General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOk, no more Obama bashing. It's Over, you PUMAs
PUMA means - Party Unity My Ass. PUMA
Guess what? Get partied up. Obama is the leader of our party.
We stand at a time when party unity was never so important for our country and the world. The Democratic party must become the majority political party in every legislature, every governorship and in the US congress.
We have about 4 months to get it together to be able to steamroll the republicans in this year's elections.
So my advice to all you who just love to stir the divisive stuff, is that you bury it for the next year, starting now.
DU, as a community, must pull together, put aside the differences and present a unified face to the world. Think we can do it? Yes, we can.
demmiblue
(36,864 posts):holds mirror:
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Me First!!
I am putting it all in the oven for a year. From now until then, I will not speak ill of Obama or my Democratic Party. Yep, being the change I want to see.
PU on DU! And on the streets. Yearghhhhh!!!
quinnox
(20,600 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)(not really, but euwwwwww)
xocet
(3,871 posts)Skittles
(153,169 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)When he drops the TPP and corporate education reform maybe more people will stand up for him. When he supports teacher and labor unions and proposes a real living wage not the $9/hr wage he has proposed maybe more people will stand up for him. When he fires Arne Duncan and repeals Race to the Top maybe more people will stand up for him.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)That will be fine by me.
The republicants are laughing at us for not supporting Obama or the party. Right?
-p
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Elections are largely about turnout. What a president does has an effect even if he's not running again. Look at what Shrub did to his party in 2006 and 2008.
Tansy_Gold
(17,861 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)truth2power
(8,219 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)roody
(10,849 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)Is he seriously suggesting :
"Grab your ankles" "Whack!!" "Thank you sir may I have another?"
-p
dflprincess
(28,079 posts)We've heard him give pretty speeches before.
840high
(17,196 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)I don't sign loyalty oaths.
markpkessinger
(8,401 posts)HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)But be prepared if one decides to bash our Democrats. This is, imo, a war. We either fight together or we get at least another 2 years of republicans driving us over the cliff. It is simple; want to vent? Vent on republicans.
I get that there are many who are think they are so independent and oh so perfect that they don't feel they have to be quiet for just a bit. And I can be like that myself. But now is the time to spend our limited energy on one direction, and that direction is to overwhelm them at the ballot box.
Yeargghhhh!! All 50 States!
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)..no matter which party, politician, or celebrity is in power.
"Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost." --John Quincy Adams
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)For the next year preface it with the fact that the republicans are to blame for 99% of the government's abuses. Is that so hard to do?
Distant Quasar
(142 posts)I despise everything about the Republican Party, but Republicans are responsible for only about 50 percent of the abuses I find truly despicable. The other 50 percent are bipartisan.
Response to Distant Quasar (Reply #35)
HangOnKids This message was self-deleted by its author.
nice.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)I say he's had the magic wand all along.
-p
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)or so I learned in another thread. Guess 5 years -- 5 fucking years -- is the magic time limit.
The American Presidency Project -- Executive Orders
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/orders.php
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)asking for blind partisanship. Been there, don that. over nad over again. Didn't work, now what else do you have to offer? Is the President going to abandon the TPP disaster for America's Working Class? Any news on ending the brutal, criminal Drone program? How about 'NO CUTS TO SS'? Remember, the Chained CPI? Is it off the table yet?
I know too many great Americans who are suffering to be willing to sign any Loyalty Oaths. Did that already and deeply regret it.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)The 47% will not vote for me.
Our goal is no second term for Obama.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)whatever. Don't know what you are trying to convey but has something happened that I am not aware of? Like investigations of war criminals eg?
Wake us up when something like that happens.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)What good will it do at the executive meetings to sit around and pronounce "woe is us"? When we are staffing campaign offices and someone comes in, do we start telling them how unhappy we are to have Obama as president?
Have you seen how many military brass have been laid off? Petraus anyone?
