Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
A deputy Chief of Staff is generally doing what the Chief of Staff wants done.
I don't get the media's take on this Christie thing as definitionaly limited to whatever Chris Christie says it is.
When a deputy chief of staff does something in an official capacity (like sending a message initiating a pre-planned crooked act) why would anyone assume, as a default position, that person was acting on their own initiative??
Perhaps she was... could be the case... but it isn't at all obvious.
