General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMicrosoft Asks Windows XP Holdouts: Upgrade to Windows 8 Already
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2451550,00.aspWindows XP has but 59 days left to live officially, that is. On April 8, as we've reported numerous times previously, Microsoft is officially pulling the plug on the operating system. The not-so-insignificant number of users running the legacy OS will still be able to use it, but they won't be able to count on Microsoft for patches, updates, security fixes, and other forms of support past the cutoff date.
That's not quite news. What is news, however, is Microsoft's renewed efforts to convince these (stubborn?) users to switch over. We can only imagine that the flurry of communications, warnings, and outright insistence from Redmond will grow as we approach various milestones closer to the shutoff date.
At 60 days out, Microsoft's big communication is a new blog post that asks tech-savvy readers to help out those who need a little assistance making the big switch.
"As a reader of this blog, it's unlikely you are running Windows XP on your PC. However, you may know someone who is and have even served as their tech support. To help, we have created a special page on Windows.com that explains what "end of support" means for people still on Windows XP and their options to stay protected after support ends on April 8th," wrote Microsoft senior marketing communications manager Brandon LeBlanc yesterday.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)But too often that's the case.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font][hr]
steve2470
(37,457 posts)That was really egregious.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)that their machines meet 8's minimum requirements and 8 has all the necessary drivers
for their old hardware. I'd still consider upgrading to 7 instead.
Lancero
(3,015 posts)Odd's are that its now obsolete junk. It's doubtful that they will be able to run 7.
Lasher
(27,641 posts)It works just fine now but if I have to go to Windows 7 or 8 it probably won't.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)download and run WSUS Offline and grab all the updates available, put on thumb drive or external hard drive and you will be fine.
http://download.wsusoffline.net/
Alot of panic going around for nothing.
Lasher
(27,641 posts)Thanks, I will do that.
Rex
(65,616 posts)rock, more people would be inclined to move. Personally, I will NOT leave Win7 until I must. Microscrew is infamous for wasting OUR money on pointless new versions, while leaving behind great OSs for more PROFIT.
Bottom line - FUCK THEM.
yourout
(7,534 posts)Played with windows classic shell on 8 and I still think it sucks.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Blanks
(4,835 posts)Ironically, windows 8 looks closer to windows 3.1 than any previous windows interface.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Screw animations, gradients, shadows, etc.
If I wanted candy-coated shiny crap, I'd sell a kidney and buy a mac.
Silent3
(15,293 posts)Small icons, narrow taskbar, a Start menu that doesn't fill nearly the whole screen when it pops up.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)On both my home and work computers.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)rolling out windows 8.
sadly, a bunch of the support servers are windows 2012 server, which sucks badly...
Rex
(65,616 posts)OMG! The cosmetic changes are awful! I HATE the 'new look' for Windows! It is a desktop unit...not a fucking ipad wannabe! GRRR...
I will say however, it was easy to upgrade and use, just looks...blech.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)without knowing it would give me the regular log off\shutdown\restart options, because I didn't want to accidentally power down a support sever with dozens of people logged onto it.. I was embarrassed
Rex
(65,616 posts)I didn't expect them to apply it to the server OSs! Don't feel embarrassed, I had to get a book on 2012 Standard Edition since it is so different than 2003. Had to use a copy of 2008 just to get the dam thing upgraded!
Made me feel like I had XP and Win7. You need Vista to upgrade between the two!
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)Until they physically force me from Windows 7, I'm sticking with it. It has been the most stable version yet and I love it.
Rex
(65,616 posts)hands!
hlthe2b
(102,410 posts)Out of curiosity, I went to their website to see what options they were offering to XP users... A small discount on Win 7 or 8?
LOLOL... no way... In a few words their solution is to BUY A NEW COMPUTER.
Well, my laptop was intentionally downgraded to WIN XP so that I could still run some statistical software that was too expensive to replace... Thus, it is likely fast enough for 8, but if i do anything at all, it will be to find a WIN 7 license and move it over.
OR, I may just take it off the internet permanently so as to remove the major security risks from running un-supported XP.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)it is really much better.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)We're the minority opinion. If M$ had just tweaked Win7 with an option to do the metro interface, they would have been a lot better off. Forcing everyone to use the metro interface was a major fuckup and good example of groupthink. Even I had trouble adjusting to it and I've been using Windows for 21 years now.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)over 20 years. 8.1 is really pretty and quick. I've only been using it for about 2 months and it took some time to get used to. I still have problems moving photos around to different apps for work but it's getting better.
