Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TheOther95Percent

(1,035 posts)
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:47 AM Jan 2014

"He's not going to fire her before he's assured she's going to back him up."

That was the gist of what Lawrence O'Donnell said in an exchange with Steve Schmidt about why Christie hasn't fired the deputy chief on his staff at the center of today's email releases. Steve Schmidt looked, quite frankly, shocked. He didn't argue with O'Donnell. What's the only explanation - in light of the damning admissions revealed in the staffer's written exchanges with Christie's own appointee to the Port Authority. This governor has bellowed about his ability to take decisive action. He even said "heads will roll." Well, what the fuck is he waiting for? Bridget Ann Kelly should have been fired on the spot. That she hasn't been is very telling.

I also cannot believe that once the story line about the non-existent traffic study came to light that he accepted no one in his administration had anything to do with it. Christie is a former prosecutor and should be able to determine where there is smoke, there is also fire. He looked the other way.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"He's not going to fire her before he's assured she's going to back him up." (Original Post) TheOther95Percent Jan 2014 OP
Can Bridget Kelly bet that her fabrications can't be disproven? immoderate Jan 2014 #1
If you think you are above the law... rustydog Jan 2014 #2
I think this is his "I'm not a crook" moment. TheOther95Percent Jan 2014 #6
"back him up"?! Bridget Kelly is Toxic.. it looks Cha Jan 2014 #3
Does she have pictures? greatlaurel Jan 2014 #4
I wonder if Christie calls her 'Bridge' for short... Whisp Jan 2014 #5
Oh, SNAP. That's a DUZY TheOther95Percent Jan 2014 #7
Good one. Another DUzy nom. nt Kahuna Jan 2014 #9
They're probably working on giving her another high-paying job to reward her compliance. jsr Jan 2014 #8
Link? riqster Jan 2014 #10
That Was A Selective Release Of E-Mails... Laxman Jan 2014 #11
 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
1. Can Bridget Kelly bet that her fabrications can't be disproven?
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:56 AM
Jan 2014

Will she do her time alongside Christie?

--imm


rustydog

(9,186 posts)
2. If you think you are above the law...
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 01:02 AM
Jan 2014

You have a "I am not a crook" moment
Or a: "I was humping, hiking the Appalachian trail" moment

And your career slowly slinks under the horizon

TheOther95Percent

(1,035 posts)
6. I think this is his "I'm not a crook" moment.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 01:15 AM
Jan 2014

I came of age watching the House investigation into Watergate. This has more of the flavor of a third rate burglary than a "I was cheating on my spouse" taste to it.

Cha

(297,323 posts)
3. "back him up"?! Bridget Kelly is Toxic.. it looks
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 01:03 AM
Jan 2014

like she started the whole vengeance with or without Christie's go ahead.

Laxman

(2,419 posts)
11. That Was A Selective Release Of E-Mails...
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 09:51 AM
Jan 2014

with all of the redactions and the missing names, her message is the one released making it look like it originated with her. There is no way this was her idea. She may have been the messenger, but this was per-meditated from the Christie leadership, both the campaign side and the administrative side. The fact that the two were too closely coordinated may be a real problem as well.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"He's not going to f...