General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Yes, of course a business owner should have the right to refuse service to gay people"
http://themattwalshblog.com/2014/02/25/yes-of-course-a-business-owner-should-have-the-right-to-refuse-service-to-gay-people/This shouldnt be an issue, but it is, because some gays in some states have specifically and maliciously targeted religious florists, bakers, and photographers, so that they can put these innocent people in a compromising position, and then run to the media and the courts when GASP! Christians decide to follow the dictates of Christianity.
...
Make no mistake: this is tyranny. Tyranny is not injured emotions, hurt feelings, and minor inconveniences. Tyranny is the government compelling a man or woman to conform to a dogma or bow to an idol. Tyranny is when you are forced to abandon your beliefs and fall in line.
And tyranny is still tyranny, even when it comes wrapped in tolerance and human rights.
I really have no idea where to begin with such demented minds as this person has. The grasp of religious fundamentalism is so strong that its victims really have no idea how far from sane and logical thinking they've fallen.
For example, this knuckle-dragger whom I've quoted rails against George Takei's comparisons of that proposed AZ legislation to Jim Crow laws but then goes on calling this tyranny that he is now forced to do business with someone who runs against the alleged tenets of his faith. Tyranny?! Really?! Go set foot in North Korea, asshat. Go work in a sweat house in SE Asia. Try being a woman in Saudi Arabia.
And as for "Christians decide to follow the dictates of Christianity"
Um...nowhere in the Bible did Jesus say anything against homosexuals other than a vague reference that they would do best to not marry. And isn't Christianity the following of this Jesus? Not the following of cherry-picked passages from the Old Testament (Mosaic...aka Jewish)?
It just sickens me more and more how these fund-a-mentals are lashing out harder now as the world is starting to pass them by.
Some day we'll all be past this. Not in my lifetime or even that of my children. But....some day.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Gr.
quaker bill
(8,224 posts)or adopt other convictions. There is nothing about having the "legal right" to be a bigot that will make you more popular when you do it.
If being a bigot is a matter of religious conviction for you, then stand proud in your convictions in spite of the criticism coming your way, do not go to government in hope of a shield. Even if they give you one, the criticism will not stop.
If you can't stand proud in your religious convictions, reinspect them and perhaps find a new set of values you can stand on.
demwing
(16,916 posts)Destroying bigotry is tyranny only to tyrants.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)If that kid were hit by a bus and got to meet Christ shortly thereafter, I do imagine the conversation would be a sorrowful one, as the homo-negating young man would have to try to reconcile his shirt with the admonition to love others as one loves one's self. I would imagine at the end of that conversation, the young man would be looking to see if Christ were holding a lever, and if there were a trap door under the young man's feet.
In the comment thread of the last entry, one of the posters wondered why many fundamentalists spend so much time in Leviticus and so little time in the New Testament, and I think that's a remarkably cogent question. Indeed, it is so cogent that I would like to make the suggestion that there is an entire class of self-identified "Christians" who are not Christian at all, in the sense that they don't follow the actual teachings of Christ in any meaningful way. Rather these people nod toward Christ in a cursory fashion on their way to spend time in the bloodier books of the Bible (which tend to be found in the Old Testament), using the text selectively as a support for their own hates and prejudices, using the Bible as a cudgel rather than a door. That being the case, I suggest we stop calling these people Christians and start calling them something that befits their faith, inclinations and enthusiasms.
I say we call them Leviticans, after Leviticus, the third book of the Old Testament, famous for its rules, and also the home of the passages most likely to be thrown out by Leviticans to justify their intolerance (including, in recent days, against gays and lesbians -- Leviticus Chapter 18, Verse 22: "Thou shalt not not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is abomination" .
Paladin
(28,267 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)kevinbgoode1
(153 posts)and as for them being "targeted" for their "deeply-held" "religious" beliefs, I have some doubts - after all, how many of these alleged, "sincerely-held" bible believers advertise their businesses as "Christian?" My guess is these people readily advertise that they do floral arrangements and cakes for weddings, the dash behind some "religious" belief when they discover their services are being solicited by a. . .shudder. . .gay customer.
Puhleaze - the customer is asking for flowers - not the florist's blessing. And it's a damned cake - a CAKE. If you are a business advertising these wedding services without any disclaimer or claim in your ads to subscribing to some cultish "religious" belief in which your "bible" threatens to send you on the fastest waterslide to hell if you bake someone else's fu*king CAKE, then all I see in these people is pitiful whining.
It's surely obvious that other prohibitions in their "god-is-gonna-hate-me-if-I-arrange-these-flowers-for-a-gay-person" could include a belief in "covenant" marriage, which excludes most straight Americans, and a whole list of other apparent sins - but you can also bet that somehow this same allegedly "Christian" with "deeply-held" beliefs never bothers to question an adulterer or divorcee about their adherence to such "Christian principles" when they are asked to bake them a cake or arrange flowers. Why, suddenly, their "sincerely-held" "religious" beliefs aren't important.
I'd sure love to attend one of these bogus churches which, apparently, has instilled such fear that baking a cake for a gay couple is an automatic E-Ticket to Hades, while doing the same thing for other sinners is. . .well. . .merely an oopsie that God will easily overlook when they show up to cash in on that bribe of everlasting life.