I have a 24 inch touch screen at my desk and it's fun to use with 8.1.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)Walk away
(9,494 posts)I lost Touch Screen and it wasn't as simple as updating a few drivers. I went on a blog search to find answers and nothing worked. I got in touch with Microsoft help and their answer was for me to buy their tech service for $160 and they would do it for me. After that I doubled down and tried a few more fixes. I honestly don't even know which one worked but by the end of the day everything was working perfectly.
p.s. I only had 8 because my desktop with 7 broke and Dell replaced it with a new one with 8.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)It looks like it NEEDS to be on a touch screen system.
Brainstormy
(2,381 posts)Hate it! And Really hate Windows 8.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)It is worthless. Yes, if you want to use those tiles, touch is useful. But I want my desktop to be MORE productive than my cell phone. I don't want to reduce my highly productive workstation environment to the level of a cell phone. I don't care how nimble a person's thumbs are, you can't do much productive work on a screen the size of 6 postage stamps. And I can't get that same interface to help me use a proper desktop environment.
Smart phones are great for what they do well. Pull up current weather? Get stock quotes? Do a little light Internet browsing? READ emails (but don't try to compose an email that includes serious content)? Yes, a smart phone is fantastic for these things. That's not what I do with a desktop. I do graphics, web design, music composition, studio recording, complex spreadsheets, large manuals. Sorry, touch just gets in the way using today's technology. Maybe there will come a time when this will work better. But even then, I don't want the same experience on the desktop that I have on the smart hone. I expect my desktop experience to be 100 times more productive, allowing me to do higher quality products and more complex tasks.
What about this is hard for Microsoft to understand? My guess is that their focus groups have been mainly millennium kids who have never done any jobs that actually require computer output that involves much planning and attention to detail.
Brainstormy
(2,381 posts)Mine goes crazy after any attempt to clean it, sometimes for 20 minutes, and shut down doesn't help.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)Maybe this will help
SteveG
(3,109 posts)The wifi drivers in win8.1 are wretched. My machine (a Toshiba) would not stay connected to the internet. This turns out to not just be a problem with Toshiba's, but with a lot of systems. And to make matters worse, 8.1 kept replacing the correct driver until I manually removed it from the system. It also does not work as smoothly with classic shell.
Win8.1's supposedly better start button is crap. I do tech support for a large university, and very few of our people are moving to win 8 or 8.1. we are staying on win 7 until microsloth cleans up it's act, as apparently are a lot of corporate users. We are only ordering machines with Win 7 pre-installed.
themaguffin
(3,828 posts)they should maintain consistency in style and function with 7 for desktops.
Tablets are different, but it's a pain in the ass to open applications in 8. It's ridiculous.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)One that was infuriating was that Win8 and Win8.1 screwed up my Printer/Scanner/FAX machine to the nines. That almost caused me to come to a standstill when I couldn't transfer important business agreements. I finally got in touch with the Printer troubleshooting people and was lucky enough to have gotten a guy who not only knew his shit, but knew what was F'ing up my printer. It turned out that Win8 and Win8.1 put a damned file on the computer that caused connected devices like Printer/Scanner/FAX to go nuts, working sometime, not at other times. The Printer rep logged on to my computer and went about the process of assisting me in fixing the problem.
840high
(17,196 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,372 posts)My vinyl-to-mp3 converter gave up the ghost at Vista (and win7).
So I have an old computer running XP just for that application.
I'd bet many old corporate applications will have trouble on Win8. And some are from companies that are long folded, so support is nonexistent.
I should try win8.1 one of these days. But not for work.
LostOne4Ever
(9,290 posts)They might be convinced.
TroglodyteScholar
(5,477 posts)...then people would have less reason to buy Windows 9 in whatever 5-10 months that'll take to hit the market.
Microsoft has learned one very valuable lesson from XP: don't make your commercial OS too good, or nobody will want to ever buy the next thing that comes along. No, just keep turning out pieces of shit...some will sink, some will float, and MS shareholders may be satisfied for another quarter....
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)line of business. For example, XP can't handle modern Graphics Packages, it simply doesn't have the horsepower. Many modern business spreadsheet Apps can't be done on XP. The problem with Microsoft, I hope that gets fixed now that Balmer is history, is that development teams don't fucking remember that lessons that previous teams had to learn the hard way. Instead of using every day users as Beta testers, Microsoft development teams appeared to have used religious computer geeks. A business person simply wants a system that allows him or her to conduct elements of business, that person doesn't give a shit about the inner workings of a computer or software unless those components prevent the person from doing what he or she needs to do.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I like XP. If I want to see something that looks like 8 on my computer, I'll watch Shepard Smith online.
