General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRand Paul: Hillary Could Be Derailed by Little-Known Lewinsky Affair - secret told by Andy Borowitz
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)Potential Republican Presidential candidate Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) said today that he believes he has a secret weapon that will derail Hillary Clintons 2016 White House bid: A little-known affair between her husband and a White House intern, Monica Lewinsky.
Appearing on the Fox News Channel, Paul told the host Sean Hannity, Sean, when the American people find out about this scandal, they are going to be shocked, truly shocked. It didnt get a lot of coverage at the time.
Asked by Hannity how the scandal could have remained under wraps for so long, Paul replied, Youll have to ask Bill and Hillary that. Lets just say theyve pulled a lot of strings to keep this story out of the mainstream media.
Unfortunately for them, Sean, I have the details on this juicy scandal and Im prepared to share them with the American people, he said. I think its going to be a game-changer.
While he believes that the shocking revelations about President Clintons Oval Office dalliances will be enough to destroy Hillarys 2016 ambitions, Paul confirmed that he has other arrows in his quiver.
It turns out that Hillary was involved in a business deal called Whitewater, he said. When the American people find out about this, its going to blow their minds.
www.borowitzreport.com
Gothmog
(145,567 posts)Andy Borowitz has found the explanation as to why Rand Paul keeps pushing this story
malthaussen
(17,216 posts)Great stuff. Poe's Law rules.
-- Mal
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,505 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)I guess even Rove told that moron that this topic is a stinker-clinker!
Now all that's left is for the comedians like Borowitz to have fun with it...
Rex
(65,616 posts)He is way past the point of cray cray.
Gothmog
(145,567 posts)In this case, it is clear that Rand Paul really thinks that this is a good issue which is very sad
indepat
(20,899 posts)indictment of the electorate's judgment, rationality, and good sense imo.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)It just got a little chilly in here.
-wish I could rec a post-
Blue Owl
(50,505 posts)n/t
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)He can't talk about the issues because it would give away how out of touch he really might be. It should be a requirement before earmarks can go home with these guys they have to vote yes. An old Paul trick is to attach earmarks to a bill they know is going to pass, collect the money and run home to declare Oh, look what I brought home" and then declare I never voted for the money to be spent.
His dad did this and now I have heard Rand with the same crap.
Also, if Paul is going to bring up Bill's taking advantage of a female he needs to clean his house first.
Response to Mira (Original post)
Initech This message was self-deleted by its author.
wandy
(3,539 posts)Ok, I can't blame him if somebody going to make your job easier for you, you might as well take advantage of it.
It's just that its not fair. Writing satire about the great Teapublican champions comes down to changing a few words and switching the order of a few sentences.
Don't get me wrong, I admire Borowitz. But heck even I could do some piece of satire about Rand Paul getting all ticked off at some reporter and having his bodyguard stomp on her neck. That would be passable satire. Now if I added to the story how that might have helped Rand get elected.......
That would be worthy of Borowitz.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/25/rand-paul-supporter-stomps-head_n_773857.html
phantom power
(25,966 posts)"Monica who?" "Bill who?"
their play book is that empty?