General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChina starts televising sunrise on giant TV screens because Beijing is so clouded in smog
Last edited Sat Jan 18, 2014, 11:38 AM - Edit history (1)
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11188605China starts televising sunrise due to smog
10:36 AM Saturday Jan 18, 2014
The smog has become so thick in Beijing that the city's natural light-starved masses have begun flocking to huge digital commercial television screens across the city to observe virtual sunrises.
The futuristic screens installed in the Chinese capital usually advertize tourist destinations, but as the season's first wave of extremely dangerous smog hit - residents donned air masks and left their homes to watch the only place where the sun would hail over the horizon that morning.
Commuters across Beijing found themselves cloaked in a thick, gray haze on Thursday as air pollution monitors issued a severe air warning and ordered the elderly and school children to stay indoors until the quality improved.
The air took on an acrid odor, and many of the city's commuters wore industrial strength face masks as they hurried to work.
--------------------------------
After the sunrise, clean air:
flying rabbit
(4,634 posts)marmar
(77,081 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Mexico City is supposed to be in a bad way itself in this hemisphere.
Don't know where the other hellholes are, I'm sure other cities are just as bad.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)went out to Riverside California and that is what it looked like there then.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Bill Maher used it as an example of how humans effect climate through stringent regulation. Thus it was caused by human action and relieved by human action.
I guess I lucked out and didn't see that, although I grew up in a city that only improved air quality from regulation, then it was changed. It's not the same kind of smog, but it's still not that good as far as air quality goes.
Where I live now, our worst problem is lack of winds when many are heating with wood. Too much particulates in the air. I wonder if they are using wood, oil or coal causing this very bad smog in China? Or if it's simply unreulated cars?
madokie
(51,076 posts)Not sure they use wood for heat but I'd bet they use oil and coal. I really don't know though
When I was spending time in Riverside during '68 and early '69 I never seen any thing like this but when I went back a few years later it was like I was in a whole different country, it was so different. Air quality wise that is.
I really liked that part of Ca, Riverside, San Berdu and Big Bear. It was great. Lots of good people there.
chrisa
(4,524 posts)All that this console needs is an ironic "paid for by (polluting company)" message on it.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)Looks like they need some anti-pollution laws.
Kaleva
(36,307 posts)Somebody in a higher up Chinese government position must be a fan of "Blade Runner".
freshwest
(53,661 posts)JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Brickbat
(19,339 posts)Not even a state-run sunrise -- a privatized, commercial sunrise! Awesome.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)She said that one time the visibility in Beijing was so bad, a plane bound for Beijing from Japan had to be sent back to Japan
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)I don't know what does.
karadax
(284 posts)A little diplomatic muscle in the form of a trade embargo would ease China into taking better care of its workers / citizens.
I can't help but think the US encourages their economic growth over environment priority.
As long as it's not in our backyard tho, right ?
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Taking care of Chinese ones is a long way down the priority list.
spanone
(135,841 posts)we don't need no stinking regulations.....
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)NYC, 1973:
Cleveland, 1973:
Romulox
(25,960 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)How much does that lack of sunshine and clean air contribute to depression, hopelessness,etc. ... not to mention all the physical problems. I don't know how they live with it, I know I couldn't.
onethatcares
(16,168 posts)reminiscent of the last scenes in Soylent Green?
Romulox
(25,960 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)China joined the WTO at the end of 2001. Russia (the last major country to join) joined in 2012.
From 2001 (the last year that trade with China was not governed by the WTO) we imported about $102 billion from China. In 2011 we imported about $399 billion. Our imports increased by a factor of 4.
In 2001 we imported about $6 from Russia. In 2011 (the last year before Russia joined the WTO) we imported about $34 billion. Our imports increased by a factor of almost 6.
Our imports from China are almost 12 times what they are from Russia (our exports to China are 12.5 times what our exports to Russia are) but China has 10 times the population that Russia has. In 2011 our trade with China was 78% imports and 22% exports, while our trade with Russia was 80% imports and 20% exports.
http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html
I am not sure you can make a case that not joining the WTO would have slowed down China's industrialization or trade growth or improved his environmental record. Not being in the WTO did slow down Russia's trade growth. I see not reason to believe that keeping China out of the WTO would have slowed it down any more than it did Russia.
What "non-centrist" policy would have prevented China's economic and trade growth and environmental damage? A Cuba-style trade embargo? That hardly sounds like a liberal policy proposal.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)doc03
(35,340 posts)laws then export it to China where they don't. Those pictures could be Pittsburgh back in the day but we had so many jobs
we couldn't fill them.
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)Newsjock
(11,733 posts)Over the weekend, a story that originated on the smut-ridden UK-based Daily Mail went viral among major media outlets across the world. Time, CBS, and the Huffington Post were among the dozens of online news media who published stories about Beijing residents flocking to giant TV screens to see fake sunrises during heavy pollution last week. Most of these stories were accompanied by the same photo of a massive TV screen in Tiananmen Square with a sunrise appearing on it.
In truth, that sunrise was probably on the screen for less than 10 seconds at a time, as it was part of an ad for tourism in Chinas Shandong province. The ad plays every day throughout the day all year round no matter how bad the pollution is. The photographer simply snapped the photo at the moment when the sunrise appeared. Look closely, and you can even see the Shandong tourism logo in the bottom right corner. The photo was credited to ChinaFotoPress via Getty Images, so a Daily Mail reporter did not take it.
... Yes, Beijing is polluted, as we at Tech in Asia have also been critical of, but this story is complete bullshit. International media should be embarrassed for not taking even a moment to second guess the Daily Mail, one of the least reputable news sources in the UK.