Or use my iPad.
Warpy
(111,367 posts)because there were a few programs that refused to run on 7. I doubt they'd run on 8, either.
XP is still my favorite OS, rock stable, intuitive interface, plenty of things to do with it.
I haven't upgraded to 8. I'm still using 7. I have a touch screen computer (unless somebody steals it) that's all ready for 8. I just can't see upgrading to something I'll probably hate more than I hated 7.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)Things that won't run on Win7 that did run on WinXP probably won't run because they're 16-bit (you can't run 16-bit applications on a 64-bit OS without emulation), or because of using very old versions of libraries not supported under current Windows versions. XP mode or another emulator like DOSBox will solve that without needing to keep a separate XP machine.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It's like they had finally got things the way I wanted them and knew they weren't going to keep getting paid. I never bothered to switch to 8 after that. My mom has 8 on her computer and I gave to go over there and help her log on. It's bullshit. She's only 51 and she feels like an old lady trying to run a newfangled device. I'm trying to get her to just use her kindle for web surfing so she don't be all angry.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)Warpy
(111,367 posts)and I still have to wrestle to read the laptop screen. They limited the amount of dinking one could do, really important for those of us who are sight handicapped.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)It works on XP, XP X64, Vista 32 and 64, 7 -32 and 64, and 8.
Warpy
(111,367 posts)Unfortunately the stuff that runs on XP and doesn't run on 7 seems to be pretty rigid about it.
Sgent
(5,857 posts)you may try running them in a virtual machine.
I've got a couple of clients whose point of sale system is locked into XP. Its not as big a deal for the cash registers since they are functional -- but even the manager's software required XP or lower. It would fault out as it was using a 16 bit driver on anything newer.
A XP machine running in VirtualBox worked fine for me. One note though -- you'll have to have 7 professional to be in license compliance, or have a separate copy of XP Pro (Windows 7 comes with a virtual image of XP for this purpose, 8 doesn't).
tridim
(45,358 posts)And Windows 8 looks just like Windows 7.
I have no idea what you MS haters are talking about. Metro is NOT the desktop.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It works fine, why should I switch? It's their fault, you know. Windows Vista was so shitty I switched back and now I don't trust Microsoft.
tridim
(45,358 posts)Look at the rest of this thread, almost every post says the same thing, and they're all wrong. Laughably so.
Pssst DU, if you've never used Windows 8 it might be a good idea to not pretend that you have to feign outrage.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)just because it's Microsoft.
There's a rule somewhere.
BTW, what are these tiles everyone talks about?
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Use the live DVD and see for yourself. Unless you "must" use software that will "only" work with MS you should move away from MS. Wine can run a lot of .exe's.
BTW 12.04.4 works with the latest hardware.
TroglodyteScholar
(5,477 posts)Exactly
I only have one Windows box left, which I used almost exclusively to help my parents when they have trouble with their Windows PCs. I replaced XP with Vista last week (had an unused OEM copy sitting around)...and all of the built-in hyperlinks in the OS....you know, the ones that are supposed to help you with Vista problems? They almost all redirect to a hard-sell page with a table comparing Vista and 8.1. And Vista isn't even at EOL!
Fuck Microsoft. I run Linux Mint, OpenSUSE, and Bodhi Linux on my other machines. And they do all I need them to.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Did the original SUSE, Turbo, Redhat, Mandrake, Debian and FreeBSD which is also excellent for more seasoned admins but can run Gnome or KDE like all the others. I was just thinking of putting together another BSD box. I mean like how much does it cost to buy a second drive like a WD Raptor and install a free Ubuntu flavor? "Oh but I can't run games on linux" Silly excuse. Get a PS3 or 4 if ya want to play games ...duh
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)I will go back to Linux. I do run Ubuntu on one of my cores occasionally.
TroglodyteScholar
(5,477 posts)Last edited Sun Feb 9, 2014, 12:39 AM - Edit history (2)
Here's a screenshot of my laptop's Linux Mint Cinnamon desktop...
