Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 08:16 PM Feb 2014

Holder Says State Attorneys General Don’t Have to Defend Gay Marriage Bans

Holder Says State Attorneys General Don’t Have to Defend Gay Marriage Bans

By MATT APUZZOFEB

Washington — Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said Monday that state attorneys general who believe that laws in their states banning same-sex marriage are discriminatory are not obligated to defend them.

<...>

Six state attorneys general – all Democrats – have refused to defend bans on same-sex marriage, prompting criticism from Republicans who say they have a duty to defend their state laws, not just the ones they agree with.

Mr. Holder said when laws touch on core constitutional issues like equal protection, an attorney general should apply the highest level of scrutiny before reaching a decision on whether to defend it. He said the decision should never be political or based on policy objections.

<...>

Mr. Holder’s own refusal to defend the federal Defense of Marriage Act in 2011 helped lead to last year’s Supreme Court decision striking down the law as unconstitutional.

- more -

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/25/us/holder-says-state-attorneys-general-dont-have-to-defend-gay-marriage-bans.html


7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Holder Says State Attorneys General Don’t Have to Defend Gay Marriage Bans (Original Post) ProSense Feb 2014 OP
If, they allow the bans to stand, then where would be the next target, repeals of RKP5637 Feb 2014 #1
state laws.. stillcool Feb 2014 #2
The SCOTUS already declared such discrimination unconstitutional. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #3
I think he's talking about the state attorney's, not DA's, and how that relates to the Fed. They RKP5637 Feb 2014 #4
Kick! n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #5
Here in PA.......... MyOwnPeace Feb 2014 #6
Excellent. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #7

RKP5637

(67,108 posts)
1. If, they allow the bans to stand, then where would be the next target, repeals of
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 08:24 PM
Feb 2014

the civil rights laws of the 60's. I'm sure a number of states would love to bring back segregation. We boast about equality in the US, then allow laws to dictate for whom that equality is to exist. Freedom, civil rights and equality are a non-ending battle in the US which boasts of equal rights to the rest of the world.


stillcool

(32,626 posts)
2. state laws..
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 08:37 PM
Feb 2014

How can a district attorney not recognize a state law, even if it is discriminatory? I don't get it.

RKP5637

(67,108 posts)
4. I think he's talking about the state attorney's, not DA's, and how that relates to the Fed. They
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 09:02 PM
Feb 2014

apparently can ignore enforcement, much as Holder has done.

Oops, I see ProSense just gave you the answer!

MyOwnPeace

(16,927 posts)
6. Here in PA..........
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 11:35 PM
Feb 2014

Gov. Tom Corporate, the Repukes, and Baggers went nuts when our AG Kathleen Kane refused to defend our own caveman laws on appeal.
Way to go, Atty. General Kane!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Holder Says State Attorne...