Do you realize how the republicans will bash democrats? And we should join them in their bashing?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Bashing: not liking something or someone for no reason
Criticism: not liking something or the actions of someone but with valid reasons for doing so
bobduca
(1,763 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Critiquing was not in my OP. Bashing was. What you just did was a bashing of the idea that we need party unity. See the dif?
Jackbooted loyalist? That was a bash. A mean spirited trash term. And you use it to describe me, a good Democrat? WTF? Yep, this OP is about that type bullshit.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Because most everyone I know in real world politics would not agree with you.
They know we need to come together to beat the VRWC.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)going on whether or not we need to come together just to beat the other team.
bobduca
(1,763 posts)I will only post positively-wise moving forward and looking upward-wise.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Who's next?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)our elected officials who we put into power would do at least some of the things they promised.
We expected at the end of the nightmare Bush years to see a few things happen such as:
1) Prosecute the War Criminals
2) Prosecute the Wall St Criminals
3) End all of Bush's fake wars
4) Close that stain on our country, the torture chamber at Guantanamo Bay
5) End the Orwellian, supposedly temporary, Constitution destroying Patriot Act
6) Protect Social Security and end the lie that it had anything to do with the deficit
7) End tax breaks and subsidies for Corporations who outsource American jobs
8) Reform Health Care not Health Insurance, at least a Public Option
9) Stop Bush's Privatization of our Educational System
10)Stop Spying on the American people. They were supposed to 'fix' that airc
I could go on, but you get the picture. We were all very united in 2008 and we 'won'. The battle, but we lost the war.
So what are you asking us to unite for? Another Corporate Friendly Congress filled with DLC/Third Way Corporate stooges?
Give us something to unite around and you might have a point. But it's a different time now. We've seen the results of 'winning' so we're not as excited about it as we used to be.
Beating Republicans isn't going to do much good. They seem to run things even when we win.
And what is this bi-partisan thing where we do most of the compromising even when we win, and our Dem President can't find Democrats to put in Cabinet positions so we get the very Republicans we threw out of office, BACK into powerful positions in the Government anyhow. SOD eg. Clapper in Intel and on and on.
Just joining hands and being united isn't very tempting anymore.
See the numbers of people who no longer identify with either party now? Good luck asking them to unite back to the Dem Party who told us they don't need us anyhow, our ideas are 'retarded'.
Sorry, not buying.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)We have reason to be disappointed.
I live in NC. I am experiencing losing. Just a few more republicants in office and NC is going from a first world state to a third world state.
Obama is not responsible for most of your list of complaints. He inherited them because bush was in office for 8 years. The main reason bush was in office for 8 years was because Gore just wasn't good enough.
Gore just wasn't good enough. God damn that all to hell!! This would be a different world without that mofo bush in office for 8 years. And NC would still be making progress with just a few more "not good enough Democrats".
It is not the Democrats fault this country is so screwed up. Democrats are responsible for Min. wage, SS, Medicare, civil rights, and a host of other good things that we accomplished over the opposition of the republicants.
I am sorry you have no respect for that history or for the immediate suffering of millions who suffer because the republicants won too many elections the last few cycles. But you feel great because you are standing high demanding perfection and willing to see Democrats be defeated and replaced by republicants because they are just not good enough.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Since when did standing on principle become a bad thing in our Party?
That tactic too won't work anymore.
Bush didn't do it alone, he got help from many of those Corporate Dems I mentioned above. And Gore didn't lose, the election was stolen and nothing was done about that either. Republicans STILL control the voting machines, as if THAT wasn't a disgrace in itself. Privatized Elections too, thanks for reminding me.
Present us with Candidates who will never cast a vote for Bush policies and we will rally to their side.
,
Present us with Candidates who will not back away from TELLING THE TRUTH to the American people and won't sugar coat it by calling all the travesties of the past dozen years resulting from Bush policies and THOSE WHO VOTED FOR THEM, 'mistakes'.
