Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 01:32 PM Feb 2014

Kill At Will: Stand Your Ground Laws Contribute To 600 Additional Homicides A Year

A new study in the Journal of Human Resources reveals that the controversial Stand Your Ground laws in states across the U.S. contribute to 600 additional homicides a year.

This news comes just as the nation learned that 26 children or teens have died in Florida alone under the “kill at will” self-defense law.

We asked what happened to homicide rates in states that passed these laws between 2000 and 2010, compared to other states over the same time period. We found that homicide rates in states with a version of the Stand Your Ground law increased by an average of 8 percent over states without it — which translates to roughly 600 additional homicides per year. These homicides are classified by police as criminal homicides, not as justifiable homicides.

It is fitting that much of this debate has centered on Florida, which enacted its law in October of 2005. Florida provides a case study for this more general pattern. Homicide rates in Florida increased by 8 percent from the period prior to passing the law (2000-04) to the period after the law (2006-10).By comparison, national homicide rates fell by 6 percent over the same time period. This is a crude example, but it illustrates the more general pattern that exists in the homicide data published by the FBI.

http://globalgrind.com/2014/02/14/stand-your-ground-laws-contribute-600-additional-homicides-a-year-details/
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kill At Will: Stand Your Ground Laws Contribute To 600 Additional Homicides A Year (Original Post) SecularMotion Feb 2014 OP
Freedumb pscot Feb 2014 #1
Shoot somebody or don't shoot somebody. They like their odds of getting off. onehandle Feb 2014 #2
I don't like my neighbor. DURHAM D Feb 2014 #3
Yes you can. But be prepared for the consequences of your actions. n/t oneshooter Feb 2014 #4
I was just standing my ground. DURHAM D Feb 2014 #5
Because SYG laws don't work that way. sked14 Feb 2014 #6
Would I need to live in Florida for it to work that way? DURHAM D Feb 2014 #7
Couldn't tell you, sked14 Feb 2014 #8
I don't see how. DURHAM D Feb 2014 #10
You would need to live in Florida and your neighbor could not be white etherealtruth Feb 2014 #9
But none of the neighbors like his music, his mustache or his guns. DURHAM D Feb 2014 #11
I am sorry it is not etherealtruth Feb 2014 #12
at least one juror on the Dunn case was hoping it worked out for him bettyellen Feb 2014 #17
You don't know that, sked14 Feb 2014 #19
They asked questions about ALSO applying self defense to the shots fired at those fleeing, bettyellen Feb 2014 #20
No, but you can tell him to turn his music down and defend yourself if attacked n/t Taitertots Feb 2014 #16
I have some questions about the study. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2014 #13
of course you do.... eom rbrnmw Feb 2014 #15
I am shocked. bettyellen Feb 2014 #22
Yeah, I'll bet you're going to get right on that..... llmart Feb 2014 #25
But that's why the Founders billh58 Feb 2014 #14
SYG ... napkinz Feb 2014 #18
"Kill At Will" toddwv Feb 2014 #21
This is now the third study I've seen come to the same or similar conclusions. DanTex Feb 2014 #23
K&R cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author Boom Sound 416 Feb 2014 #26

DURHAM D

(32,611 posts)
3. I don't like my neighbor.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 01:46 PM
Feb 2014

He usually has a gun strapped around his mid-section or in his brief case. Every day when he arrives home from work I hear him pull in the driveway because he plays his music very loud with the windows down. He is a 50 yo white man with a handlebar mustache.

I am a white female.

Can I just walk outside and shot him and claim I felt threatened?

 

sked14

(579 posts)
8. Couldn't tell you,
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 02:07 PM
Feb 2014

I live all the way across the country, but it's a distinct possibility.
But I would recommend not trying that, it would probably have a bad ending.

DURHAM D

(32,611 posts)
10. I don't see how.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 02:11 PM
Feb 2014

There are no cameras in my neighborhood to show that I was the aggressor.

His music is always too loud. He has red hair and everyone knows what that means. Seems a slam dunk.

Maybe for insurance I should peel the NRA sticker off of his SUV and put it on my Prius.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
9. You would need to live in Florida and your neighbor could not be white
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 02:10 PM
Feb 2014

... then you have a pretty good chance.

Obnoxious white guys with guns are NOT threatening.

Black guys engaged in any activity are very scary.

At least that is how it appears to work

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
12. I am sorry it is not
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 02:20 PM
Feb 2014

He is a white guy with a gun ... therefore he is NOT a threat .

Is there any chance you could claim you thought he was a scary black man ... or maybe a scary "mixed" race man?

Your post above mentioning peeling off his NRA sticker and putting it on your car is a good start ... it would at least identify you as a paranoid psycho ...?

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
17. at least one juror on the Dunn case was hoping it worked out for him
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 02:53 PM
Feb 2014

but at least you can't shoot fleeing people too....yet.

 

sked14

(579 posts)
19. You don't know that,
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 02:56 PM
Feb 2014

the more likely scenario is that one or two jurors were holding out for 1st murder and couldn't be convinced to vote for 2nd murder or manslaughter as the rest of the jurors wanted.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
20. They asked questions about ALSO applying self defense to the shots fired at those fleeing,
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 03:05 PM
Feb 2014

Someone wished to hear self defense could cover all of the shootings- so someone believed the self defense story that took Dunn days to concoct. Luckily, there was no self defense claimed for those additional seven shots fired. But someone on that jury had argued that shooting fleeing suspects was self defense, and the court corrected them. So they had to have assumed Dunn was in a position of "defending himself" in the initial shooting.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
13. I have some questions about the study.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 02:29 PM
Feb 2014

I'll have to look for the actual study (and more to the point, the actual data), as I have a few questions. In the main, I want to see if the bulk of the increase in homicide in SYG states occurred in cases where SYG was invoked and succeeded (that is, the homicide found to be justified), was invoked and failed (defendant was convicted), or wasn't invoked at all.

I'm also curious about the distribution between states that enacted SYG but formerly had "duty to retreat" laws and those that enacted SYG and in which the law was previously silent on that matter. My state, Oregon, has no explicit SYG law, but doesn't really need one: there's no "duty to retreat" here, as ruled by our Supreme Court.

llmart

(15,548 posts)
25. Yeah, I'll bet you're going to get right on that.....
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 03:55 PM
Feb 2014

research. Uh-huh. Yep.

You're a bit too transparent. Maybe your first resource will be Guns and Ammo magazine? I bet their "research" is really believable.

billh58

(6,635 posts)
14. But that's why the Founders
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 02:31 PM
Feb 2014

wrote the Second Amendment: so that Americans can kill each other and carry out vigilante justice. It's the American way, and we hold the record for gun deaths over all other "civilized" nations. Yay.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
23. This is now the third study I've seen come to the same or similar conclusions.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 03:18 PM
Feb 2014

At the same time, no statistical evidence has been found that SYG has any deterrent effect in terms of reduced rates of burglary or robbery. I wonder, is gun nuttery going to yield to science?

Don't answer that...

Response to SecularMotion (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kill At Will: Stand Your ...