Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 02:40 PM Mar 2012

If George Zimmerman had been beaten and bloodied, as per initial police reports...

why are the police not eager to trot photographs out to the press? Why would they not want to quell the tide of rising anger over their inaction? Why? Because I think it didn't really happen. If there was blood on Mr. Zimmerman, it did not belong to him, or was made by defensive actions.

Armed with a bag of Skittles and an Iced tea, up against a much heavier man with a gun? It really is that simple.

56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If George Zimmerman had been beaten and bloodied, as per initial police reports... (Original Post) ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 OP
That's my take on things too! n/t arthritisR_US Mar 2012 #1
What I'm also curious about is Zimmerman's photograph we see on TV Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #2
I think that was an old mugshot from his 2005 arrest for assaulting a cop. madaboutharry Mar 2012 #4
Ah...thanks for that Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #6
It was an old mugshot of the suspect the police said had a squeaky clean record. n/t EFerrari Mar 2012 #8
Zimmerman hasn't been arrested for a crime in this incident. Life Long Dem Mar 2012 #17
I just saw on another forum EC Mar 2012 #3
I think he was down too. ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #23
He probably tripped and fell face chasing him. n/t Ganja Ninja Mar 2012 #5
That's a possiblity itsrobert Mar 2012 #15
Good hypothesis. n/t ellisonz Mar 2012 #27
If a poacher gets scratched before killing the prey, does that excuse the poacher from the crime? leveymg Mar 2012 #7
Agreed Xyzse Mar 2012 #9
By allowing the shooter to leave the scene, evidence was not preserved. AtomicKitten Mar 2012 #10
Why do you think they took photographs? hfojvt Mar 2012 #11
I believe his prior arrest for assaulting a cop throws that theory out the window - TBF Mar 2012 #12
WTF Skittles Mar 2012 #13
Why would a 'lover' murder a boy carrying a bag of skittles? Rex Mar 2012 #16
Because it was a love crime and not a hate crime silly, loved that kid to death he did. Dragonfli Mar 2012 #29
maybe because said boy was beating the crap out of him hfojvt Mar 2012 #52
WTF? ForgoTheConsequence Mar 2012 #19
:spittake: eShirl Mar 2012 #53
Zimmerman persude Martin...end of story uponit7771 Mar 2012 #20
Because he was a man who shot an unarmed child? ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #21
Any time someone is shot to death the police should collect evidence auburngrad82 Mar 2012 #22
Yes, there was need to collect evidence. Evidence is often collected BEFORE an arrest. pnwmom Mar 2012 #25
Lovers do not patrol around carrying a gun unless there is a crime wave. JDPriestly Mar 2012 #26
I sure am glad the New Jersey Jets got Tebow. Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #28
It's marginally better than getting ebola... sikorsky Mar 2012 #34
There is always need to collect evidence at a murder site. Even when a "lover" who pursues a teen uppityperson Mar 2012 #32
"One person can make a difference" RetroLounge Mar 2012 #42
Well I did have a bookstore in Wisconsin for seven years hfojvt Mar 2012 #55
because someone was just killed, i know insurance companies like to have photos of fender benders got root Mar 2012 #43
I don't know many lovers with charges for assault on a LEO and domestic violence. nt Incitatus Mar 2012 #44
he was not a lover of young black kids. Whisp Mar 2012 #49
Well that "lover" must have been a fighter considering his previous record Lilyeye Mar 2012 #54
I don't care if he was bloodied he still was the one who pursued the boy who had every WI_DEM Mar 2012 #14
agree librechik Mar 2012 #18
i agree, i don't think it happened either, people keep saying we need more facts JI7 Mar 2012 #24
I want more facts too... ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #30
You'd think they'd be in a hurry to prove that Trayvon inflicted ANY damage CakeGrrl Mar 2012 #31
So if you feel threatened by an unarmed man deadly force is legally justified? Kablooie Mar 2012 #33
No it is not legal to start a fight and blow someone away ... spin Mar 2012 #47
Interesting. And it seems to jive with this. savalez Mar 2012 #35
Link? RUMMYisFROSTED Mar 2012 #36
Well, it's all over DU...but, if you'd like it again... ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #40
Wrong spot. RUMMYisFROSTED Mar 2012 #41
Don't cry...It's okay. ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #50
If Zimmerman were beaten and bloody... Joseph8th Mar 2012 #37
I've also wondered what Zimmerman could POSSIBLY say in his own defense Nevernose Mar 2012 #38
*IF* he was bloody I think it was caused by Raine Mar 2012 #39
I seriously have to ask DID they take pictures? Justice wanted Mar 2012 #45
Did Zimmerman go to the hospitol? Eddie Haskell Mar 2012 #46
They took no photos nor did they send him to a hospital... cynatnite Mar 2012 #48
If they did send him to the hospital, the hospital can't say boo- HIPAA. X_Digger Mar 2012 #51
***Well I guess I have my answer why not. ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #56
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
2. What I'm also curious about is Zimmerman's photograph we see on TV
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 02:42 PM
Mar 2012