Repeating the same thing over and over expecting a different result is foolish. And we did that, over and over, now it's time to change course.
And tell the Party to stop attacking the Left, calling their ideas 'retarded', sending out their 'messengers' to slam them for caring about this country. We are getting the message. They don't want the Left in the party, they just want their votes and their energy and their donations to KEEP THEM in the party.
It's up to the Leadership of this party to earn votes from those they and their messengers have trashed on a regular basis. Maybe we could see a few Progressive Dems in the Cabinet rather than 'Republicants' eg.
Maybe they could assure the voters that they will NEVER vote for the job destroying TPP. I know, too much 'perfection' to ask to keep US jobs at home.
Maybe they could assure the voters, who overwhelmingly support SS across party lines so there isn't even a political risk in doing so, that they WILL DROP the cuts to SS in the form of the Chained CPI.
Maybe they could explain why Offshore Drilling hasn't done much for Americans in terms of, what was promised, no more dependence on foreign oil, and better prices etc.
Sorry to be so demanding of 'perfection'. What should we be demanding in your opinion? Nothing, something, crumbs, perfection?
There's an old saying that could not be more true:
Aim for the stars and you might hit a tree
Sure, what we want is perfection. Heard that derogatory statement so many times now it only makes me wonder why they don't spend more money to buy new talking points. Even 'perfect' talking points lose their power after a while.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)He actually did better there than any Democrat since.
Same reason Romney had no chance of winning Massachusetts.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Couldn't be THAT Red.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Usually Blue Dogs.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)bashing, is never finding a positive side...there is plenty of bashing going on by the same names over and over...when pressed up thread to place some blame on the Republicans, the bashers can't get themselves to do even that.
Honest criticism, acknowledging the good and the bad doesn't seem to come from the bashers. Nothing noble in your comment just made up shit.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Does that mean they are hands off, because criticizing them would be bashing?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)WTF?
By all means continue bashing...... just know it will be called "bashing" and not "constructive critisism".
No one is saying you can't bash...but don't expect it to be received as anything but.....
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)I said, "Some issues don't have a positive side".
Whisp
(24,096 posts)hmm, I must be mistaken because the RE I recall was very anti-Obama.
maybe the aliens got to ME instead???
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)But the bite was in 1789, I believe...
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)You need to have your memory tested.
Unless you have been following me around how would you know? Hell yes I have been critical of Obama. Only a blind person would not. But I don't bash him. And from now until next year, after the election, it will be rare that I will spend any time at all focusing on any of the bad things Obama has or is doing, just the good. The time is now to put aside the differences, and work to keep unity in the party so we can elect a full slate of Democrats to office this year. You in, or out?
Whisp
(24,096 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)feel free to post it. Otherwise I have no idea what this is all about.
I will never remain silent about policies that are harmful to the American people if that's what you are asking. Politicians are not that important to me, ISSUES are.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)We were just having a discussion about not bashing. You, as far as I have seen have not been one to just bash anyone. You can be critical but you do it intelligently and with reason. There are others who do like to bash Obama and the party. It does deserve criticism, but not bashing. Both, in these next few months leading up to the election, I feel, need a large measure of loyalty from us Democrats.
I used to run with a lot of good old boys in politics. We didn't sit around talking about how bad we were and how the party sucked. No, we talked about how to keep seats in our party's hands. And guess what? It worked. I like going with what works. Being a PUMA type and saying screw party unity, does not work.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)of us who joined up when it first started as a reaction to Bush II stealing an election by way of the Supreme Court.
If you want a total Dem Centrist Lock Step Devoted group of people...there's "Daily Kos" and "Move On. org" or any number of Neo Lib Sites that might suit you.
Remember...Dem Party is the BIG TENT PARTY...and trying to disparage Democrats who have as much right to be here as you do...does seem to be a bit "Republican Tea Partyish" sounding.
Why are you doing this?
diabeticman
(3,121 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)Fukushima Robert Earl Fukushima!
cui bono
(19,926 posts)No thanks.
