Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Archae

(46,340 posts)
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 11:55 PM Mar 2014

Does the Rio "Carnivale" objectify women?

I just read an article at ABC news about Rio's "Carnivale," lots of women in the pictures were wearing the teeniest outfits, showing off their bodies.

Men were wearing scanty outfits too.

Is this festival in Brazil an opportunity to just objectify women?

86 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does the Rio "Carnivale" objectify women? (Original Post) Archae Mar 2014 OP
Carnival is a festival and a reason to party. Autumn Mar 2014 #1
You could say that about the US' "Spring Break" too... Archae Mar 2014 #3
Yeah but Carnival goes a bit more. Autumn Mar 2014 #5
Yes. ForgoTheConsequence Mar 2014 #2
Have you seen Brazilian bikinis? JaneyVee Mar 2014 #4
Yep. The conservative version is COLGATE4 Mar 2014 #15
Several thousand, for sure Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #60
it is a bacchanal Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 #6
oh my good god dlwickham Mar 2014 #7
You're objectifying the wall in your smiley. Orrex Mar 2014 #11
LOL liberal N proud Mar 2014 #29
maybe if I was licking it dlwickham Mar 2014 #45
In Soviet Russia snooper2 Mar 2014 #79
well played dlwickham Mar 2014 #85
Carnival is one of the last vestiges of Saturnalia and Bacchanalia. Xithras Mar 2014 #8
No......It's the Media coverage of Carnivale that objectifies women thelordofhell Mar 2014 #9
men and women should never look at each other except for 2 minutes when making babies nt msongs Mar 2014 #10
Sinner. Chan790 Mar 2014 #39
That's actually not how it happened... snooper2 Mar 2014 #80
"Erotoxins".... Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #66
Does it "just" objectify women? No. Does it objectify women? Most likely yes. Gravitycollapse Mar 2014 #12
Ask Senhor Testiculo Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #13
Isn't that the username of your sackpuppet? pinboy3niner Mar 2014 #23
You know, if I wanted to play that game, I've got a list like a mile long. Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #50
Senhor Testiculo BainsBane Mar 2014 #44
Indeed. Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #55
I love that dude! zappaman Mar 2014 #57
It would make one hell of a Halloween costume. Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #61
Um... how do I say this? NNNNNNNOPE. cherokeeprogressive Mar 2014 #14
Based on what I can tell the definition of objectification seems to be Kurska Mar 2014 #16
Where is the "negative" rec button? NBachers Mar 2014 #17
If you find it, please let me know. theHandpuppet Mar 2014 #20
we had one for a while. It was great. It was so great they took it away. Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 #26
Sorta like meta. Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #68
Meta constrained meta to the meta forum. Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 #69
I think admin's purpose in creating meta was to contain it, and it worked, almost too well Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #71
So even if hosts were still ruthless Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 #72
Interesting to see a civil discussion between two Warren factions. Orrex Mar 2014 #73
You should try it with "Rex", some time. Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #77
Exactly-so what. I suspect admin came to the conclusion that no matter WHAT they do, it wont go away Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #84
Thought police arriving AgingAmerican Mar 2014 #18
I am disturbed by some of the attitudes about male sexuality on DU My Good Babushka Mar 2014 #19
Post removed Post removed Mar 2014 #28
Oh, I kinda like the block paragraph style. Eleanors38 Mar 2014 #38
have your discussion with men continually telling us they are grabbing kleenix and lotion, seabeyond Mar 2014 #34
I said I would hit it. joeglow3 Mar 2014 #74
And these posts about the "kleenix and lotion"? Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #86
lol Sheldon Cooper Mar 2014 #36
The woman is not the consumable image she produced My Good Babushka Mar 2014 #40
now you have simply gone ridiculous. lol. lordy. try harder. nt seabeyond Mar 2014 #41
How odd your response to a question about canaval in Rio BainsBane Mar 2014 #46
"Hey, wait a minute...." Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #59
Back in the day I played Mass in more than a few malaise Mar 2014 #21
Trinis forever !!! pangaia Mar 2014 #30
Carnivale REVELS in everyones' body. Big difference between intent. KittyWampus Mar 2014 #22
Objectification does not mean "wearing a bathing suit" gollygee Mar 2014 #24
yes but we can't post girly pictures in gd and gawk over them Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 #25
It's amazing how whiny they get, isn't it? Sheldon Cooper Mar 2014 #37
Thank you sibelian Mar 2014 #35
Very well said! BainsBane Mar 2014 #49
That explains the eagerness to see objectification behind everything Orrex Mar 2014 #58
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #27
Lighten up already. It's a party. badtoworse Mar 2014 #31
"lighten up"? "LIGHTEN UP?" Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #52
Excellent, but you forgot Sgt. Hulka! badtoworse Mar 2014 #70
If you think so you're missing the point. n/t Feral Child Mar 2014 #32
Everyone knows that showing skin is pure evil. tridim Mar 2014 #33
Then why did Carmen Miranda wear those hats, hmmmm? Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #67
The level of sexual assault and violence escalates during Carnival cally Mar 2014 #42
It is not an opportunity to "just objectify women." BainsBane Mar 2014 #43
that is very interesting Shivering Jemmy Mar 2014 #62
I developed it a bit more here BainsBane Mar 2014 #63
No. HappyMe Mar 2014 #47
Mardi Gras is pretty wild, too Aerows Mar 2014 #48
Who cares? Vashta Nerada Mar 2014 #51
You cared enough to read the thread and respond. BainsBane Mar 2014 #54
No (nt) bigwillq Mar 2014 #53
Link? Pics? underpants Mar 2014 #56
Maybe we could track down the person who forced them to wear those suits? Thor_MN Mar 2014 #64
does Bobby Cannavale do what? Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #65
You know what Gyp Rosetti does! Tsiyu Mar 2014 #76
I pretty much stopped watching that show after that season. Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #82
No more than Mardi Gras does KamaAina Mar 2014 #75
Show the bottom of their foot? snooper2 Mar 2014 #78
I actually used to wonder what would happen KamaAina Mar 2014 #81
Individuals objectify Dorian Gray Mar 2014 #83

