General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf you thought the War on Drugs is waste, this is worse:
Santorum: I Will Ban PornographyRick Santorum said yesterday that if elected he will appoint an Attorney General who will vigorously enforce existing obscenity laws.
The former Pennsylvania senator argues that "current federal 'obscenity' laws prohibit distribution of hardcore [obscene] pornography on the Internet, on cable/satellite TV, on hotel/motel TV, in retail shops and through the mail or by common carrier." The Obama administration has turned a blind eye to those who wish to preserve our culture from the scourge of pornography and has refused to enforce obscenity laws, the statement read in part. While the Obama Department of Justice seems to favor pornographers over children and families, that will change under a Santorum administration.
Santorum's website declares that porn causes brain damage: "A wealth of research is now available demonstrating that pornography causes profound brain changes in both children and adults, resulting in widespread negative consequences."
http://www.joemygod.blogspot.com/
Hey Little Ricky! POTUS doesn't stand for 'Puritan Of The US!'
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Because he sure can't get sexual images of man on dog stuff out of his mind. He's into inter-species porn which he thinks is OK because watching naked women's stuff is very disturbing to him. I'm sure he does it with his eyes closed tightly like it should be done.
AllyCat
(16,216 posts)Whenever people in power say they are going on a crusade against pornography, I start wondering even more what they are really up to in their spare time.
Brain Damage? That's a lot of research from people who don't like science.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)I cannot remember that late, great liberal Democrat Tip O'Neill ever going on an anti-porn crusade.
AllyCat
(16,216 posts)DocMac
(1,628 posts)Thats when the torches and pitchforks break out.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)So is it OK with gawd if little pRicky goes around making shit up?
aikoaiko
(34,183 posts)Posturing. Its half the game
lame54
(35,315 posts)Don't Shake His Hand - Yeccch
madmom
(9,681 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)randr
(12,414 posts)This will enrage his porn lovin crowd.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)Then maybe you can stop sniffing our crotches.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Enough is enough.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Do you feel like you're living in a bad, dystopian B movie?
America desperately needs a good Constitutional shower to wash the fascists out.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Sadly, there are still small cliques of authoritarian-minded so-called "progressives" who are all too willing to quote these bogus studies (funded by progressive pro-womyn outfits like the American Family Assoc., no less) in the pursuit of their anti-porn, pro-censorship agenda.
Give this thread some time, you'll see a few "but but but but but butbutbutbut pornn harmmmmsss!!! folks show up, now with newfound "respect" for Sticky Ricky's "principles" no doubt.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)One of the weirdest and most disturbing political alliances I ever saw was that between the talibangelicals and the MacKinnon/Dworkin crowd when the latter were trying to pass their insane porn ordinance back here in Minneapolis in the mid-1980s.
The only possible conclusion to be drawn from that was the so-called "feminists" were as repressed, prudish, anti-sex and generally psychologically messed up as the religulously insane god-botherers.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I think a lot of it is religious guilt and fundamentalism rebranded or sublimated.