I'll get my pom-poms out when he starts working for us and not the banksters and corporations.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Yet the Obama drill team is marching on. A tad out of step, but marching on.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)Do you think the world cares what we argue about here on DU? Honestly?
This has nothing to do with what the world wants. This is what you want. You don't want to read criticisms of people who aren't doing what they're supposed to do.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)You don't? You don't want to win the state houses and congress?
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)are going to change electoral outcomes either way.
Do you honestly think "the world" pays attention to what is said on DU?
n2doc
(47,953 posts)Let me know if that changes. Until then I will direct my energies and cash towards electing democrats to those offices, and supporting my President when he has policies I wish to support. And opposing those policies of his that I don't support.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)ALL POWERFUL (even after losing everything btw) Republicans from standing in our way.
So explain what 'winning' means to the Working Class. It's been 5 years since we WON everything and we're not seeing the results in Education, in War, Drones, Spying on the American people, the TPP, the Pipeline, Fair Taxes on the Wealthy, JOBS that actually pay a living wage,
Most of all we have seen ZERO accountability for Wall St and War Criminals.
Whistle Blower protection, I could go on and on.
Winning is over rated as we found out pretty quickly. But what is your view of 'winning'?? More Third Wayers who slap a 'D' after their names then vote for every Corporate issue that finds its way to Congress?
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I vaguely recall 2009 -10.
Oh yeah, here it comes back.
Pelosi was the Speaker.... the house was the most productive ever. The economy was turned around. Obamacare passed by something like one vote.
Progress.
Then we understandably got a bit miffed we didn't get more and the republicans won. Win/lose. And here we are. I'd rather we just kept winning. This election we should win. But we may blow it.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)about party unity. THEY are the Party, don't you know? It"s their way or they'll be just as happy to be enablers of Republican rule.
Besides, who's to say they're Democrats to begin with? With all the anti-Obama and anti-Democratic Party posts they post, when do they have time excoriating the REAL enemy of this country - the Republicans?
The writing is on the wall. They claim to want everything - or be prepared for more Republicans in Congress that, in turn, will allow them to rant and rave for another two years under a President they never supported to begin with.
Don't be fooled. The usual suspects got their marching orders and, damn it! They're going to march this country over the cliff all the while ranting and raving until you hear their pathetic cries fade into the distance.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)I was wondering when that one was coming.
Wow! Your post is just......Wow!
-p
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)We have our 'marching orders!' from the evil empire by golly!
sendero
(28,552 posts)... your sign.
Now THATS funny.
I don't care who you are.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)Polls show 56% of likely voters hate it, and they're going to take it out on her. Tillis is up by 7%, and Dr. Teabagger is up by 4%.
Regress.
bobduca
(1,763 posts)Cause effect. they are related somehow, maybe through wishes and good intentions of democrats on this board we can make that happen! everyone just has to police their posts and only post positively about all democrats regardless of their positions!
last1standing
(11,709 posts)Baaaa baaaa baaaaa baaaa baaaaa baaaa baaaaa baaaaa baaaaaa. Baaaa baaaa baaaa baaaaa baaaa baaaaa baaaa, baaaa baaaa.
Translated: Be a good little sheep. Do not question authority or your lot in life. We will tell you when to speak, little sheep.
All I can say in response is "Baaa Baa!"
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)And why would you want us too? Hold Obama's feet to the fire. He's a centrist, wall-street guy, and unless he feels like our votes matter, he will govern as a centrist, wall-street guy.
Bryant
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)I should jump up and down and cheer?
If he decides to attack Iran I should shut up?
If he decides to stay in Afghanistan till 2024 I should go and hide?
Sorry. You want blind obedience? You need to switch parties.
I am happy to give Obama kudos and support him when he deserves it and I'm happy to take him to task when he does something stupid.
progressoid
(49,991 posts)When Democrats act like Republicans, they get no support from me.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Will you sit silently by while they read and discuss, or will you put yourself in THEIR path and demand that they not give the agreement the up check?
