Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 03:15 PM Jan 2014

Brian Schweitzer's Bitter, Bitter Enemies

Meet the group that waged war against Schweitzer, calling for his arrest and resignation as governor of Montana:

From wikipedia:



Western Tradition Partnership (WTP) -- which changed its name in 2010 to American Tradition Partnership (ATP), and spun off the 501(c)(3) Western Tradition Institute (WTI) -- is a radical anti-environmental organization linked to the law firm of Colorado's now-Secretary of State, Scott Gessler[1],[2].

The group is registered in Denver, Colorado.[3]

Mission

WTP/ATP bills itself as "a no-compromise grassroots organization dedicated to fighting the radical environmentalist agenda." The group promotes development of land, water and natural resources in the Rocky Mountain West and throughout the United States. It promotes free-market economics.[4] It says on its website that

Dozens of radical eco-organizations whose stated purpose is to dismantle the free enterprise system – and our Constitutionally protected rights – through so-called environmental protection have set their sights on robbing Americans of the right to exist, achieve and produce.[5]

History

One of ATP’s founders is former Montana Congressman Ron Marlenee, who served from 1977 until the state dropped from two House seats to one in 1992. Marlenee used his D.C. Rolodex to raise money for the fledgling pro-energy group, which registered in Colorado in 2008.[6]

ATP has joined tea party lobbying efforts, signing at least two letters to Congress in the last year urging an end to an end to tax credits for wind power and natural gas-fueled vehicles. The letters were signed by Koch-funded groups including Americans for Prosperity and tea party boosters FreedomWorks, Club for Growth and Art Pope’s John Locke Foundation[citation needed].

In its 2008 application for tax-exempt status as a 501(c)(4) “social welfare” organization, ATP listed its “primary donor” as Jacob Jabs, Colorado’s largest furniture retailer and a donor to Republican candidates and causes. Jabs pledged a $300,000 contribution to get ATP on its feet, according to IRS records obtained by the Center for Public Integrity[citation needed]. Jabs's spokeswoman said he did not make a donation and has "never heard of" ATP or the group's previous incarnation[citation needed]. Jabs also poured money into a failed “right to work” ballot initiative in Colorado, becoming a television spokesman for the 2008 anti-union effort[citation needed].
Controversies
Meth House Exposé

Pro Publica reported a bonanza of third-party, dark-money coordination with state candidates in Colorado and Montana that were found in a meth house in Colorado.[7] The boxes contained files for 23 candidates for state office. They also held fliers and questionnaires from outside spending groups. Western Tradition Partnership seemed to be pulling the strings, working with campaigns on strategy and surveys.

The documents were filed by Christian LeFer and many of the checks paid out by Western Tradition Partnership were signed by his wife, Allison.[8] The documents ultimately found in the meth house were taken from Allison LeFer's car, both the LeFers confirm. The records showed that checks written on WTP’s account and signed by Allison LeFer went to gun shows, for legal work and to LeFer’s printing company. She also signed a check for the group’s largest expenditure, a one-time transfer on Nov. 23, 2010, for $40,000 to “WTI.” This could refer to the Western Tradition Institute, the sister charity of WTP. Social welfare nonprofits like WTP are allowed to engage in some political activity, but IRS regulations say they must have social welfare as their primary purpose. Some of these 501(c)(4) nonprofits exploit gaps in enforcement between the IRS and election authorities so they don't have to disclose where they get their money.[9]

WTP had sought a protective injunction against the records’ release. Montana District Court Judge Jeffrey Sherlock wrote in a ruling that there is a “substantial relation between disclosure of this financial information and Montana’s stated constitutional interest in its citizen’s right to know.” Jacob Jabs, a furniture retailer in Colorado, was named by Western Tradition Partnership as a donor of $300,000. After this was made public, Jabs said "I did talk to Christian LeFer," Jabs said. "They basically admitted they used me to get their 501(c)(4) status."[10] He also told Pro Publica, "I think they just grabbed my name out of a hat to forward their agenda. I know nothing about the group, never heard of them, never have heard of them until the last few days, and I did not, absolutely did not, commit $300,000 to start this company." To further underscore this, he told The Bozeman Daily Chronicle, “I never, ever gave them a penny. It’s all crap. None of it is true. They’re using my name" without his knowledge or permission, Jabs said. “It’s a big scam.”[11]

