Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 06:31 PM Jan 2014

Police Shoot Unarmed Man With His Back Turned And Arms Raised (GRAPHIC VIDEO in link)

Pinal County, Arizona- Police shoot another unarmed man to death. Manuel Longoria had turned away and raised his arms mere moments before an officer fired into him. A week later that officer is back to work. The video included below contrasts with the explanation given by police.

The Pinal County Sheriff’s Office said it investigated the shooting. That investigation found the officer’s use of force justified. But that was before the video taken by an onlooker surfaced. Now the phrase “suicide by cop” is being used. Judge for yourself.

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/01/26/warning-video-police-shooting-graphic-justified/

Manuel Longoria, of Mesa, AZ, had led police on a 40 minute chase in a stolen car. Police disabled the vehicle and Longoria got out. That’s when witnesses report, Longoria said he had a gun and wouldn’t be taken alive. But no one saw a gun, or any other object, in Mr. Longoria’s possession. No gun or weapon of any kind was found on scene.
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Police Shoot Unarmed Man With His Back Turned And Arms Raised (GRAPHIC VIDEO in link) (Original Post) MrScorpio Jan 2014 OP
Who To Believe? The Pigs Or The Dead Guy? SoCalMusicLover Jan 2014 #1
I am not a fan of cops. But he said he had a gun and initially looked like he was getting back... Logical Jan 2014 #2
I would like to see the report filed prior to the video surfacing. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2014 #5
90% chance the cops lied on the report. Cops lie all the time. n-t Logical Jan 2014 #6
They killed an unarmed man with his hands raised in the air. That's about 95% wrong. Comrade Grumpy Jan 2014 #11
You have to look at what happened before he raised his hands. You cannot go on a..... Logical Jan 2014 #16
If someone says they have a gun and so on, then they can expect lethal force quinnox Jan 2014 #3
They shot him in the back while he had his hands up. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2014 #7
fine, but if a guy leads the cops on a chase for 40 minutes, and then tells the cops quinnox Jan 2014 #8
I really can't argue that. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2014 #9
You won't look at the evidence, but you've made up your mind to support the police. Got it. Comrade Grumpy Jan 2014 #10
I gave more of an explanation in post #8 quinnox Jan 2014 #12
Oddly enough, it is legal to possess a gun in the United States. Comrade Grumpy Jan 2014 #13
Yea, but threatening police officers is a crime, and a bad idea quinnox Jan 2014 #15
Can't wait to get old and retire to Arizona....Seems like a friendly place. rgbecker Jan 2014 #4
Doctors used to say retiring there was good for your health. lpbk2713 Jan 2014 #14
I'm undecided. linuxman Jan 2014 #17
Have to wait & see, but there is a whiff of SBC, here. Eleanors38 Jan 2014 #18
 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
1. Who To Believe? The Pigs Or The Dead Guy?
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 06:53 PM
Jan 2014

Another Pig in fear for his life from a non-existent weapon. Well, if he THINKS he saw one, that's good enough. Give that pig a donut stat.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
2. I am not a fan of cops. But he said he had a gun and initially looked like he was getting back...
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 07:01 PM
Jan 2014

into the car. This after a 40 minute car chase. They did not want him getting back in the car.

The shots after he raised his hands were too much I admit. But at that point he had ignored many command to freeze.

I have many posts against cops. This one was not 100% wrong.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
16. You have to look at what happened before he raised his hands. You cannot go on a.....
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 07:37 PM
Jan 2014

40 minute car chase, risking people getting killed and then try to get back in the car.

I have 100s of posts against cops. In this case this guy caused his own death.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
3. If someone says they have a gun and so on, then they can expect lethal force
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 07:03 PM
Jan 2014

I am on the cops side on this one. That said, I didn't watch the video, nor am I interested in doing so. I am sensitive and am not interested to see a real shooting.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,330 posts)
7. They shot him in the back while he had his hands up.
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 07:14 PM
Jan 2014

In the pigs' defense, the guy was acting like a fucking idiot, including trying to get back in the car, up to the split second he turned and put his hands up.

On the other hand, the less than lethal bean bags and tasers worked and caused him to put his hands up. It kind of defeats the purpose of the less than lethal force if you shoot the guy after the less than lethal accomplishes its goal.

On the other other hand, who acts like such a fucking idiot with all those guns pointed at you? Now is the time to pucker up and hit the dirt spread eagle..

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
8. fine, but if a guy leads the cops on a chase for 40 minutes, and then tells the cops
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 07:17 PM
Jan 2014

that he won't be taken alive and has a weapon, I find it hard to blame the police for having an itchy trigger finger in that situation. That is my opinion.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
12. I gave more of an explanation in post #8
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 07:29 PM
Jan 2014

That is my opinion. Maybe I'm wrong, and it turns out these police officers are charged with wrong doing. I wouldn't have a problem with that, because I was not there, and am giving my first impressions.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
13. Oddly enough, it is legal to possess a gun in the United States.
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 07:29 PM
Jan 2014

I didn't know it was an instant death penalty offense.

lpbk2713

(42,759 posts)
14. Doctors used to say retiring there was good for your health.
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 07:29 PM
Jan 2014



Not if local law enforcement has anything to say about it!


 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
17. I'm undecided.
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 07:56 PM
Jan 2014

You can't really tell what happens that split second before the first pops. Why does the cameraman always jitter just before the most important part?

It sort of looked and sounded to me as if the first few thuds were the sounds of beanbag rounds or something from a shotgun, meant to disable the man and get him down. Instead of the desired affect, he instinctualy sought to get away, which he unfortunately tried to to be going for the drivers seat in the vehicle.

Like I said, I'm on the fence here.

Do you let the guy get back into a vehicle and speed away, likely killing someone in the process? Was he going for a weapon in the vehicle? Would he have gone for the vehicle at all had he not (by my conjecture) been hit by less-lethal shots just prior to making a move for the car?

At first glance, this looks pretty black and white, but I'm not so sure how to call this one. Sucks that he dies though.

One of the big problem with firing stun rounds out of a conventional firearm is that nearby officers may think you are firing a real gun and fire as well in order to bring down a threat. Not uncommon for a guy to get hit with a beanbag and then have some dumbass put a few 9mm into him.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Police Shoot Unarmed Man ...