Autumn

(45,120 posts)
1. Carnival is a festival and a reason to party.
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 12:02 AM
Mar 2014

Are the women and men objectifying themselves?

The carnival's excesses are considered an "act of farewell to the pleasures of the flesh," before Lent, during which Christians are supposed to abstain from bodily pleasures.

Autumn

(45,120 posts)
5. Yeah but Carnival goes a bit more.
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 12:12 AM
Mar 2014

of course my "Spring Break" was a lifetime ago and a Sunday school picnic compared to Rio.

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,869 posts)
2. Yes.
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 12:03 AM
Mar 2014

And for their own protection they should be forced to cover up, from head to toe. Sex is shameful and so is the human body. If you lust after or find someone attractive you are objectifying them. Sex is dirty and should be shamed at all times, no exceptions.






 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
6. it is a bacchanal
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 12:17 AM
Mar 2014

it objectifies sexuality in general. Actually much of it could be considered a parody of sexual objectification. More importantly mardi gras is an organic anarchic community self organized celebration.

If you are honestly interested in feminist perspectives on carnival, here: http://brayhammardigrasthesisproposal.weebly.com/

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
8. Carnival is one of the last vestiges of Saturnalia and Bacchanalia.
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 12:33 AM
Mar 2014

It's a seriously ancient tradition whose purpose is to shrug off social norms. It's a celebration of sex, fun, and just about everything else that is culturally "taboo" for upright and normal people.

Brazilians generally have more open attitudes about sex and sexuality in the first place. When you pile a bacchanal mindset on top of that, things can get pretty wild.

I suspect that a Brazilians response to your question would be something along the lines of: "If you're worried about objectification, you're not getting the point of Carnivale."

thelordofhell

(4,569 posts)
9. No......It's the Media coverage of Carnivale that objectifies women
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 12:35 AM
Mar 2014

Carnivale is incredible.......but all the media wants to show are the women

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
50. You know, if I wanted to play that game, I've got a list like a mile long.
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 05:06 PM
Mar 2014

Really, it's a shame I'm so damn honest.

BainsBane

(53,041 posts)
44. Senhor Testiculo
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 02:33 PM
Mar 2014

causing problems again. I'm glad to see he's been restored to full health after his run in with the beagle.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
16. Based on what I can tell the definition of objectification seems to be
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 02:11 AM
Mar 2014

"Sexuality that I personally do not like".

So no, because I like it.

Personally I see little shameful about the human body and even less so about the wondrous and so utterly human sexual drive.

Some appear to disagree.


Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
71. I think admin's purpose in creating meta was to contain it, and it worked, almost too well
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 12:14 PM
Mar 2014

and I think they thought they could get rid of it, and the problems it undeniably caused, by getting rid of the forum.

I think they could have, if they had followed through and stayed on the GD hosts with the whole 'be ruthless with meta' instruction- instead, they allowed the door open a crack and now of course, it's back with a vengeance. Perhaps this is an acknowledgement that, as you say, 'people are going to discuss DU'.

But it's the admin's site. If they don't want people discussing DU to the point of flat-out "get some new hobbies" absurdity, endlessly poring over and obsessing on the little details, making their weird little lists of people on this team and that, treating this goofy comment or that ill-timed joke or the other mis-perceived slight from 14 months ago as if it's a high-stakes game of stratego or some other ridiculous shit, they could put a stop to it.

