General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIF the oil that would flow through the Keystone pipeline is for US consumption...
Why are they piping it to the gulf of Mexico?
Build a fucking refinery in North Dakota.
GodlessBiker
(6,314 posts)world market, where anyone can buy it.
You can build a refinery in ND, but you still have to compete against China and others to first buy oil to be refined.
Or something like that.
liberal N proud
(60,338 posts)Piping it to the gulf is so it can be sold on the world market.
The oil industry is lobbying the public with the propaganda that the oil is for US consumption.
If they were truly trying to provide a supply for the US consumer, then build the refinery close to the source.
Just stop lying to us.
excuse not to write
(147 posts)indepat
(20,899 posts)stop.
pkdu
(3,977 posts)It is NOT for US consumption , its for Houston refineries then tankers out of the Gulf.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)infrastructure related to reshipment after refinement.
That would include using domestic pipelines and tankers taking refined petroleum gasoline to other ports by tanker.
If it was refined in ND how would it get to the mid west and the east coast? by truck ? by rail?
I am guessing that it is much much less expensive to transport the gas by tanker to NY from Texas by tanker than it is to have thousands of truck loads go by either surface or railroad.
liberal N proud
(60,338 posts)Answer, it won't because it is not for US consumption.
ellenfl
(8,660 posts)shipping it from nd or tx to landlocked states is all the same. btw, i understand that the tar sands in question would become diesel. do you use diesel fuel in your transportation? the ONLY reason for the pipeline is to get the oil to the global market.
ellen fl
Lochloosa
(16,066 posts)Key Facts on Keystone XL
Energy Security: Tar Sand will not Reduce Dependence on Foreign Oil
Keystone XL will not lessen U.S. dependence on foreign oil, but transport Canadian oil to American refineries for export to overseas markets.
Keystone XL is an export pipeline. According to presentations to investors, Gulf Coast refiners plan to refine the cheap Canadian crude supplied by the pipeline into diesel and other products for export to Europe and Latin America. Proceeds from these exports are earned tax-free. Much of the fuel refined from the pipelines heavy crude oil will never reach U.S. drivers tanks.
Reducing demand for oil is the best way to improve our energy security. U.S. demand for oil has been declining since 2007. New fuel-efficiency standards mean that this trend will continue once the economy gets back on track. In fact, the Energy Deptartment report on KeystoneXL found that decreasing demand through fuel efficiency is the only way to reduce mid-east oil imports with or without the pipeline.
More info:
http://www.tarsandsaction.org/spread-the-word/key-facts-keystone-xl/
grantcart
(53,061 posts)900,000 barrels of processed gasoline and petroleum products a day.
Question
1) do you believe that the crude and petroleum markets are indeed 'fungible' ?
2) where do you believe that the majority of refined products is going?
liberal N proud
(60,338 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)have absolutely no idea where our refined petroleum products go.
liberal N proud
(60,338 posts)They are told that if we build the pipeline, the oil will be used in the US.
It won't. The link at post 7 covers that.
Fungability is purely a notion conconted to allow one nations natural resources to be sold under the notion that by not having it to use here we will all convert to less energy consuming systems. Alternative energy systems are years from being feasable.
In the meantime, we are giving away the resources.
The notion that this pipeline will solve all our ills related to energy is a farce.
kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)I thought we'd fixed that.
slater71
(1,153 posts)This is what they will do with the Keystone oil.
http://money.cnn.com/2011/12/05/news/economy/gasoline_export/index.htm
liberal N proud
(60,338 posts)bhikkhu
(10,718 posts)So whatever quantity or wherever it goes, it does nothing much to bring the price of oil down. What it would do is direct more of the vast global oil revenue and jobs to North America, but in the long term even that is only really beneficial if the resources created are used to transition away from fossil fuels.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)eallen
(2,953 posts)You won't get a politician to admit it, but it matters less where your oil or gasoline originate, than where your shoes or cellphone were made.
Generally speaking, the oil companies prefer to expand existing refinery capacity to building new refineries. Existing sites have the pipelines, harbors, rail, infrastructure, and workforce in place. That said, a new refinery <i>is</i> being built in South (not North) Dakota.
And the only difference it makes whether it gets its crude from Canada, our Gulf, their Gulf, or elsewhere is how tankers are routed and pipelines are used. Logistics, nothing else.
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)Keystone XL is the second phase of an existing project, the segment of the Keystone project that delivers oil to refineries in the upper midwest is already in operation. Why the poutragers have only latched on to this project now is a mystery to me.
Devil_Fish
(1,664 posts)it's for the Oil Barrons.
liberal N proud
(60,338 posts)krispos42
(49,445 posts)Problem solved.