Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
1. And almost all of these involve women's reproductive rights.
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 12:35 PM
Feb 2014

The "certain group" that is discriminated against involves 50% of the adult population.

RKP5637

(67,111 posts)
4. I guess I'm just naive, but I don't see why so many women in America choose to be
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 12:41 PM
Feb 2014

abused by these states by the way they vote. Are they that subservient?

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
6. Men vote, too
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 12:45 PM
Feb 2014

Look, let's be clear: it is NOT up to women alone to fight these laws. All of us should (and hopefully do) work against institutional forms of racism and homophobia, not just racial minorities and gay people. We'd never succeed in fighting such laws if we left it up to these groups alone.

Similarly, it's up to everybody--not just women in their reproductive years--to oppose laws that discriminate against women.

RKP5637

(67,111 posts)
7. Yep! One difficulty I see is often these are treated as separate issues, but they are
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 12:50 PM
Feb 2014

not. It's all about repression of many groups. And often I think there is a lot of commonality in the suppressors across many groups, that often it's the same people. If one loves to suppress people in one area, I bet they like to do the same in other areas too. We should ALL be fighting those working hard to suppress people!


RKP5637

(67,111 posts)
3. Many of these issues need to be addressed by SCOTUS, which often seems to have
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 12:38 PM
Feb 2014

gave difficulties with fairness and equality for all.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
5. It was signed into law by Clinton and
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 12:44 PM
Feb 2014

passed Congress with only 3 dissenting votes.

And:

"The Religious Freedom Restoration Act applies to all religions, but is most pertinent to Native American religions that are burdened by increasing expansion of government projects onto sacred land. In Native American religion the land they worship on is very important. Often the particular ceremonies can only take place in certain locations because these locations have special significance.[5] This, along with peyote use are the main parts of Native American religions that are often left unprotected."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act


 

rug

(82,333 posts)
8. Every state guarantees religious freedom under the Constitution.
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 12:52 PM
Feb 2014

That's as it should be.

Don't let the assholes reframe the argument.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
10. The Native Americans would disagree with that
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 01:00 PM
Feb 2014

How much of their land have they lost to Fedco over the years? Wasn't a critical component of their religious ceremonies banned...peyote?

The RFRA has righted that.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
12. It would be helpful if you explained the difference between the RFRA and Arizona
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 01:02 PM
Feb 2014

type 'religious freedom to discriminate laws'.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
9. Information from Chuck Colson's ARFP should be taken for what it is.
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 12:53 PM
Feb 2014

That map and statement should be grain of salt time unless one is a Chuck Colson Christian.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This scares me - all the ...