It's their site.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
72. So even if hosts were still ruthless
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 01:10 PM
Mar 2014

Anyone can hijack a completely within the sop op and start their own "meta" discussion. And so what?

If we all thought that was unacceptable juries would think so too. But we don't.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
84. Exactly-so what. I suspect admin came to the conclusion that no matter WHAT they do, it wont go away
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 05:27 PM
Mar 2014

I suspect they've come to a similar conclusion regarding a number of things, pertaining to DU.

For me, personally, it's one of the reasons I don't take certain aspects of this place all that seriously, anymore. The breathless more-serious-than-serious tones about the staggeringly awesome import of some completely utterly ridiculous thing. The DU-rama. The portions of this place that have become increasingly disassociated from rational perspective as it pertains to the actual universe, outside this website.

It tells me that some folks have spent waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too long in their echo chambers.

My Good Babushka

(2,710 posts)
19. I am disturbed by some of the attitudes about male sexuality on DU
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 08:46 AM
Mar 2014

In objective reality in Rio and on the SI issue is that there are images of women, most people saw women, but some people could look at them and see only one thing, men furiously wanking off. Not leisurely exploring their sexuality, not having a nice, happy time, but only angrily whacking off with ugliness and hatred towards women in their souls. I think that was really too much. You cannot assume you know what other people are thinking or feeling. Women have parties where they can sell marital aids to each other, and it's celebrated when they talk about masturbation in terms of "celebrating themselves" and "exploring". That is objectifying masculinity down to the part that is hard and sticks out. They don't even have faces. I think men's sexuality was treated with unfairness and ugliness. Some men or women may have been aroused by the pictures, but you don't know that, and you can't assume that. That's like if women went to grocery store and the store refused to sell her cucumbers because "well, we know what you're going to do with that!"
They perpetrated a gross and unfair caricature of men and their sexuality. I think I actually heard Yakkity Sax in my head during the debate. They paint a tired old picture of men uncontrollably chasing women, and worse, painted themselves as the bitter old women in compression hose, beating others on the head for impure thoughts.

Response to My Good Babushka (Reply #19)

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
34. have your discussion with men continually telling us they are grabbing kleenix and lotion,
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 09:35 AM
Mar 2014

or the grown men saying they would hit IT, do IT, bang IT

now, tell me what this objectification is again?

talking about a vibrator has NOTHING to do with a man. um, that would be the point. hence, no, not objectifying men. that is about lame

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
74. I said I would hit it.
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 01:22 PM
Mar 2014

Just as I heard my wife and couple of her friends saying the same about some shirtless guy in one of the Twilight movies. And my wife and I ended up hitting each that night....twice.

To each their own.

My Good Babushka

(2,710 posts)
40. The woman is not the consumable image she produced
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 10:23 AM
Mar 2014

she is not confused that she, her discrete living breathing person, is the product she produced. The man (or woman) in the marital aid factory is not confused that he (or she) is the consumable image he (or she) produced.

BainsBane

(53,041 posts)
46. How odd your response to a question about canaval in Rio
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 02:35 PM
Mar 2014

Is to worry about male sexuality on DU. At best it's a non-sequitur.

malaise

(269,144 posts)
21. Back in the day I played Mass in more than a few
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 08:51 AM
Mar 2014

Trinidad carnivals. We had a blast and never thought we were 'objectifying' ourselves.
Still we had on more clothes than our men.
Ah well!!!

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
22. Carnivale REVELS in everyones' body. Big difference between intent.
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 08:51 AM
Mar 2014

In one case there is celebration of all, in the case of porn (however, soft) it's dehumanization of separate group.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
24. Objectification does not mean "wearing a bathing suit"
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 09:00 AM
Mar 2014

or "is attractive" or "is not wearing much (or any) clothing."

Here's something I posted to one of the other threads where people were still not understanding objectification. That thread was about bathing suits, but you could replace that with "goes to Carnivale" or whatever.

If you're choosing a bathing suit and heading out to the beach, you're a subject.

If you are hired by someone else to wear a bathing suit chosen by someone else to be photographed by someone else in a setting chosen by someone else and posed by someone else to be looked at by someone else, you might be being objectified.

Here's a definition:

Objectification is a notion central to feminist theory. It can be roughly defined as the seeing and/or treating a person, usually a woman, as an object. In this entry, the focus is primarily on sexual objectification, objectification occurring in the sexual realm. Martha Nussbaum (1995, 257) has identified seven features that are involved in the idea of treating a person as an object:

instrumentality: the treatment of a person as a tool for the objectifier's purposes;
denial of autonomy: the treatment of a person as lacking in autonomy and self-determination;
inertness: the treatment of a person as lacking in agency, and perhaps also in activity;
fungibility: the treatment of a person as interchangeable with other objects;
violability: the treatment of a person as lacking in boundary-integrity;
ownership: the treatment of a person as something that is owned by another (can be bought or sold);
denial of subjectivity: the treatment of a person as something whose experiences and feelings (if any) need not be taken into account.
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
25. yes but we can't post girly pictures in gd and gawk over them
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 09:08 AM
Mar 2014

so some of us are having a prolonged upset. We could post them in the boys club, and gawk there, but that doesn't seem to have the desired results.

