Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTexas charges controversial doctor with false ads
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/01/08/texas-charges-controversial-doctor-with-making-false-ads/4373163/Texas medical authorities have filed new charges against a controversial Houston doctor who was the subject of a USA TODAY investigation.
In a complaint filed Dec. 11, the Texas Medical Board said Stanislaw Burzynski marketed his experimental cancer therapies online and in news releases in a way that is "false, misleading and violated federal law."
In a statement Wednesday, the Burzynski Clinic dismissed the charges as "frivolous," arguing that he has a constitutional right to make truthful statements about his research.
The charges are the latest attempt by Texas medical authorities to discipline Burzynski, 70, who has wrangled with the state board since the 1980s over his use of experimental drugs that he claims can cure certain cancers.
According to the National Cancer Institute, Burzynski has no definitive evidence to support his claims about the drugs, called antineoplastons, which are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration. According to the NCI, "no randomized, controlled trials showing the effectiveness of antineoplastons have been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals."
In a complaint filed Dec. 11, the Texas Medical Board said Stanislaw Burzynski marketed his experimental cancer therapies online and in news releases in a way that is "false, misleading and violated federal law."
In a statement Wednesday, the Burzynski Clinic dismissed the charges as "frivolous," arguing that he has a constitutional right to make truthful statements about his research.
The charges are the latest attempt by Texas medical authorities to discipline Burzynski, 70, who has wrangled with the state board since the 1980s over his use of experimental drugs that he claims can cure certain cancers.
According to the National Cancer Institute, Burzynski has no definitive evidence to support his claims about the drugs, called antineoplastons, which are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration. According to the NCI, "no randomized, controlled trials showing the effectiveness of antineoplastons have been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals."
Burzynski is a medical quack, taking advantage of desperate people and raking in millions of dollars.
Orac's take on the whole thing here:
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2014/01/09/its-2014-and-stanislaw-burzynski-has-begun-his-counteroffensive/
Sid
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 1746 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas charges controversial doctor with false ads (Original Post)
SidDithers
Jan 2014
OP
Fabio brought his sister from Italy for cancer treatment at the Burzynski Clinic.
factsarenotfair
Jan 2014
#1
factsarenotfair
(910 posts)1. Fabio brought his sister from Italy for cancer treatment at the Burzynski Clinic.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)2. Gorski has been a long-time, dogged critic of Burzynski...
and with good reason. Burzynski is a crank of the highest order.
And Orac is always good.
Sid
Orsino
(37,428 posts)3. The lesson: if you're going to defy federal law and endanger patients in Texas...
...be sure to get elected governor first.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)4. you scientific materialist you....nt
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)6. Long live the claque!...nt
Sid
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)5. Antineoplastons, eh?
Let's look those up at a leading cancer website, shall we?
http://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatmentsandsideeffects/complementaryandalternativemedicine/pharmacologicalandbiologicaltreatment/antineoplaston-therapy
The OTA report criticized Burzynski's research process and noted that his definitions of advanced cancer and of complete and partial cancer remission were not used in accordance with generally accepted definitions. One example they pointed to was a patient said to have had a complete remission after treatment with antineoplastons. The report concluded that this claim was inappropriate because the cancer had been removed by surgery before the antineoplaston treatment was started.
Fairly well debunked at the link, I'd say.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)7. Yup, there's no there there...
And Burzynski charges tens of thousands of dollars for treatments.
Sid
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)8. And he's gotten away with it for a very long time, too.
Rooting out the quacks can be very difficult, especially the ones that are actual MDs.
ProgressSaves
(123 posts)9. This needs to happen more often. nt
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)10. If people's very lives were not at stake
I would say: A fool and his money are soon parted.
Peoples lives are at stake with every outright lie ... every anecdotal story.
for God sake ... seek competent treatment ... or seek no treatment (and at least save your money).
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)11. He's on Quackwatch