Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MikeOlsen

(62 posts)
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 09:17 PM Mar 2012

And guess who else might be opposed to the Keystone XL pipeline?

That oil is going to get transported one way or another, it already is.

But what interest would Bill "I've given billions to charity" Gates and Warren "please make me pay more taxes" Buffett have in stopping or at least stalling the pipeline?

The entity overseeing Bill Gates' personal investment portfolio is Cascades Investment LLC, based in Kirkland, Washington. By 2006, the stock portion of Cascade's portfolio was worth about $3.4 billion, with $1.4 billion of that invested in shares of Canadian National Railway Co. (CN).
Gates has been investing in CN since at least 2000, and during that time CN has been on a buying spree. CN bought up provincially-owned BC Rail in 2004, a controversial decision by then-Premier Gordon Campbell that made CN the only rail carrier in Northern BC - a decision that continues to rankle much of the electorate.
In 2006, CN bought 2 short-line railways in Northern Alberta: Mackenzie Northern Railway in the northwest and the Lakeland & Waterways Railway in the northeast. By the time of the Buffett/Gates visit, CN had also purchased Athabasca Northern Railway Ltd., linking Fort McMurray to Edmonton.
For his part, Warren Buffett had been busily buying up shares in the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF), which since 2006 has been moving diluents - diluting agents necessary for mixing with tar sands bitumen - from US refineries in the Gulf Coast, California and Kansas to the Canadian border (at Superior, Wis., Noyes, N.D., Sweetgrass, Mont., and New Westminster, BC). The carloads of diluents are then handed over to CN and transported to Edmonton for shipment to the tar sands.
So by August 2008, when Buffett and Gates made their surprise visit to northern Alberta, they were not just celebrities making a casual tour, but already involved in the future of the area.


http://www.watershedsentinel.ca/content/tar-sands-express-enbridge-northern-gateway-pipeline-or-railway-or-both

So America's 2 most visible Billionaires would seem to stand to increase their wealth even further if the project fails.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And guess who else might be opposed to the Keystone XL pipeline? (Original Post) MikeOlsen Mar 2012 OP
The two don't exactly coincide BlueToTheBone Mar 2012 #1
Why does this thread reek ? Trajan Mar 2012 #2
Because you would rather believe that Gates and Buffett MikeOlsen Mar 2012 #4
We talked about this at my caucus last month, and forwarded on a resolution expressing our support Brickbat Mar 2012 #3

BlueToTheBone

(3,747 posts)
1. The two don't exactly coincide
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 09:20 PM
Mar 2012

you know. The Keystone will be an environmental disaster (guaranteed) and the other is pocket lining (greed)

 

MikeOlsen

(62 posts)
4. Because you would rather believe that Gates and Buffett
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 10:06 PM
Mar 2012

are altruistic, socially conscious billionaires and not the effing upper 1% of the 1% stripping the wealth from the rest of us?

Back to you. It's your nose.

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
3. We talked about this at my caucus last month, and forwarded on a resolution expressing our support
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 09:49 PM
Mar 2012

for train transport over truck and pipeline.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»And guess who else might ...