And, for good measure, Bodhi linux (Enlightenment desktop) running off a 4gb thumb drive on the same machine:
AllyCat
(16,234 posts)Maybe I can start loading it on one of our old machines and experiment. Ticked off about this XP thing. It works fine. My mom has a new machine with 8 and despises it. I can't figure out how to do anything on it. Looks like a stupid billboard, not a desktop.
go to http://www.ubuntu.com
Just download it. Its free and easy.
Personally I think that kubuntu is perfect for people used to windows xp, but your mileage may vary.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Set your bios to boot from cd to try it in live mode. I would suggest you use another drive for an install. Ubuntu will give you a menu for selecting xp or Ubuntu. 12.04.4 LTS = long term support to 2017
Paulie
(8,462 posts)There isn't one from XP to Win7 either. You can go Win Vista first but who will do that?
They should give away free Surface RT to anyone with a license of XP.
rocktivity
(44,580 posts)Last edited Sat Feb 8, 2014, 10:48 PM - Edit history (1)
I guess Windows has forgotten what happened when they said "If you love XP, you'll REALLY love Vista!" The fact that so many people STILL like XP should tell them something, LOL!
rocktivity
Incitatus
(5,317 posts)Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)When the software becomes obsolete before the hardware, you know there is really a serious problem.
Toss out that perfectly functional piece of hardware because the software no longer works? What bullshit.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)I don't even know what Windows 8 is. The whole concept of "one experience" is just stupid. That is like saying your toaster should have the same controls as your lawn mower or table saw. Or your shower should have a steering wheel so as to be more consistent with your car.
Damned morons in charge of that company.
Ballmer: Worst. Executive. Ever.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)XP systems don't have enough memory. Win8 is a freaking hard-drive hog and it drags in all types of files that further clogs up a computer.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)A real operating system for real people (except gamers).
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)It is the best solution imo.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)I replaced an old pc running win xp that I use with my microscope cameras for image capture with one running ubuntu.
I got wine set up and configured to run the image capture software just fine, but damned if I could get the cameras to be recognized.
Every time I dip my toe into linux for desktop use, I keep hitting a brick wall with drivers. Last time it was a graphics tablet.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)nVidia is still not very friendly to Linux and there are still issues if you use their proprietary drivers (sometimes, this box has an ancient 8600 video card and I've run the nVidia drivers for the last five years). Another potential issue is a few brands of WiFi antennas, but they are easy to fix except that you need to be online to access the help.
Ms. Thug just uses the Linux open source video drivers and has no problems with them, but high-end graphics are not vital to anything we do. Maybe the quality she gets is not good enough, but I don't see any difference in what she does do.
AMD has and continues to be the best refuge for those that don't want to deal with M$ BS.
OTOH nothing is perfect for everyone. One area are accountants and the like. Intuit has a virtual monopoly on retail accounting software, and has actively worked to keep their applications M$ only. Of course this fits their model of making their clients pay and pay and pay forever, just like M$.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)I use Nvidia Cards exclusively. Debian with DKMS. They are great.
It has been 4 years or so since I have had any driver issues. Even then, it was only obscure stuff that gave me issues.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)It's a camera that fits on a microscope for taking pictures. Definitely not mainstream PC-land stuff.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Was it you on this board? Or, do I know X_Digger IRL and just do not know it?
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)May have been him...
I did find this.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1097530
I remember looking at it when you first posted it.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)dmesg shows the event for the USB device being plugged in, and it shows up under lsusb..
But the software running under wine can't see the device.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)even under the best circumstances. There are probably things that can be done to fix it for you, but that's a road I don't want to travel on this thread.
That said, the first thing I would do is get in touch with the software company as many smaller and/or highly specialized companies already have Linux solutions, especially in the scientific software community.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts).. but there's not much to be had.
Any twain-like capture program would work for just taking pictures (even gimp), but the software really earns its keep with calculations it can do with measurements and cell counts.
ie, with a 100x objective lens, 21 pixels = 1µm, so this line you drew across the image is 580.15µm long.
Unfortunately there's also a language issue with the company, so they're not much help.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)The only reason for any of this is M$'s refusal to follow any standard protocols to lock people in, and then in buying our government/court system to allow them to commit crimes under the banner of laws they also bought.
Thanks Bill.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)for much better wine-type applications to run in. I might get the time someday to look into it.
LuvLoogie
(7,040 posts)I also have a 2006 iMac running Snow Leopard, an XP box and a windows 7 box. Haven't messed with 8 much. I can see how it would be confusing. I was confused.