Was that a mughsot taken by the police that night? Because it he sure doesn't look beaten and bloodied.

EC

(12,287 posts)
3. I just saw on another forum
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 02:44 PM
Mar 2012

that 2 witnesses on CNN said that Zimmerman had him on the ground and was sitting on Trayvon's chest. I'm wondering how close the shot was? Did Z shoot him while he was lying on his back on the ground? Or did he shoot him while running or standing. I'm beginning to believe the kid was already down when shot.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
23. I think he was down too.
Reply to EC (Reply #3)
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 03:53 PM
Mar 2012

On edit: the fact that the reports state he had candy and an iced tea in his hand makes me suspicious that there was a physical confrontation at all.

itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
15. That's a possiblity
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 03:04 PM
Mar 2012

Zimmerman was apparently running across a road, he could have tripped on a curb and fell on his face. Or he could have have drawn his weapon, aimed it a Trayvon, Trayvon thinking Zimmerman is some sort of nut throws the can of ice tea at his face blooding his nose.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
7. If a poacher gets scratched before killing the prey, does that excuse the poacher from the crime?
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 02:49 PM
Mar 2012

I don't think so. Hunting and killing a human being without a legal warrant and not deputized = homicide. Next case.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
9. Agreed
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 02:53 PM
Mar 2012

The issue to me is that he was told to not pursue by a 911 dispatcher.
The fact that he did so means he was trolling for a fight.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
10. By allowing the shooter to leave the scene, evidence was not preserved.
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 02:54 PM
Mar 2012

Unless they can come up with a photograph of Zimmerman with the chain of evidence secure (a photo taken that night), the police are SOOL and now are just trying to cover their ass.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
11. Why do you think they took photographs?
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 02:59 PM
Mar 2012

Zimmerman was not arrested, and certainly no charges were gonna be filed on Trayvon, so there's no need to collect evidence for a trial.

Zimmerman is a large man, but he may be a lover and not a fighter. Trayvon, for his light weight, was 6' 3". A bean-pole to be sure. I used to be 6' and 128 pounds as a 17 year old, but I was not as weak as I looked either.

TBF

(32,084 posts)
12. I believe his prior arrest for assaulting a cop throws that theory out the window -
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 03:02 PM
Mar 2012

but keep trying.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
52. maybe because said boy was beating the crap out of him
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 02:48 AM
Mar 2012

"loverr not a fighter" is just a phrase. Meaning, just because Zimmerman is a large man, does not mean he knows how to handle himself in a fight.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
21. Because he was a man who shot an unarmed child?
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 03:33 PM
Mar 2012

Because they cared enough to file a report (they say) that made note of Zimmerman being bloodied? Typically when a report is filed photographs are taken to corroborate (or to refresh memories) the evidence that is reported.

That's right off the top of my head.

auburngrad82

(5,029 posts)
22. Any time someone is shot to death the police should collect evidence
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 03:46 PM
Mar 2012

They cannot simply look at the scene of the shooting, see that a black man was shot to death by a white man, and say, "Oh well, nothing to see here, move along"

I cannot buy any story that involves the police not collecting evidence.

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
25. Yes, there was need to collect evidence. Evidence is often collected BEFORE an arrest.
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 04:34 PM
Mar 2012

I think if there had been evidence supporting Zimmerman's claim -- i.e., his appearance -- then photos would have been taken.

Zimmerman had a record as a fighter, not a lover.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
26. Lovers do not patrol around carrying a gun unless there is a crime wave.
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 06:03 PM
Mar 2012

Normally, when there is a shooting, the police collect all kinds of evidence.

The police were not doing their job in this instance. I don't know, but I suspect that Zimmerman was friends with a couple of officers -- or at least knew them to some extent. The lack of an investigation immediately following the event is appalling..