The attorney general's office said that ATP was in "willful disobedience" of court orders to produce records as part of discovery in the case.[12] "I have never seen anyone stand in front of a judge and say his client's choice is not to obey that judge's orders, and furthermore to say they will continue to disobey the courts orders," said Assistant Attorney General Andy Huff. The state said documents still not produced by the group as ordered by the judge include organizational records, a list of board members, bylaws, meeting minutes and some communications. The state argues that ATP is not really a nonprofit, social welfare organization as it claims — and says it is really a front group to allow anonymous money to flow into the elections process. ATP attorney James Brown argues the court's order violates the group's constitutional speech and other rights. But he told Sherlock that ATP did not appeal prior orders to produce the records because it does not believe it would win in front of the Montana Supreme Court.

The night of Halloween, 2012, five days before the national election, there was a break-in at the Office of the Commissioner of Campaign Finances and Practices, where the meth house documents were stored.[13] Nothing was reported missing. Financial statements were due October 25 from nearly every candidate for political office in the state, resulting in piles of documents on desks and counters in the office in recent days. "It is hard to tell for sure [if anything was missing] because there are so many documents here in the office," political practices program supervisor Mary Baker said. The previous week, on October 22, there had been a break-in at the Helena campaign office of Attorney General Steve Bullock, who was then running for Governor. A laptop and $1,500 in campaign donations were taken.

A federal grand jury subpoenaed the documents to investigate illegal coordination, also citing the break-in as a need to keep the documents in a safe place.[14]
Breaking State Campaign Laws

An article in the October 22, 2010 Montana Missoulian reported that the Western Tradition Partnership broke state campaign laws when it mailed fliers attacking legislative candidates in the run-up to an election without registering as a political committee and publicly disclosing the source and disposition of its funds. A two-year investigation of the group uncovered a PowerPoint presentation created in 2010 that said the group planned to spend $537,000 on Montana elections that year. The state Commission of Political Practices said the group should pay civil penalties and face further investigation. [15]
2012 Political Activity
Citizens United and Campaign Finance

American Tradition Partnership was at the center of much political activity in 2012. Most prominently, the group helped the Supreme Court underscore their Citizens United decision by suing the state of Montana, overturning century-old campaign-finance disclosure laws. The U.S. Supreme Court upended and reversed Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Attorney General of Montana, a case where the Montana Supreme Court decided Citizens United did not apply to Montana's thorough campaign finance laws.[16]

In the federal court's 5-4 decision, the minority declared “Even if I were to accept Citizens United, this court’s legal conclusion should not bar the Montana Supreme Court’s finding, made on the record before it, that independent expenditures by corporations did in fact lead to corruption or the appearance of corruption in Montana. Given the history and political landscape in Montana, that court concluded that the state had a compelling interest in limiting independent expenditures by corporations,” said Justice Steven Breyer. He added, “Montana’s experience, like considerable experience elsewhere since the court’s decision in Citizens United, casts grave doubt on the court’s supposition that independent expenditures do not corrupt or appear to do so.”[17]

In the Montana court's 5-2 decision, writing for the majority, Chief Justice Mike McGrath noted a century ago "the state of Montana and its government were operating under a mere shell of legal authority, and the real social and political power was wielded by powerful corporate managers to further their own business interests. The voters had more than enough of the corrupt practices and heavy-handed influence asserted by the special interests controlling Montana’s political institutions.”[18]

Montana state attorneys think in challenging various campaign laws, American Tradition Partnership instead violated the laws.[19] Mike Black, an assistant attorney general defending the state against a lawsuit from ATP, said the state believes that ATP is a front for political money that wants to illegally hide its identity and spending activity. “We believe it was a sham from the beginning,” he notes. ATP has been fighting in court for two years against a state ruling that it is a political committee, and therefore must publicly report its campaign-related spending and financial donors.

