General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSCOTUS heard oral arguments yesterday about whether the EPA can regulate greenhouse
gases.
Under the US system of government, federal agencies are afforded a wide discretion to shape policies that will give force to statutes passed by Congress.
<snip>
On Monday, the US Supreme Court took up a case examining whether the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) exceeded its regulatory power when it sought to expand the use of the Clean Air Act to regulate the release of greenhouse gases that scientists say are causing global warming.
During 90 minutes of oral argument, the justices appeared to be deeply divided over the issue, with conservative justices skeptical of the agency action and the courts liberal wing embracing a more flexible posture.
It appears that Justice Anthony Kennedy may hold the decisive vote in the case. He gave few hints in questions and comments during the argument of how he is likely to vote.
At one point Justice Kennedy told US Solicitor General Donald Verrilli, who is defending the EPAs approach, that he couldnt find in the briefs a single precedent that strongly supports your position.
<snip>
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2014/0224/Did-EPA-overstep-in-tackling-global-warming-Supreme-Court-sharply-split.-video
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)on the issues. And if there is one issue that needs attention, it is the amount of CO2 or hot air in our atmosphere. Caused by humans.
cali
(114,904 posts)Yep, I post a lot. I mostly post articles about issues. Kpete does that too. have you snarked in any of her threads yet?
I trust you're so pleased with yourself, and think your attempt at snark is soooo clever, that you'll be posting the like in all my ops.
go for it, pretz.