General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCyber-era productivity can't produce enough jobs and CEO's can not hide it any longer.
Technology is starting to drain even former tech safe jobs, which has shocked economic guru's. Just look at the EU and bubble bust in Japan, and recent worries of job loss in China.
It is time for the DEM party to step up and start the discussion about
lowering the SocSec age to 50. Let's get ahead of the curve.
Layoff floodgates:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024572381
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)CK_John
(10,005 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)What am I missing?
-Laelth
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)He's cheerleading for the TPP.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)It's performance art. Let the OP have his fun.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)To pay for expanded costs of dramatically lowering retirement age.
Better to find work that is more value-added and directed toward problems that need solving rather than taking so much valuable and skilled labor out of the market.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)rework their lives. There is no requirement to retire and more importantly you can do both, work and collect SS.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)when the factories were putting out products that farmers (who were a larger part of the population back then) couldn't afford. Eventually everything came grinding to a halt with the Great Depression. So we don't need more jobs, we need better means of distributing the fruits of higher productivity across the population.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)and had a plan to do this now for your so called "better means".
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)people to retire at age 50 - thereby spreading the benefits of productivity. For comparison - we no longer need the labor of children to manufacture goods or bring home money to support the family.