General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKill At Will: Stand Your Ground Laws Contribute To 600 Additional Homicides A Year
This news comes just as the nation learned that 26 children or teens have died in Florida alone under the kill at will self-defense law.
We asked what happened to homicide rates in states that passed these laws between 2000 and 2010, compared to other states over the same time period. We found that homicide rates in states with a version of the Stand Your Ground law increased by an average of 8 percent over states without it which translates to roughly 600 additional homicides per year. These homicides are classified by police as criminal homicides, not as justifiable homicides.
It is fitting that much of this debate has centered on Florida, which enacted its law in October of 2005. Florida provides a case study for this more general pattern. Homicide rates in Florida increased by 8 percent from the period prior to passing the law (2000-04) to the period after the law (2006-10).By comparison, national homicide rates fell by 6 percent over the same time period. This is a crude example, but it illustrates the more general pattern that exists in the homicide data published by the FBI.
http://globalgrind.com/2014/02/14/stand-your-ground-laws-contribute-600-additional-homicides-a-year-details/
pscot
(21,024 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)So more shootings.
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)He usually has a gun strapped around his mid-section or in his brief case. Every day when he arrives home from work I hear him pull in the driveway because he plays his music very loud with the windows down. He is a 50 yo white man with a handlebar mustache.
I am a white female.
Can I just walk outside and shot him and claim I felt threatened?
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)Why would there be consequences?
sked14
(579 posts)Try it and see how well it works out for you.
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)sked14
(579 posts)I live all the way across the country, but it's a distinct possibility.
But I would recommend not trying that, it would probably have a bad ending.
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)There are no cameras in my neighborhood to show that I was the aggressor.
His music is always too loud. He has red hair and everyone knows what that means. Seems a slam dunk.
Maybe for insurance I should peel the NRA sticker off of his SUV and put it on my Prius.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)... then you have a pretty good chance.
Obnoxious white guys with guns are NOT threatening.
Black guys engaged in any activity are very scary.
At least that is how it appears to work
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)It should be a proper killing.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)He is a white guy with a gun ... therefore he is NOT a threat .
Is there any chance you could claim you thought he was a scary black man ... or maybe a scary "mixed" race man?
Your post above mentioning peeling off his NRA sticker and putting it on your car is a good start ... it would at least identify you as a paranoid psycho ...?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)but at least you can't shoot fleeing people too....yet.
sked14
(579 posts)the more likely scenario is that one or two jurors were holding out for 1st murder and couldn't be convinced to vote for 2nd murder or manslaughter as the rest of the jurors wanted.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Someone wished to hear self defense could cover all of the shootings- so someone believed the self defense story that took Dunn days to concoct. Luckily, there was no self defense claimed for those additional seven shots fired. But someone on that jury had argued that shooting fleeing suspects was self defense, and the court corrected them. So they had to have assumed Dunn was in a position of "defending himself" in the initial shooting.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)I'll have to look for the actual study (and more to the point, the actual data), as I have a few questions. In the main, I want to see if the bulk of the increase in homicide in SYG states occurred in cases where SYG was invoked and succeeded (that is, the homicide found to be justified), was invoked and failed (defendant was convicted), or wasn't invoked at all.
I'm also curious about the distribution between states that enacted SYG but formerly had "duty to retreat" laws and those that enacted SYG and in which the law was previously silent on that matter. My state, Oregon, has no explicit SYG law, but doesn't really need one: there's no "duty to retreat" here, as ruled by our Supreme Court.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)llmart
(15,548 posts)research. Uh-huh. Yep.
You're a bit too transparent. Maybe your first resource will be Guns and Ammo magazine? I bet their "research" is really believable.
billh58
(6,635 posts)wrote the Second Amendment: so that Americans can kill each other and carry out vigilante justice. It's the American way, and we hold the record for gun deaths over all other "civilized" nations. Yay.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)toddwv
(2,830 posts)That sounds like a more accurate description of these "Stand your ground laws."
DanTex
(20,709 posts)At the same time, no statistical evidence has been found that SYG has any deterrent effect in terms of reduced rates of burglary or robbery. I wonder, is gun nuttery going to yield to science?
Don't answer that...
cinnabonbon
(860 posts)Response to SecularMotion (Original post)
Boom Sound 416 This message was self-deleted by its author.