Funny as hell but vulgar language alert)
I never knew that Italy has or claimed to have a copyright over the statue, and the article is sparse on details.
The complaint in the article seems more focused on the distortion of the statue rather than the use of the statue itself. I'd focus on that angle to see if the claim is valid.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)centered on their country's laws. Gee, they write funny laws/rules over there don't they?
NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)One of the dumbest is that the police are the lead in every plane crash and their version of the transportation safety board has to request permission to investigate the crash scene. Flat out backwards from the rest of the world. The police in more than one case just cleaned up the debris and set the investigations into the crashes behind for months.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)Maybe we here in the U.S. do them better. Apparently, the Italians have done art better...
gulliver
(13,197 posts)...holds a copyright on works in its historic sites.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)LongTomH
(8,636 posts).......what does any civilian need with a 50-caliber sniper's rifle? Planning assassinations? Preparing for Der Tag?
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)LuvNewcastle
(16,858 posts)They have a fig leaf covering the genitals on the statue, but that godawful rifle is displayed proudly. It's interesting to see what some people are offended by.
Bazinga
(331 posts)and we all know that the VPC is a gun-hugging right wing shill in the pocket of the ultimate evil the NRA ( ).
Here's what they came up with, VPC sniper crime.
There are 46 cases there, the oldest of which was 1992. Most of them were nothing more than the person had a .50 cal confiscated from their "arsenal" when they were arrested. Often on drug charges, some on gun trafficking, and some felons in possession.
I counted 5 times where the rifle was actually fired, and 9 people were killed. 4 of those were ATF officers killed at the shootout in Waco, TX. 3 more were a rampage shooting in Denver that involved two handguns. Neither of these cases mentioned that anyone was actually killed by the .50 cal.
Compare that to about 6,000 or so murdered each year by handguns.
I'm not saying anyone needs a .50 cal. I have absolutely no interest in ever owning one. But it does seem to beg the question, why do we need to concern ourselves with them?
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)It's almost the same size as he is!!!
rofflesome!
MADem
(135,425 posts)Looking at the pic again, maybe it's the poorly rendered fig leaf that got their ire...?