I also ran XP in Virtual Box on the iMac. That was fun. I'm sure I could grow to like 8 once I figure it out and learn to avoid the pitfalls.
I do cringe when I run across a Vista machine.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)It sucks up your money, it sucks up your time, and it sucks up and mismanages your system resources so badly it is difficult to believe that it is not done on purpose.
Not to mention all the additional crap you have to put up with and the even more money you have to pay to other companies for their software and updates to keep the M$ OS sort-of safe.
EvilAL
(1,437 posts)I'd had enough of windows, so I decided to install Linux. It had a hard time to find my modem, I was still on dial-up then and really gave me a hard time and I almost gave up. Being on dial-up made it harder to get info and download fixes but I stuck with it until I got it to work, I'm stubborn that way especially with computers. After I got used to it I installed Ubuntu when I finally got hispeed internet service and never looked back.. I recently bought a mac mini and OSX is awesome as well, lot of great features and programs built in. I was gonna dual-boot my mac mini with Ubuntu Studio but decided against it since I have the old desktop running Ubuntu anyway and all I gotta do to use it is change the input on my monitor. Some people don't want Macs for whatever reason, this is my first one and I find it works fucking great. I rarely switch to Ubuntu Studio anymore. The one thing about Ubuntu that can't be beat is the help and everything from the forums and all the awesome programs people put out for FREE!! It took a lot of the hassle away from getting the stuff I wanted and either had to pay or fuck with cracks and all that other shit, sure it doesn't look as polished some of the time, but the functionality is awesome. OSX comes with most of the good music stuff I use for recording and stuff and everything else is a torrent away.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Sounds like you are perfect to work in this field. It's all about solving puzzles, at least that's how I approached it and it worked well enough that a bunch of people have paid me a bunch of money for me to solve their puzzles.
I used to love Apple, mostly because their OS is BSD Unix at it heart, so it just works. The problems came, I think, later when the marketing took over, which wasn't helped at all when M$ bought a big chunk of Apple to keep them alive.
EvilAL
(1,437 posts)a lot of people when their windows machines mess up. I've never sworn as much as having to deal with conflicts and i/o problems back in the day after a hard drive format with 95/98. Now it's mostly virus problems people call me for with Windows. My neighbor has Windows 8 and when I go try to clean it for him it's a pain in the ass. so ugly and bulky, nothing is where it should be, gotta click all kinds of shit.. I still help him when he needs it, but I hate when he calls, which hasn't been in a while, I guess he finally started using his anti-virus properly. I haven't used an anti-virus in years. I installed one on Ubuntu and tried to infect it, I went everywhere, shady pron sites, free this, free that for hours.. clicking licks and everything.. rebooted and did a scan, clean. I'm not too sure about the Mac, I'm thinking maybe I should slap one on just in case..
I haven't had any problems with OSX yet, it's only been a couple of months though.. when I do I won't be sure about how to go about fixing them, but that's the fun of it I guess..
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Yea they're pretty rare.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)To compound it, my W7 is the Pro version, and its nearly $200 for W8 Pro, which is asinine.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)I use it for a kiosk-type interface that I custom wrote in VB 6.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Finally dismantled it for parts.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)malthaussen
(17,217 posts)I'm sick of paying MS licensing fees for crap I don't want.
-- Mal
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I don't actually care enough to go that way, but some do.
malthaussen
(17,217 posts)I use my computer for limited stuff: playing old games, bullshitting on DU, watching the odd video. XP handles all that just fine.
I'm a firm believer in "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." The joys of consumerism temp me not.
-- Mal
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)who would have thought surfing the internet from the toilet could be so essential?
malthaussen
(17,217 posts)Response to steve2470 (Original post)
WeekendWarrior This message was self-deleted by its author.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Ever hear of Linux?
Timez Squarez
(262 posts)Windows 7 is the last OS I like.
If Microsoft was smart, they'd dump 8.1 like a hot potato and go back to 7 and make it faster.
Not clunky. Not tablet. Fast.
After Windows 7 crashes for the last time on this laptop, it's off to Linux.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)I had to get a new computer this last summer and I had no choice but to get one with Windows 8 already on there. Now, I've been using computers since DOS days and I had no problem at all transitioning to Windows Versions You Name It. But 8.0? I. hate. it. NOTHING is where it's supposed to be. I have to look EVERYTHING up on Google to find out where things are and how to execute the most menial tasks (example: Adding a printer).
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)The e is absolutely nothing at all on the "metro" interface I want to access. I have my pcs set up for specific purposes. They all run apps that wouldn't be on the Microsoft store.
