Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 06:18 PM Jan 2014

Last Month, Christie Complained to Cuomo That His Appointee Was Pressing Too Hard for Answers

We saw the press conference today and Christie was just shocked...shocked I tell you, that his staff was capable of lying to him about their involvement in the GWB scandal. So why was he twisting Cuomo's arm last month in an effort to keep this story quiet? If you don't believe Christie is involved in this, I've got a bridge to....

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie called New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo this week to complain about a Cuomo appointee's handling of a growing controversy over traffic pattern changes on the George Washington Bridge, a person familiar with the matter said.

Mr. Christie, a Republican, complained in a private phone call to Mr. Cuomo, a Democrat, that Patrick Foye, the executive director of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, was pressing too hard to get to the bottom of why the number of toll lanes onto the bridge from Fort Lee, N.J. was cut from three to one in early September, according to this person. The lane closures occurred without notice to local authorities, officials have said, and snarled traffic for a week in the small borough on the Hudson River bluffs.

Wall Street Journal
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Last Month, Christie Complained to Cuomo That His Appointee Was Pressing Too Hard for Answers (Original Post) Oilwellian Jan 2014 OP
Wow. dorkzilla Jan 2014 #1
And isn't it interesting... Oilwellian Jan 2014 #2
THAT actually occurred to me first! dorkzilla Jan 2014 #5
Who knows Oilwellian Jan 2014 #6
God I hope so. dorkzilla Jan 2014 #7
It may be because Murdoch doesn't like Christie, not conservative enough for him. George II Jan 2014 #11
Probably, but Roger "Giant Melting Vanilla Sundae" Ailes does..its probably Rupert's only outlet... dorkzilla Jan 2014 #12
The Murdoch Street Journal is either trying to taint Cuomo rocktivity Jan 2014 #24
WSJ reporting can be superb; its editorial page sucks mainer Jan 2014 #19
The editorial page is 100% RW garbage. jsr Jan 2014 #22
I agree. Business types have to know the real story to make decisions. bklyncowgirl Jan 2014 #25
Boy, just wait 'til the liberal media hears about this! Scuba Jan 2014 #3
Christy's bully-pity presser was for those Cha Jan 2014 #4
this is Exhibit #severalzillion for why pundits should not be confused with journalists renate Jan 2014 #8
He Knew. jsr Jan 2014 #9
Thanks oldandhappy Jan 2014 #10
Well, that tears it, then. Christie knew about the traffic situation prior to Dec. 12 rocktivity Jan 2014 #13
I don't think he's claiming he first heard of the traffic problems a couple days ago ... brett_jv Jan 2014 #14
But if he saw there were lane closures going on that he didn't know about rocktivity Jan 2014 #15
And since his staff was involved... Oilwellian Jan 2014 #18
Right, and that phone call will be his undoing because makes him a participant in the coverup rocktivity Jan 2014 #20
he knew. n/t spanone Jan 2014 #16
K&R proverbialwisdom Jan 2014 #17
Why doesn't this point to Christie's guilt? Cover Up? marias23 Jan 2014 #21
Christie is toast madokie Jan 2014 #23
More at the Christie Crime Digest rocktivity Jan 2016 #26

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
5. THAT actually occurred to me first!
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 06:43 PM
Jan 2014

I though "wait…the JOURNAL published this"??

I wonder if this has more to do with deliberately trying to taint Cuomo by association. I'm having a hard time thinking Murdoch's creature would bring this up unless it could hurt a Democrat in the bargain.

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
6. Who knows
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 06:54 PM
Jan 2014

But the call didn't stop Foye from testifying to the NJ Legislature. I imagine Cuomo busted out laughing after Christie's desperate phone call.

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
7. God I hope so.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 07:30 PM
Jan 2014

This is pride of point in my house. I'm a born and raised native New Yorker, but Mr. Dorky is from New Jersey. I finally got him to see the error of his ways and move to New York, but our play "arguments" are me attacking and he defending all things Jersey.

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
12. Probably, but Roger "Giant Melting Vanilla Sundae" Ailes does..its probably Rupert's only outlet...
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 04:42 PM
Jan 2014

…to dish on Christie and tell the world how he really feels about the Guvenah.