Or will you be willfully obtuse to their conduct, and only excoriate the executive branch, after the Congress presents it for signature?
It's a fair question...there are many hoops that TPP has to jump through before it hits the President's desk.
He's not a king. There are some small things he can do unilaterally, but there's lots he cannot do.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)wandy
(3,539 posts)For all the times I have cursed the back-boneless Democrats in congress.
For the deceptions and sellouts in the last few years.
Only one question remains.
If this is a mess, what in all hell would it be like had Sir Romney of blue-blood and his gang of robber barons come into power.
I will 'bicker' with Democrats, but you can't argue with fools and takers.
I'll hold my nose if I have to.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)For all our disagreements and all our fighting in the party, we must remember that the reason neither McCain or Romney are presiding over us, is because the Democratic Party - all the rednecks, the liberals, the honest gun owners, many capitalists and other diverse individuals, voting together, are why Obama IS presiding over us.
Together, we did something few 8 years ago could imagine possible.
United we stand, divided we get Bheonered.
wandy
(3,539 posts)Our strength is that we argue amongst ourselves until we find a path.
Sheep, we are not.
I don't ask that any two Democrats to totally agree on any direction.
I just trust we can agree as to where we do not want to go.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)rank and file Democrats would have unified against:
* Warrantless surveillance by the NSA
* Drone murder
* Indefinite detention and Gitmo
* the TPP
* Chained CPI
* a President claiming the authority to execute citizens with no due process
* attacking a sovereign nation against the specific resolution of Congress
* education "reform" that punishes teachers
As it stands, too many rank-and-file Democrats now defend these policies because one of their tribe is in the White House.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)because he was a more progressive person when he was running. Now that we've seen 5 years of third way you can't blame people for being upset. And we all know Hillary is going to be more of the same. We need Better Politicians, the support will follow.
We need to see substance in the words he uttered not the opposite action.
Be honest about the situation please.
-p
Maven
(10,533 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)Priceless.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)That 'tude, the party unity my ass, needs to go away.
Party Unity is the most important thing in today's political world that we can envision.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Busting into another's post is rude and cheap. Go away.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Hang on, this place goes out of your control sometimes.
Can't stand the heat? Get out of the kitchen.
Said one of the best Democratic presidents ever.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)Exactly. It isn't under YOUR control, either. People are free to say what they want to say about people they voted for who aren't holding up their end of the bargain.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Do you really not get that calling people names and demanding they shut up and fall in line behind your position is *bad* for party unity, not good?
If you really care about party unity, the only way to work towards it is to make concessions to the people you disagree with, not to demand they do so to you.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Who's a PUMA? I thought they wore that proudly? Are you saying that they don't like being called a PUMA?
There are quite few things that will get one banned from DU. Demanding Party Unity is NOT one of those.
And as for kissing the ass of anyone who wants to divide our unity, put me in the column of not doing so for the next year. DU's reason for being is getting Democrats elected. Guess what? It's election time. We all need to get with the program.
YEARGGHHH!!
oldhippie
(3,249 posts).... I think you should delete that.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)It didn't end well.
Those who don't know History will be condemned to repeat it.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Better chance to have better government. It is that simple.
A year from now, heck even a little sooner, we can all go back to chewing on ourselves.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)And I mean that sincerely.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Love the way you play small ball bayer.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)I don't know whether to be flattered or insulted.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)You rock!
cbayer
(146,218 posts)I don't often get a compliment around here, so I will take it.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Get over it already.
But since you mention it, Sen Reid's man in the NRC, a fella named Jazcko, has raised the alarm about the dangerous nuke plants in the US. He has said we should close many, yesterday. And the republicans got him fired for that.
So yeah, lets get more power in Reid's hands. You have a problem with that?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Or maybe the time-traveling radiation changed your past.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Is that something you forgot? You deny radiation being a part of life on the planet?