I bought a notebook because I needed to do a little consulting on the road and I didn't trust by old XP Notebook (which was 8 years old and only successfully booted about one times in 3.) The only thing I could buy for a cheap price was a notebook with Win 8. How bad could that be? Really bad. I can't stand using it. Even with Start8 and (theoretically) disabling the Metro interface, running under 8.1, I still keep getting myself into that "tile mode" by accident. This has to be the most irritating software I have ever used in my entire life.
I will not convert any of my desktop machines to 8. I am looking to buy a very high-end machine to do recording studio work and I am determined to port my Win 7 disk to that new machine, I have worked out the procedures for doing this with Paragon Partition. That procedure will get me to end-of-life on Windows 7 for all of my desktops, which will probably be about 2019. If Microsoft is still run by idiots at that time, then I'll look for another solution altogether. I'll give Nadella a year to see if he can undo any of the damage done by Ballmer. I'm betting he is just as bad -- a product of Microsoft-think.
There is yet another "Windows 8 salvation" release coming out shortly. And this is just another case of doubling down on the same idiocy that got them into the Windows 8 mess is the first place.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2094722/why-a-leaked-windows-8-1-update-and-microsofts-new-ceo-bode-well-for-pc-lovers.html
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)Microsoft trying to help the poor tech illiterate. Except it's the techs who aren't switching to Windows 8. No one wants a goddamn phone OS on their PC.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)but it sucks dingo balls on a PC. We won't be moving off Win 7 in my company while I have any say in the matter.
Igel
(35,362 posts)I'd start to boot up Win 8 when I got home from work Friday and maybe, by the time I hit the sack on Sunday, it would finish booting.
The thing's going to be old enough to head to middle school on its own fairly soon. Might be able to replace it before it asks for a student driver permit. Afraid to see what it'll bring home when it starts dating.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)It is awful. It seems as if it's something that ought to be on a smart phone, not on a real computer. It's fun watching the staff at a computer store roll their eyes at the mention of Windows 8.
All I know is that almost all the upgrades every single time they come out with a new operating system are totally unnecessary.
I keep on saying that computers should be at least as easy to use as my stick shift car, although I'd like to see it as easy to use as a toaster.
I've been using computers a lot longer than most people out there. I went to work in the airline industry in 1969, just as airlines were computerizing their reservations systems. I got very familiar with a command line, and when a quarter of a century later I got my first PC, it wasn't that hard for me. I resisted Windows as long as I could, and almost every so-called improvement isn't.
Apparently the programmers and designers don't have mothers or grandmothers, because those are the people they should be testing new systems on. And, quite frankly, once those mothers and grandmothers get too savvy, new ones need to be found.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)I've had 7 at work for a year and getting used to it. Especially with things like Taskbar Tweaker, Classic Shell, etc.
I would have to be forced at gunpoint to use 8.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)It is unbelievable how badly Microsoft screws up with each release. it is as if they ask themselves what they can do that will most irritate their user base. Classic Shell, which is free, fixes a whole lot of those annoyances introduced with Windows 7.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)And it takes several steps to get it back. Why bother keeping it if you're just going to hide it from people? And why change something from a one-click step to a two-click?
Sometimes I think the designers there are just changing things for change's sake, and to justify their continued employment.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)They know that by introducing "new and better" (supposedly) OS's, that *some* people will buy them and feel pressured to upgrade. OF course, that helps their bottom line and their earnings per share, which pleases Wall Street and the major stockholders. It's NOT about keeping the user base happy. I was pleased as punch with Win7 and would have gladly settled for logical tweaks to it. Nooooo they had to totally fuck it up.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)I agree with you that they believe they can jam the new OS down their retail chain. The retailers always object at first, but eventually capitulate. So in that sense, Microsoft has learned that they can force the retailers to sell whatever crap they decide to produce.
BUT ... they cannot make the market accept it, and this is the part that world-class-moron Steve Ballmer never understood. Tell me if you think this is a successful product:
And tell me if you think this is performance shareholders should be happy with. (The orange line is the S&P500 average. The blue line is Microsoft stock.)
This is ABYSMAL performance for a high-tech company in a recovering economy. It isn't all because of Windows 8, but the thinking that gave us this piece of crap permeates that company.
