Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 03:34 PM Jan 2014

Texas charges controversial doctor with false ads

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/01/08/texas-charges-controversial-doctor-with-making-false-ads/4373163/

Texas medical authorities have filed new charges against a controversial Houston doctor who was the subject of a USA TODAY investigation.

In a complaint filed Dec. 11, the Texas Medical Board said Stanislaw Burzynski marketed his experimental cancer therapies online and in news releases in a way that is "false, misleading and violated federal law."

In a statement Wednesday, the Burzynski Clinic dismissed the charges as "frivolous," arguing that he has a constitutional right to make truthful statements about his research.

The charges are the latest attempt by Texas medical authorities to discipline Burzynski, 70, who has wrangled with the state board since the 1980s over his use of experimental drugs that he claims can cure certain cancers.

According to the National Cancer Institute, Burzynski has no definitive evidence to support his claims about the drugs, called antineoplastons, which are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration. According to the NCI, "no randomized, controlled trials showing the effectiveness of antineoplastons have been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals."



Burzynski is a medical quack, taking advantage of desperate people and raking in millions of dollars.


Orac's take on the whole thing here:
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2014/01/09/its-2014-and-stanislaw-burzynski-has-begun-his-counteroffensive/


Sid
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas charges controversial doctor with false ads (Original Post) SidDithers Jan 2014 OP
Fabio brought his sister from Italy for cancer treatment at the Burzynski Clinic. factsarenotfair Jan 2014 #1
Gorski has been a long-time, dogged critic of Burzynski... SidDithers Jan 2014 #2
The lesson: if you're going to defy federal law and endanger patients in Texas... Orsino Jan 2014 #3
you scientific materialist you....nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #4
Long live the claque!...nt SidDithers Jan 2014 #6
Antineoplastons, eh? MineralMan Jan 2014 #5
Yup, there's no there there... SidDithers Jan 2014 #7
And he's gotten away with it for a very long time, too. MineralMan Jan 2014 #8
This needs to happen more often. nt ProgressSaves Jan 2014 #9
If people's very lives were not at stake etherealtruth Jan 2014 #10
He's on Quackwatch jmowreader Jan 2014 #11

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
2. Gorski has been a long-time, dogged critic of Burzynski...
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 03:40 PM
Jan 2014

and with good reason. Burzynski is a crank of the highest order.

And Orac is always good.

Sid

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
3. The lesson: if you're going to defy federal law and endanger patients in Texas...
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 03:40 PM
Jan 2014

...be sure to get elected governor first.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
5. Antineoplastons, eh?
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 03:53 PM
Jan 2014

Let's look those up at a leading cancer website, shall we?

http://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatmentsandsideeffects/complementaryandalternativemedicine/pharmacologicalandbiologicaltreatment/antineoplaston-therapy


The OTA report criticized Burzynski's research process and noted that his definitions of advanced cancer and of complete and partial cancer remission were not used in accordance with generally accepted definitions. One example they pointed to was a patient said to have had a complete remission after treatment with antineoplastons. The report concluded that this claim was inappropriate because the cancer had been removed by surgery before the antineoplaston treatment was started.


Fairly well debunked at the link, I'd say.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
8. And he's gotten away with it for a very long time, too.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 05:08 PM
Jan 2014

Rooting out the quacks can be very difficult, especially the ones that are actual MDs.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
10. If people's very lives were not at stake
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 05:25 PM
Jan 2014

I would say: A fool and his money are soon parted.

Peoples lives are at stake with every outright lie ... every anecdotal story.

for God sake ... seek competent treatment ... or seek no treatment (and at least save your money).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Texas charges controversi...