Orrex

(63,219 posts)
58. That explains the eagerness to see objectification behind everything
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 08:59 PM
Mar 2014
Objectification is a notion central to feminist theory.
If so, then this is a case of eggs-in-one-basket.

In other words, if one doesn't accept Nussbaum's particular definition of objectification, and if one disagrees that a given act qualifies as objectification, then it basically knocks down the main tent pole.

And if Nussbaum's seven deadly sins of objectification don't apply in a given case, then on what basis are we to vilify a man's particular behavior as objectifying?

Response to Archae (Original post)

cally

(21,594 posts)
42. The level of sexual assault and violence escalates during Carnival
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 10:46 AM
Mar 2014

Women do not go alone, are often afraid, during Carnival. I spoke to journalists preparing a story on this issue. Of course, western media will not cover the story because it's so much more in keeping with current media practice to show the costumes and show and not what others experience.

BainsBane

(53,041 posts)
43. It is not an opportunity to "just objectify women."
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 02:31 PM
Mar 2014

It is a period in which people relinquish the restraints of daily life to dance, party, and sometimes do what they might not other times of the year. Some have described it, along with soccer, as a sort of opiate for the masses. You should know that the images you see of Carnval in Rio are all from the Sambadromo, a stadium that one must pay to enter. It is a competition by the various samba schools for who does the best presentation. It's a complex social phenomenon that has been written about in a number of books and articles. The queen of carnval is usually a woman of mixed race, what Brazilians call a mulata. The celebration of the mulata during Carnaval belies the ongoing racism (denied by most Brazilians) that elevates whiteness the rest of the year, as evident in telenovelas and magazines where white women represent beauty.

However, carnval de rua (of the street) is different. That is how most cariocas (residents of Rio) experience carnival. People don't wear the expensive costumes and simply go out on the street to dance, drink, and have a good time.

I have never spent carnival in Rio, but I have in Salvador. There carnval is entirely street. Bands move through the main avenues and people listen and dance free to charge. One can pay some money (nothing like the cost of Rio carnval) to dance within a carnival bloco (like Olodum, Ile Aye, Ara Ketu, Banda Eva, etc.) but you can enjoy carnival every bit as much if not more without paying.


The other thing to understand is that Brazil is far more sexually open that the US, and women are more empowered in many ways. Certainly objectification exists, but it's different.

Videos from carnval in Salvador.



This is a link to a YouTube channel with videos of this year's carnval, from this Sunday.

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjtuvQ17A2DO3Lh-wqIGh853XCSXTkZiQ

Olodum, probably the best know of the Bahian blocos, from carnival 2012.



An interesting thing to observe is that recent videos show are now women performing in Olodum, which was not the case when I was there in the 90s.


BainsBane

(53,041 posts)
63. I developed it a bit more here
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 01:13 AM
Mar 2014

and included a link to a live carnival feed from Salvador, if you're interested. Carnival technically ends tonight.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024603847

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
47. No.
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 02:39 PM
Mar 2014

From what I have heard it's a big, fabulous, fun party.

They are far less closed as far as bodies and sexuality go. It's a completely different culture.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
48. Mardi Gras is pretty wild, too
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 02:52 PM
Mar 2014

I've been to MANY Mardi Gras parades. It's today by the way, and I'm staying out of the middle of it because I've been there and done that. It's a party. Trying to make it about objectification is ridiculous. When people drink ludicrous amounts of alcohol, they tend to get a little loose. It just happens. You go to Mardi Gras to have a good time. I'm not saying that sexual harassment is in anyway okay, it's just when you are going to a street party with tens of thousands of drunk people, you really can't expect for everyone to behave.

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
76. You know what Gyp Rosetti does!
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 01:24 PM
Mar 2014


Just because he's not wearing his collar and leash right now doesn't mean he won't wear it for Carnivale, so stop saying that!


Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
82. I pretty much stopped watching that show after that season.
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 04:26 PM
Mar 2014

But he totally earned that Emmy with that role.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
75. No more than Mardi Gras does
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 01:23 PM
Mar 2014

You do know what women are supposed to do to get a string of white beads in the French Quarter, right?

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
81. I actually used to wonder what would happen
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 04:25 PM
Mar 2014

if a bare-breasted woman walked through a crowd of foot fetishists on Mardi Gras. "Show your feet! Show your feet!"

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does the Rio "Carniv...