Say, you aren't one of those who think nuke power is safe, are you?
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Distant Quasar
(142 posts)There's always an election coming up, and we're always being told that the next election is the most important election in the history of the world. So I have the feeling your answer is "never."
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)This is a campaign for Party Unity.
Distant Quasar
(142 posts)I can just feel the unity brewing on this thread.
Has it ever occurred to you that perhaps telling people to shut up and suppress their deeply held beliefs is not the best way to win them over to your point of view?
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I said those who hold with the PUMA, that that kind of talk was not going to get democrats elected. Pretty simple, really.
Someone asked what good DU could do in the world. Guess is that person is new to DU. Here is my reply to that. DU inspired me to take action on a local level against a bunch of loudmouth republicants. There was more than a little success because of us uniting as a party. And DU played a role in that. YMMV.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)(which they are) and next you push the sheep meme and we should not be PUMAs. Now that is what I call priceless.
By the way, I see this did not go the way you intended either.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Top hits of 2008, here we go!
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)<clicks heels>
bvar22
(39,909 posts)I'm IN... as long as we UNITE behind these issues:
*End the Drone Bombings
*Restore the Constitution to pre-Patriot Act levels
*Restore Taxes and Trade Policies to pre-Reagan rates
(71% on the top bracket)
*Tax Capital Gains as income
*Reissue a NEW and BETTER Glass -Steagall Act
*Restore competition in the US Media (Break Up the Big Boys)
*Raise Minimum Wage to $14.00/hr.
*Institute a REAL National Public Option for Health Insurance
*End the failed War on Drugs
*Cut military spending by 50% this year,
and another 25% next year.
*End the Foreign Occupations
bring the Troops Home
*Re-Task our Military to National defense ONLY
*Use the money save from the Military Cuts to build a State of the Art
National High Speed Rail and Transportation system using ONLY American manufactured parts
and local labor.
*Embrace FDR's 2nd Bill of Rights as the Democratic Party Platform
*End ALL "Free Trade" Deals,
and renegotiate Trade on a bi-lateral basis emphasizing American Jobs, HUman Rights, and Environmental Protections
*Recind China's MFN Trade Status
*Break Up everything Too-Big-to-FAIL
*reissue the Sherman Act specifically forbidding large, out-of-state corporations
from moving into small towns and undercutting locally owned businesses
*JAIL the Wall Street Bankers with Public Perp Walks
*FREE Chelsea Manning
*Free Don Seigelman
*Make EFCA (Card Check) the Law of the Land
*FUCK MONSANTO, and expel their lobbyists and lawyers from the USDA and the FDA
....as soon as YOU can unite with ME behind the above issues,
I'm sure we can all present a United Face to the Nation.
Thanks!
--bvar22
[font color=firebrick][center]"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans.
I want a party that will STAND UP for Working Americans."
---Paul Wellstone [/font][/center] [center] [/font]
[font size=1]photo by bvar22
Shortly before Sen Wellstone was killed[/center][/font]
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)And how do we get 'er done?
By having a democratic controlled congress. That is the first rung on that ladder.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)to advocate what "bvar" is posting. It's not what you've said on this post calling people names and such. I've not seen a post advocating anything but some kind of unity to get behind a name.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)But now I'm back. It's time.
We're both in NC. I had a great rep in the legislature. He would agree to about half of what bvar says. Just half. But in his years he kept the state going pretty good. Lots of good programs. Now? He was voted out of office and the liberals around here, which are few, would not support him. "He's not good enough" Well, shit, now we have a republican dominated legislature.
Hows that f'n working out for us?
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)sendero
(28,552 posts)... in your words. As we have seen all too clearly in the last 20 years or so, just because someone calls themself a Democrat doesn't mean they really are.
Of every Democrat in congress RIGHT NOW, I'll be there is not ONE who would endorse even 50% of that list. NOT ONE.
