General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama Will End Mass Collection of Phone Data
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2014/01/17/obama_will_end_mass_collection_of_phone_data.htmlJanuary 17, 2014
Obama Will End Mass Collection of Phone Data
President Obama "said that the U.S. will end its mass collection of American phone data and no longer will house the information inside the government, a victory for civil libertarians that marks the most significant curtailment of U.S. surveillance practices in more than a decade," the Wall Street Journal reports.
"The most immediate changes to spy operations affect a National Security Agency program that collects data on nearly all U.S. phone calls. Under the new presidential directive, intelligence officials are now required to obtain an order from a secret national-security court for government searches of phone data, and the scope of individual searches has been scaled back."
Th1onein
(8,514 posts)They define "collection" a different way than normal people define it. They actually do collect the information, but only call it "collection" when they open it and read it.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Th1onein
(8,514 posts)Clapper went in front of Congress and explained this to us. "Collection" is defined as opening the book in the library, but he admitted, he's already got the library. They are collecting (real definition of the word) EVERYTHING. Is that okay with you? It's not okay with me, and it's violates the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable search and SEIZURE. YOU should be up in arms about this. Why aren't you?
Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)Since Snowden started the reveal, every one of the defenders has typed on this site until their fingers must nearly be bleeding that the collections only happen with a FISA court order, and they only access the information with another court order.
We all knew it was a lie, and I suspect this directive is going to be followed about as diligently, but at least we can stop pretending that everything is legal by the 4th Amend, we now know that it wasn't, and almost certainly isn't. The President just told us it wasn't.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)I hate do do this but....
I am about to channel a bit of the devil
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Or something
This was according to many on here. A few of them also assured me he would be caught, and when some disagreed, they were called naive by these former intelligence "insiders". Not naming names, you know who you are
former9thward
(32,025 posts)NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)at least when he got the Nobel Peace Prize, there was still a CHANCE he could have been telling the truth.
Anyone who believes this deserves to be as disappointed as they will be.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)from ACLU: "However, the presidents decision not to end bulk collection and retention of all Americans data remains highly troubling. The president outlined a process to study the issue further and appears open to alternatives. But the president should end not mend the governments collection and retention of all law-abiding Americans data. When the government collects and stores every Americans phone call data, it is engaging in a textbook example of an unreasonable search that violates the Constitution. The presidents own review panel recommended that bulk data collection be ended, and the president should accept that recommendation in its entirety.
https://www.aclu.org/national-security/aclu-comment-presidents-nsa-speech