I see absolutely nothing that gives me any confidence that Microsoft learned any lessons. The new CEO seems just as steeped in that Microsoft-think as the rest of the company management these days.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Ballmer and Win8 have been a disaster for M$. It's only because of their almost monopoly on the PC that they have survived. Maybe the new guy will do better, remains to be seen. I'd be pissed if I were a M$ stockholder.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)(I am a Microsoft shareholder and I am pissed.)
LisaL
(44,974 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)BelgianMadCow
(5,379 posts)a whole range of stuff I could get to work on that PC which I can't anymore.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)I opted to buy a used laptop on line with Windows 7.
WillowTree
(5,325 posts).......would be to upgrade to Windows 7. I just ordered a replacement with Windows 7 Pro for my 8 year-old desktop that runs XP. I'm running 7 Pro on both of my laptops and I've found it to be really stable. That should keep me for awhile.......at least until they come up with something better than Windows 8.
woodsprite
(11,930 posts)They ordered Dells, and to have Win 7 installed cost an extra $100 or so for each system, but our dept accommodated the request.
WillowTree
(5,325 posts)......on the machines still running XP at work, too. Nothing like waiting until the last minute.
woodsprite
(11,930 posts)Took the family to the mall the other day and we all noted that the MS store had about 5 customer and lots of salespeople standing around looking bored, where the Apple store was packed and even had a few people in line at the register.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,847 posts)nilram
(2,894 posts)After having to rebuild my machine several times after executing Microsoft updates. Was never the same update that caused it, and I'm very conservative with what I install on my machine. Apple's a mixed bag, too, imho, but their updates haven't bricked my machine (so far).
GoCubsGo
(32,095 posts)XP is on my ancient desk top. There is not enough room on my hard drive to make the switch. While I dislike the lack of future security fixes, I don't mind that there will no longer be updates. They really slow things down. If Microsoft wants me to upgrade my desktop, they can buy me a new desktop that can handle it.
That being said, my laptop has 8.1 on it. It was fine after I installed Classic Shell on it. It bypasses the idiotic "Metro", and goes straight to the desktop, which is pretty much the same as XP. "Metro" is asinine for laptops and desktops...
LisaL
(44,974 posts)newfie11
(8,159 posts)Save your sanity, run away fast if windows 8 comes your way.
PDJane
(10,103 posts)But the damn think f**** up my (non-standard) drivers on a regular basis. Hate it.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)corrupts the function of the Drivers. You have to know that file got added. I didn't know, but a Rep of the Printer company did and helped me fix the mess.
MineralMan
(146,336 posts)I use applications. I don't care what version of Windows is on my PC.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)fucking admit that and come up with real fixes.
rug
(82,333 posts)They're hardcore.
Lancero
(3,015 posts)[img][/img]
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)Worst. OS. Ever.
At least Windows 8 is functional, even if it does suck ass to do anything on it. ME was just a train wreck.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)Microsoft Bob was a 1995 Microsoft software product, intended to provide a more user-friendly interface for the Windows 3.1x, Windows 95 and Windows NT operating systems, supplanting the Windows Program Manager. Microsoft Bob presented screens showing a "house", with "rooms" that the user could go to containing familiar objects corresponding to computer applications for instance, a desk with pen and paper, a checkbook, and other items. Clicking on the pen and paper would open the word processor, and so forth. A cartoon dog named Rover and other cartoon characters provided guidance using speech balloons.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bob
Lancero
(3,015 posts)It's a GUI software.
But still, it sucked.
Jimbo S
(2,960 posts)on both the desktop and laptop. No plans to change. Will continue to use the machines until the motherboards fry.
no_hypocrisy
(46,230 posts)I'm thinking about installing the 7.
One question: will it affect my ability to access anything XP and prior in my Microsoft Word documents? Or should I "re-save" any pre-XP to XP documents in preparation?
I honestly don't understand how this works.
Thanks in advance.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Look at the file extensions of your documents (.txt or .doc , etc ). Wordpad or Notepad in Windows 7 should open .txt documents just fine, and you can get a free Word viewer to open .doc documents.
no_hypocrisy
(46,230 posts)Silent3
(15,293 posts)Windows XP to Windows 7 is a much easier, smoother transition. With a few tweaks, you can even get 7 to look and feel a lot like XP.
I'll probably stick with 7 at least until there's a Windows 9, hoping that Windows 9 will be to Windows 8 as Windows 7 was to Vista, Vista being another "upgrade" I happily skipped over entirely.
I hear that Windows 8.1 makes 8 a bit more tolerable, but I still haven't heard enough to lure me off 7 yet.