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
24. The Murdoch Street Journal is either trying to taint Cuomo
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 02:25 PM
Jan 2014

or assist the rest of the Rethug establishment in knocking Christie out of the 2016 presidential race.


rocktivity

mainer

(12,022 posts)
19. WSJ reporting can be superb; its editorial page sucks
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 04:05 PM
Jan 2014

WSJ reporters are very, very good at what they do.

bklyncowgirl

(7,960 posts)
25. I agree. Business types have to know the real story to make decisions.
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 02:31 PM
Jan 2014

Republicans in general love to live in Republican Fantasyland but business leaders, the type who read the WSJ want the truth, thank you because they have to understand what is really going on in order to capitalize on events and trends.

They may enjoy right wing propeganda as entertainment but they know better than to believe it.

Cha

(297,323 posts)
4. Christy's bully-pity presser was for those
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 06:37 PM
Jan 2014

suckers who eat that up.. no questions asked.

Thanks for the article, Oilwellian

renate

(13,776 posts)
8. this is Exhibit #severalzillion for why pundits should not be confused with journalists
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 07:38 PM
Jan 2014

"Gee, he seemed believable to me"

versus

"Let's review the facts."

From what I've read on CNN.com it sounds like their pet talking heads either believe him because "this was a very different Chris Christie" or are willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, because... well, I can't think of any valid reason that a journalist should just give somebody the benefit of the doubt because he looked sad. Thank goodness for Rachel et al--I can't wait for her show tonight.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
10. Thanks
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 09:55 PM
Jan 2014

Thank you for posting this. Once I saw your headline, I did sort of vaguely remember, smile. Wonder what else is out there!!??

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
13. Well, that tears it, then. Christie knew about the traffic situation prior to Dec. 12
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 12:50 AM
Jan 2014

Last edited Tue Jul 22, 2014, 07:55 PM - Edit history (2)

which is when he should have fired the staffers involved (not allowed them to resign), put the nomination of his chief of staff on hold, and called for a federal investigation himself.


rocktivity

brett_jv

(1,245 posts)
14. I don't think he's claiming he first heard of the traffic problems a couple days ago ...
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 03:08 PM
Jan 2014

Not even he would try to pull THAT big of a lie off.

I believe he's claiming that he only just recently discovered that people on his staff were 'involved'.

And he's sad. That's what he's feeling right now. You know, inside. It's sadness.

No, REALLY!

He's having a LOT ... of sadness.

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
15. But if he saw there were lane closures going on that he didn't know about
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 03:28 PM
Jan 2014

Last edited Mon Feb 10, 2014, 05:33 PM - Edit history (5)

why didn't he ask anyone, "Why are lane closures going on that I didn't know about? Who authorized it? AND WHO ALLOCATED HOW MUCH MONEY?" He didn't ask those questions BECAUSE HE ALREADY HAD THE ANSWERS!

And of COURSE his staff was involved. Who else could have authorized, produced, and set out those cones -- a college fraternity? A local street gang? A film crew?


rocktivity

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
18. And since his staff was involved...
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 03:50 PM
Jan 2014

it explains why he was trying to hush Mr. Foye. Christie knew and made a desperate phone call. It will be his undoing.

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
20. Right, and that phone call will be his undoing because makes him a participant in the coverup
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 04:26 PM
Jan 2014

Last edited Sun Jul 6, 2014, 02:31 AM - Edit history (2)

which is impeachable enough (ask Joe Paterno).

Nothing points to Governor Soprano as a conspirator or mastermind as of yet. But it's looking more and more like that's because he arranged it that way.


rocktivity

marias23

(379 posts)
21. Why doesn't this point to Christie's guilt? Cover Up?
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 09:51 AM
Jan 2014

I am guessing that Chrstie does not call other governors about investigations. Shows he was concerned with outcome and someone being discovered that he was not happy with. THE COVER UP.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
23. Christie is toast
Mon Jan 13, 2014, 10:09 AM
Jan 2014

burnt toast at that. He's the only one who doesn't realize it. He way over stepped his authority, no, he took advantage of his authority and its going to bite, no, it is biting him in his ASS

stupid is as stupid does

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Last Month, Christie Comp...