Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"with proper safeguards in place fracking operations pose no threat to local air quality"
so says the industry... http://www.energyfromshale.org/environment/air-quality-concerns
and here is the reality...
http://eagleford.publicintegrity.org
For the past eight months, the Center for Public Integrity, InsideClimate News and The Weather Channel have examined what Texas, the nations biggest oil producer, has done to protect people in the Eagle Ford from the industrys pollutants. What's happening in the Eagle Ford is important not only for Texas, but also for Pennsylvania, Colorado, North Dakota and other states where horizontal drilling and high-volume hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, have made it profitable to extract oil and gas from deeply buried shale.
Our investigation and records obtained from Texas regulatory agencies reveal a system that does more to protect the industry than the public. Among the findings:
Texas air monitoring system is so flawed that the state knows almost nothing about the extent of the pollution in the Eagle Ford. Only five permanent air monitors are installed in the 20,000-square-mile region, and all are at the fringes of the shale play, far from the heavy drilling areas where emissions are highest.
...
Thousands of oil and gas facilities, including six of the nine production sites near the Buehrings house, are allowed to self-audit their emissions without reporting them to the state. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), which regulates most air emissions, doesnt even know some of these facilities exist. An internal agency document acknowledges that the rule allowing this practice [c]annot be proven to be protective.
Companies that break the law are rarely fined. Of the 284 oil and gas industry-related complaints filed with the TCEQ by Eagle Ford residents between Jan. 1, 2010, and Nov. 19, 2013 , only two resulted in fines despite 164 documented violations. The largest was just $14,250. (Pending enforcement actions could lead to six more fines.)
etc
Leaving me to wonder why President Obama would possibly think that the industry talking point is appropriate to use in his SOTU speech... One of the reasons why is natural gas if extracted safely, its the bridge fuel that can power our economy with less of the carbon pollution that causes climate change.
if only, it could be done safely... doesn't strike me as leadership.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 554 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"with proper safeguards in place fracking operations pose no threat to local air quality" (Original Post)
Agony
Feb 2014
OP
KT2000
(20,587 posts)1. make them prove it
demand air monitors
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)2. Gee, ain't that great
What about WATER quality?