Then again, a good bit of the time I'm running OS X on a Mac anyway.
sendero
(28,552 posts)... and general lack of vision that they think the way to win in the phone market is to screw over their desktop users.
The phone market ship has sailed, it is never going to happen - the phone market is one place their lack of vision could not be overcome by monopoly practices and bullying.
Real smart.
Timez Squarez
(262 posts)Got any advice for me - just dumped Windows 7 for Ubuntu. I actually like how fast it is for a laptop.
Even my external mouse works just fine and acts the same way.
Now if I can find my substitute subtitle search program (and I use Subtitle.si a lot!)
OregonBlue
(7,754 posts)user friendly and much more stable. I'm using 7 because my computer came with it. My son and grandkids new computers came with 8. Both are a waste of time and memory just to run their stupid mobile style desktop.
Microsoft is so unresponsive to the needs of their users. Why not create a system for all the ultra young and ultra hip ultra creative, and maintain a good, reliable, stable version like XP for those of us who use our computers for work, not flash.
AllyCat
(16,234 posts)I don't want to buy a new computer. If I have to buy a new computer in order to have a "modern" OS, I'll get a Mac.
TheBlackAdder
(28,225 posts)whistler162
(11,155 posts)MS just stops issuing patches, fixes etc. for it.
TroglodyteScholar
(5,477 posts)...it just becomes infinitely more vulnerable than it already is.
Here comes the true age of the botnet....
TheBlackAdder
(28,225 posts)MY daughter has an XP laptop and she can't use it at her college because the OS is too old.
Once Microsoft drops XP support, all of the websites will follow suit, because the risk of viruses and malware will become too great!
Those PCs will be rendered useless and the poor and elderly cannot afford to buy new machines.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)Internet Explorer 8! Lot of FUD being spread in this thread.
TheBlackAdder
(28,225 posts)Third-party security products won't have a requirement to support code that is deprecated by Microsoft.
After all, if the OS company will not apply security fixes to their products, there is NO WAY that security companies can properly indemnify their security tools to prevent malware from infecting a desktop or from being spread. Office tools, browsers, etc. do not have to support WINXP-based systems either and XP will gradually get pulled from their product's support. Websites will shun XP machines as they might be potentially compromised. I do not perform eCommerce so I am not as much in threat. Sites that allows posts, file transfers, or eCommerce probably will.
I've been in IT over 30 years and I am an IT officer for a multi-national firm. I think the FUD are folks like you who think they posses some type of IT knowledge when your posts indicate otherwise.
ladyVet
(1,587 posts)So I'm stuck with that bad old XP, because my computer can't handle the newer systems.
s-cubed
(1,385 posts)Now before this launches a PC vs Apple war, let me say that I have had extensive experience with both platforms since the early '80's. There are pros and cons to both. But at this point I'll vote with my dollars.
And no, I won't get embroiled in a discussion of why.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)from page 10 of dead tree Maximum PC magazine, March 2014 issue:
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)I really don't think any personal PC user has to worry about their XP going poof on the Ides of March and I doubt if any hard-pressed institutions still running it on their library terminals etc on it really need to take immediate action either. But I imagine Microshaft would love to sell a few hundred thousand more licenses to its latest ugly duckling before they start giving it away for free . . .
steve2470
(37,457 posts)and supporting it. Eventually XP will become a true dinosaur like DOS is now. I tried running XP the other day and one of my apps kept crashing on it.
Shoulders of Giants
(370 posts)Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)...with IObit's free "Start Menu For Windows 8."
http://www.iobit.com/iobitstartmenu8.php
It restores the traditional start menu.
The other complaint...opening a PDF file and closing the doc but Reader stays open...is a minor one. I do CTRL-ALT-Delete and close it manually. Other than that, I have Windows 8.1 and it really doesn't bother me that much.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Right click Taskbar, Toobars, New Toolbar, go to C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows, click on Start Menu icon, voila...your own Start Menu on your toolbar. Yea it's a PITA but I'm used to Win8.1 now. Your method is much simpler, I have to admit.
tridim
(45,358 posts)"Open with" has worked the same way since at least Windows 95.
malthaussen
(17,217 posts)I think I can live without your support, thank you.
-- Mal
rocktivity
(44,580 posts)Last edited Sat Mar 8, 2014, 01:19 PM - Edit history (1)
Outstrips Win 8.1 surge
http://www.democraticunderground.com/109510354
rocktivity