How would we feel if a member of our family -- a 17-year-old were brutally shot and the police did not even care enough to investigate fully and immediately? I know that I would raise the roof. I can't imagine anyone who would not scream as loud as possible.

The lack of an investigation is what is so shocking about this case. It suggests to me that the police assumed Zimmerman's innocence from the very moment they learned of the killing.

That is not normal police procedure. No way.

Something stinks to high heaven. We don't know what the full story is, but thanks to the negligence or intentional disregard for Trayvon's rights and the rights of his family, we will never know.

Someone should be fired -- without delay, in my opinion.

uppityperson

(115,678 posts)
32. There is always need to collect evidence at a murder site. Even when a "lover" who pursues a teen
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 08:48 PM
Mar 2012

is involved.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
55. Well I did have a bookstore in Wisconsin for seven years
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 03:42 PM
Mar 2012

I like to think I sold some good books, at least I offered them for sale, and gave a bunch away when I went out of business and moved. Then, many years later, I tried to give advice and encouragement to some guy I met through a discussion board who was going into business.

Small random acts of kindness make some difference, even if only a small difference.

 

got root

(425 posts)
43. because someone was just killed, i know insurance companies like to have photos of fender benders
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 09:38 PM
Mar 2012

so you would think this case warranted a little investigation.

no?

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
14. I don't care if he was bloodied he still was the one who pursued the boy who had every
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 03:04 PM
Mar 2012

right to defend himself against somebody who was stalking and confronting him.

JI7

(89,260 posts)
24. i agree, i don't think it happened either, people keep saying we need more facts
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 04:13 PM
Mar 2012

more info to come out. but everything that is coming out is working against Zimmerman.

CakeGrrl

(10,611 posts)
31. You'd think they'd be in a hurry to prove that Trayvon inflicted ANY damage
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 08:28 PM
Mar 2012

Did the autopsy reveal any proof that he struck his murderer? I bet not.

Kablooie

(18,637 posts)
33. So if you feel threatened by an unarmed man deadly force is legally justified?
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 09:07 PM
Mar 2012

Even if you went out of your way to goad the guy into fighting with you.

I guess anytime someone starts a fist fight you can pull out your gun and blow him away legally.
Tell the cops you felt threatened and you get off scott free.
You don't even have to have BEEN threatened.
You just FELT threatened.

Sounds like gang war heaven.
Fight all you want and no one has to go to jail.

What the hell is going on down there?


spin

(17,493 posts)
47. No it is not legal to start a fight and blow someone away ...
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 10:46 PM
Mar 2012

despite all the bullshit that you read.

Unfortunately the law requires enforcement from the authorities. It appears that the police are hiding behind the "Stand Your Ground" law and using it as an excuse not to arrest Zimmerman.



ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
40. Well, it's all over DU...but, if you'd like it again...
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 10:23 PM
Mar 2012
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/os-trayvon-martin-shooting-zimmerman-letter-20120315,0,1716605.story

snip-

Zimmerman told police he acted in self-defense. Police found blood on his face and the back of his head as well as grass on the back of his shirt.

-snip
 

Joseph8th

(228 posts)
37. If Zimmerman were beaten and bloody...
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 09:23 PM
Mar 2012

... then I guess it turns out he wasn't beaten and bloody ENOUGH. We was still conscious enough to pull a trigger.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
38. I've also wondered what Zimmerman could POSSIBLY say in his own defense
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 09:30 PM
Mar 2012

Even if his version of events is accurate, he still has to begin any recounting with, "There I was, stalking a child in the rain..."

Raine

(30,540 posts)
39. *IF* he was bloody I think it was caused by
Wed Mar 21, 2012, 09:36 PM
Mar 2012

sitting on Martin when he shot him and the recoil from the gun caused him to hit himself in the nose and bloody it.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
48. They took no photos nor did they send him to a hospital...
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 10:49 PM
Mar 2012

I've worked in an ER and assault victims are usually asked to go to a hospital. There will at the very least be a report by a physician that can accompany the police report.

I suspect they are going to hold onto whatever additional evidence they have until the investigation is complete.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
51. If they did send him to the hospital, the hospital can't say boo- HIPAA.
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 01:29 AM
Mar 2012

From the police report Sanford Fire Rescue did treat him, but that's all we know. (And assuming the report is accurate, of course.)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If George Zimmerman had b...