And they enable the bad bad Repubs at every turn. With friends like most Democrats in congress, who needs enemies?
THAT IS THE PROBLEM, A MENAGERIE OF FAKE DEMOCRATS. GETTING MORE FAKE DEMOCRATS ELECTED ISN'T GONG TO DO ANYTHING GOOD.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Glad I waded through the rest of the inanity to read it.
diabeticman
(3,121 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Maybe you're onto something?
bemildred
(90,061 posts)cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)Throd
(7,208 posts)Sign the loyalty oath or these men shall escort you down the hall.
Rex
(65,616 posts)while also causing strife? Silly Billy!
alarimer
(16,245 posts)Think for yourself.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)You sucked in half of GD on that one..
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)They are so easy, they fell right over.
Really, tho, as someone who has been chewed on by this board, I realize that our meanness knows no bounds.
If we could just get them to chew on republicans, instead, my toenails might grow back.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I'm still
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)You think asking for party unity is trolling?
You think beating republicans at their own game is wrong?
I am not clear what it is you are attempting.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Right up there with Manny G..
Phlem
(6,323 posts)-p
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)I'll admit, you really got me when you were citing ENENews.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Did you mean Adolf Hitler or Eddie Hitler? There is a difference, you know.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)I think you meant well with this thread. Just thought I'd say so.
That said, if Democrats will stand for and work for the people, they will win. Please, everyone, remember Truman:
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Harry_S._Truman
-Laelth
Armstead
(47,803 posts)MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)but I do appreciate the wonderful attempt in trying to bury the divisive stuff by shouting PUMA in your post. Well done.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)and hope you can stir up some enthusiasm and loyalty, much needed at this time. We shouldn't kick someone when they're down then grab their coattails when they come into money, and that's true of anyone whether they're your neighbor or your President.
xocet
(3,871 posts)riversedge
(70,242 posts)Assuming she is the Candidate??? IN that case, as I recall, there will be no resistance from any PUMA's--if any still exist.
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)Like some moran Teabagger - spouting the same lies & the same shit that you get from the GOP propaganda network. Then they bemoan the fact that their favorite social justice issues are ignored, sidetracked & struck down due to Republican influence in Congress and the courts. As if there's no connection between between the two.
Clueless. Clueless. Clueless.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)I haven't seen so much shit brained, goofy fucking idiocy, toilet speak in my life in a thread ever.
Jeebus!
-p
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Response to baldguy (Reply #199)
Phlem This message was self-deleted by its author.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)read U'r Post again and think TTP.
Jeebus fucking Christ. I didn't know you were such a rocket scientist.
And Check it again, yoooor post is full of fail.
-p
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)If you're going to mock someone's intelligence, the use of poor spelling/grammar make you look foolish.
Read your post again and think 6th grade English.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Another addition to my ignore list.
-p
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)It's Bobbie Jo, and knock yourself out.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Names, please. Pathetic that you keep using "liberal" as an epithet like some row asshole. Are you a liberal?
baldguy
(36,649 posts)"Liberals" certainly aren't liberals.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)I guess that'll show you.
-p
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)However he did not name the names
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...around NSA domestic spying?
aristocles
(594 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)We need to pull the party to the left before the elections. Please??
trueblue2007
(17,228 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I never want to see another republicant controlled house of reps, or in my state legislature.
Lost my rep in NC who was great, and now we are in a deep hole.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Have been done would that, for several decades. And...
DULink: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024392050
The problem is the that the Democratic Party is just as susceptible to the donor/vulture class, as the GOP is. Not as fully as the GOP, but far more than a party that allegedly purports to defend the working man and woman should be.
So we will continue to call out those that fail the VERY BASIC TEST... of being a Democrat.
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)I said that is quite appropriate, to lambast both the Republican Thugs, AND the Democratic Quislings.
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Gothmog
(145,303 posts)We can use some help with the GOP idiots who are attacking Wendy Davis.