American Tradition Partnership started a "newspaper" in 2012, The Montana Statesman. The paper ran front-page articles attacking state Attorney General Steve Bullock, who was prosecuting them while he was also running for Governor. It accused Bullock of failing to prosecute child molesters. Other stories attacked the state auditor, a Supreme Court candidate and the secretary of state.

.......................

So if this anti-environmentalist radical group is the bitter enemy of Brian Schweitzer, why are some Democrats characterizing Schweitzer as a radical anti-environmentalist?
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
2. Anti-environmentalists don't like him
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 05:51 PM
Jan 2014

Pro-Hillary's are already lining up to discredit him - I kind of like him already.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
3. yeah, this group is real whack-job stuff
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 05:53 PM
Jan 2014

They hate the current Democratic governor, too, and he is a true gem.

Steve Bullock.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
11. Seems like two good reasons to like him to me also. Don't know much about him yet, but the efforts
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:45 PM
Jan 2014

to discredit him are interesting enough for me to give him the benefit of the doubt, so far.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
5. They say
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 05:56 PM
Jan 2014

"So if this anti-environmentalist radical group is the bitter enemy of Brian Schweitzer, why are some Democrats characterizing Schweitzer as a radical anti-environmentalist?"

...Keystone is going to define Obama's environmental legacy, meaning destroy it. Now supporting Keystone isn't all that bad?

Murkowski pushes Obama on Keystone XL, crude-export ban

By Laura Barron-Lopez

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) wants President Obama to get on board with her push for lifting the U.S. ban on crude exports and approving the proposed Keystone XL pipeline.

In a letter sent to Obama on Tuesday, Murkowski called on the president to take executive action.

"While I believe you retain the executive authority necessary to lift the ban on crude exports, if you need legislative support from the Congress in order to do so, you will always have a willing partner from Alaska," Murkowski wrote in the letter on Tuesday.

Last week, she released a white paper on the benefits associated with expanding the country's energy trade, with a specific look at crude exports.

- more -

http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/195424-murkowski-pushes-obama-on-keystone-xl-crude-export-ban

The anti-Obama candidate:

Montana's Democratic governor slams ‘jackasses’ in DC for Keystone delay

By Ben Geman

Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer (D) is expressing frustration with the debate in Washington over the Keystone XL pipeline, which he strongly supports.

“Ninety per cent of these jackasses that are complaining about the Keystone pipeline in Washington, D.C., one year ago wouldn't have even known where the Keystone was. While we were doing the heavy lifting here in Montana and in South Dakota and in Kansas and Oklahoma ... in Washington, D.C. ... all these great defenders had never heard of Keystone before,” Schweitzer said in an interview published Thursday.

- more -

http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/212439-montana-gov-slams-anti-keystone-jackasses-in-dc


grasswire

(50,130 posts)
8. so you're cool with being in bed with radical anti-environmentalists assoc with Tea Party?
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:42 PM
Jan 2014

stupid game you are playing here.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
13. I don't know.
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:48 PM
Jan 2014

"Is Obama cool with Keystone?"

Schweitzer is upset he's delaying it. Still, does this mean Keystone is now cool?

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
15. Here's how we'll know if it's cool. If Obama decides he's cool with it, it will be cool. Until then
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:57 PM
Jan 2014

it's apparently 'iffy' whether or not it's cool.

I'm not cool with it, but what do I know? I wasn't cool with war crimes either, but we were told they were cool to move on from, so guess I was wrong ...

Cha

(297,741 posts)
17. It's called "deflect deflect deflect".. so they don't have to
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 07:02 PM
Jan 2014

address Schweitzer's love affair with Keystone. How they doin'? lol

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
10. Nothing says helping the environment like clean coal, fracking and the Keystone pipeline.
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:44 PM
Jan 2014
So if this anti-environmentalist radical group is the bitter enemy of Brian Schweitzer, why are some Democrats characterizing Schweitzer as a radical anti-environmentalist?

Well, largely because we are paying attention to what he says......
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Brian Schweitzer's Bitter...