Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFunds With $100 Billion May Be Too Big to Fail, FSB Says
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-08/funds-with-100-billion-may-be-too-big-to-fail-fsb-says.htmlInvestment funds that manage more than $100 billion in assets may be labeled too big to fail, global regulators said, as they seek to expand financial safeguards beyond banks and insurers.
Hedge funds with trading activities exceeding a set value of $400 billion to $600 billion would also be assessed by national authorities to gauge whether they need extra rules because their collapse could spark a crisis, the Financial Stability Board said in a statement yesterday.
The report addresses the risks to global financial stability and economic stability posed by the disorderly failure of financial institutions other than banks and insurers, Mark Carney, Bank of England governor and FSB chairman, said in the statement. They are integral to solving the problem of financial institutions that are too big to fail.
The FSB, which brings together regulators and central bankers from the Group of 20 nations, is ranking banks and insurers by their potential to cause a global meltdown and demanding bigger financial cushions to avert a repeat of the 2008 credit freeze. Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd., the worlds most profitable lender, was added to the FSBs list of too-big-to-fail banks in November. Insurers such as American International Group Inc. and Allianz SE were deemed systemically important in July.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 561 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Funds With $100 Billion May Be Too Big to Fail, FSB Says (Original Post)
xchrom
Jan 2014
OP
Okay fine, but I don't want to hear the leaders of industry prattle on about capitalism
Rex
Jan 2014
#1
So, the same people who allowed these parasites to screw everyone over are going to assess
Buns_of_Fire
Jan 2014
#3
Rex
(65,616 posts)1. Okay fine, but I don't want to hear the leaders of industry prattle on about capitalism
and free enterprise when they don't practice or believe in it anymore. So 100 billion is the cap on immunity of corporate malfeasance, how wonderful!
Buns_of_Fire
(17,183 posts)3. So, the same people who allowed these parasites to screw everyone over are going to assess
whether or not said parasites need new rules? Sounds like a winning strategy to me!
hughee99
(16,113 posts)4. See, they're planning ahead.
The next time the bankers fuck it all up, they'll quickly know who needs the bailout and how much.