Thanks WillyT
-p
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)OmahaBlueDog
(10,000 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Yeeeaaaarrrgghh!
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Not many have been earning it lately.
jazzimov
(1,456 posts)if we have more Dem's in power.
Yes, even the DINO's. At this point, it's about numbers.
Next year, we can all go back to bitchin' about who's not "liberal" enough. Right now, it's about numbers.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Most of the people here doing the worst bashing didn't vote for Hillary in the primaries.
Response to RobertEarl (Original post)
NuclearDem This message was self-deleted by its author.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)Blind faith in the lesser of two evils is hereby demanded? Criticism of our leader is forbidden?
You gotta be able to see how creepy that is.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)First parodying the extreme arguments against the NSA with the Nazi metadata thread, then the paranoid radiophobes with the starfish thread, now the party unity line.
It's got to be a joke. Otherwise it's just disappointing.
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)He's not the only one serious about pushing some lockstep, repeat-after-me weirdness either.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)calling for some lock step unity...like we are in Campaign 2016 Mode. It seems like derogatory name calling of some Dems about other Dems...and seems strange since the OP wants UNITY.
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)But name-calling or not, this lock-step support and quashing of dissent and criticism that is being demanded, which has been demanded by several since 2007, and before, is indeed scary.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Where did I write this "Blind Faith"?
"Criticism is forbidden" Where is that written?
Do you realize making stuff up is creepy? Then why do it?
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)It is clear what you're saying in your OP.
"OK, no more bashing Obama." < Criticism is forbidden.
"We stand at a time when party unity was never so important for our country and the world." < Blind faith/support.
"So my advice to all you who just love to stir the divisive stuff, is that you bury it for the next year, " < Obviously, since you fail to mention specifics, and in the context of your OP, "divisive" = critical, and this is a reiteration of the "don't criticize, support blindly" demands which permeate your OP.
We ain't all just here to baa on cue, you know.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I read your message as
""Screw the Democrats. I hate them. I will not support the party. They are all idiots.""
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)But your made up bs you can stick where the sun don't shine. Please.
Your message of "Screw the party" is a message of giving up. No wonder you are now running from that, eh?
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Oh, wait.
It turns out that we have to vote for someone else? Who knew?
He ain't running again. His only value is the policy he can bring on behalf of the public.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Then I may as well vote for more of this bullshit. Not like I have any real choice now.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)or is that just a coincidence? It seems like you're giving people the "my way or the highway" speech.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)laughing to this post.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)And say I'm in agreement with you. However - Republicans are doing something very very seductive in Hunterdon County NJ - our Congressman is one of the those whose head is on the chopping block for making the moves he did to help end the shut down . . .
They are proactively going after the affluent minority (including black Americans) vote in Hunterdon County NJ.
Two direct reach outs from them to our house hold.
I'm wondering if other DU'ers like me are getting these reach outs. . . . because it's awfully seductive to hear North Eastern Republicans who honor the affluence of our household yet totally slam and discount the wingnut fringe of their party and play on the glory days of the NJ Republican Machine that was inclusive to all Americans.
That's very interesting.
On one hand we have the far left wanting us to go awol on the Party until this, that or the other thing - and on the other hand Republicans are reaching out to a mixed race (black/white) high earning and wealth holding household in the North East and showing us what we have in common with our Congress Critter.
Now don't get me wrong - I'm voting against Lance. But it's pretty interesting the outreach from Moderate Republicans to what should be slam dunk for the Democratic Party.
And I'm sharing this because your right - if we want to take back the house - the far left can't let these folks seduce me. There others like me in Flemington NJ . . . And the NJ 7th is takeable if this TEA Party candidate folks are whispering about runs.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)OK!
Rah! Rah!
Shish boom bah!
Three big cheers for Obama!
Gooooooooooooooooo TEAM!3
yay!
TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)Nothing quite like a DU pogrom of liberals.