Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 09:37 AM Feb 2014

SCOTUS heard oral arguments yesterday about whether the EPA can regulate greenhouse

gases.



Under the US system of government, federal agencies are afforded a wide discretion to shape policies that will give force to statutes passed by Congress.

<snip>

On Monday, the US Supreme Court took up a case examining whether the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) exceeded its regulatory power when it sought to expand the use of the Clean Air Act to regulate the release of greenhouse gases that scientists say are causing global warming.

During 90 minutes of oral argument, the justices appeared to be deeply divided over the issue, with conservative justices skeptical of the agency action and the court’s liberal wing embracing a more flexible posture.

It appears that Justice Anthony Kennedy may hold the decisive vote in the case. He gave few hints in questions and comments during the argument of how he is likely to vote.

At one point Justice Kennedy told US Solicitor General Donald Verrilli, who is defending the EPA’s approach, that he couldn’t find in the briefs “a single precedent that strongly supports your position.”

<snip>

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2014/0224/Did-EPA-overstep-in-tackling-global-warming-Supreme-Court-sharply-split.-video

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS heard oral arguments yesterday about whether the EPA can regulate greenhouse (Original Post) cali Feb 2014 OP
any idea why this even made it to the court ? how does it over step when regulation is what it does? leftyohiolib Feb 2014 #1
yes. texas, unsurprisingly cali Feb 2014 #2
thanks cali eom leftyohiolib Feb 2014 #3
kick. need to encourage those posters who mostly lurk to be more vocal Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #4
ah, your ususal insightful hot air. cali Feb 2014 #5
 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
1. any idea why this even made it to the court ? how does it over step when regulation is what it does?
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 10:03 AM
Feb 2014
 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
4. kick. need to encourage those posters who mostly lurk to be more vocal
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 01:24 PM
Feb 2014

on the issues. And if there is one issue that needs attention, it is the amount of CO2 or hot air in our atmosphere. Caused by humans.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
5. ah, your ususal insightful hot air.
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 01:28 PM
Feb 2014

Yep, I post a lot. I mostly post articles about issues. Kpete does that too. have you snarked in any of her threads yet?

I trust you're so pleased with yourself, and think your attempt at snark is soooo clever, that you'll be posting the like in all my ops.

go for it, pretz.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUS heard oral argumen...