Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,996 posts)
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 07:51 PM Mar 2012

Rick Santorum Now Coming for Your Porn

From RickSantorum.com:

Current federal “obscenity” laws prohibit distribution of hardcore (obscene) pornography on the Internet, on cable/satellite TV, on hotel/motel TV, in retail shops and through the mail or by common carrier. Rick Santorum believes that federal obscenity laws should be vigorously enforced. “If elected President, I will appoint an Attorney General who will do so.”

The Obama Administration has turned a blind eye to those who wish to preserve our culture from the scourge of pornography and has refused to enforce obscenity laws. While the Obama Department of Justice seems to favor pornographers over children and families, that will change under a Santorum Administration.

http://www.ricksantorum.com/enforcing-laws-against-illegal-pornography
http://wonkette.com/467148/rick-santorum-now-coming-for-your-porn
http://www.calamitiesofnature.com/archive/?c=550

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rick Santorum Now Coming for Your Porn (Original Post) kpete Mar 2012 OP
Nicely worded headline..... trusty elf Mar 2012 #1
What a greedy bastard. BlueToTheBone Mar 2012 #2
How is this gonna create jobs? Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #3
The new Department of Pornography will have lots of jobs :) pinboy3niner Mar 2012 #5
Who is going to have look for all that pornography on the internet? Dah. LisaL Mar 2012 #14
"Obama Administration Turns Blind Eye Towards Pornography" longship Mar 2012 #4
they might want to look at Santorum's computer hard drives then? Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2012 #6
DUZY!!! Classic. Now Santorum will be frothy AND STICKY!! madinmaryland Mar 2012 #7
He's gonna lose a lot of teabaggers with that statement Cirque du So-What Mar 2012 #8
State of Ca ain't going to be too happy either. LisaL Mar 2012 #15
nah. They'll jump on the bandwagon... nickinSTL Mar 2012 #16
And he'll have to see all the porn himself The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2012 #9
Big Brother, Rick RobertEarl Mar 2012 #10
What's with Ricky Man-on-Dog's obsession with other people's sex lives? PA Democrat Mar 2012 #11
Rick SanTaliban strikes again. neverforget Mar 2012 #12
Damn, it almost makes me wish I had some porn! rufus dog Mar 2012 #13
And he is outta here!!! Initech Mar 2012 #17
I'm afraid Ricky will have to pry my porn from my dead, Santorum covered fingers. mysuzuki2 Mar 2012 #18
Wait, you can get porn on the internet?? Poiuyt Mar 2012 #19
I wonder how he feels about all those gentlemens' clubs down south?? Angry Dragon Mar 2012 #20
FROM MY COLD, CRAMPED HAND! nt Gidney N Cloyd Mar 2012 #21
He has a point with this. I think there IS a huge problem with internet porn. Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #22
It's a problem only if there are kids involved, or The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2012 #23
It's a problem, IMO. More & more crimes are being associated with it. Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #26
But how can you regulate it, and who decides where to draw the line? The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2012 #27
Oh, and I'm no prude. But I think there is a problem. Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #28
fine. I will continue to think dirty thoughts provis99 Mar 2012 #24
The wisdom of Hank Hill Mopar151 Mar 2012 #25

longship

(40,416 posts)
4. "Obama Administration Turns Blind Eye Towards Pornography"
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 07:59 PM
Mar 2012

Headline writes itself.

Or how about this one:

"Santorum Campaign Has Eye on Hard-Core Pornography"


Cirque du So-What

(25,941 posts)
8. He's gonna lose a lot of teabaggers with that statement
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 08:14 PM
Mar 2012

They're some of that genre's biggest aficionados.

nickinSTL

(4,833 posts)
16. nah. They'll jump on the bandwagon...
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 09:26 PM
Mar 2012

they'll love the idea that they're being seen as fighting obscenity, while simultaneously buying porn illegally (if Santorum had his way).

Those who are rich enough, the government won't touch, others...well, they'll do their best to hide it while railing against the evils of the porn industry and how it corrupts our nation's morals.

Hypocrites.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
10. Big Brother, Rick
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 09:01 PM
Mar 2012

He is actually wanting to pry into the people's private lives and decide for them what they can and can't see?
That goes against what the old GOP was for. They were for less government.

PA Democrat

(13,225 posts)
11. What's with Ricky Man-on-Dog's obsession with other people's sex lives?
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 09:06 PM
Mar 2012

Is he afraid everyone else is having more fun than he is?

neverforget

(9,436 posts)
12. Rick SanTaliban strikes again.
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 09:14 PM
Mar 2012

Bringing Christian Theocracy to America one stupid idea after another.

 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
13. Damn, it almost makes me wish I had some porn!
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 09:24 PM
Mar 2012

Anyone have any Dog on Man porn to share?

Nevermind, hard enough for the Rufus Dog to type with paws, typing with one paw is beyond any reasonable expectations.

Initech

(100,080 posts)
17. And he is outta here!!!
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 09:30 PM
Mar 2012

Thanks for playing Rick - we have some great parting gifts for like the all expenses paid trip to Afghanistan where he'll meet a great group of like minded individuals.

mysuzuki2

(3,521 posts)
18. I'm afraid Ricky will have to pry my porn from my dead, Santorum covered fingers.
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 09:34 PM
Mar 2012

metaphorically speaking.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
22. He has a point with this. I think there IS a huge problem with internet porn.
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 10:09 PM
Mar 2012

I hate to say it, but I think he has a good point.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,733 posts)
23. It's a problem only if there are kids involved, or
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 10:44 PM
Mar 2012

if people are somehow forced into doing porn. If not, who cares what other people look at on the Internet? It grosses me out a bit, but nobody is making me look so it's not my concern. And it shouldn't be the government's concern, either.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
26. It's a problem, IMO. More & more crimes are being associated with it.
Fri Mar 16, 2012, 11:07 PM
Mar 2012

I know of a person married to someone...the internet porn started him into a downward spiral of crime and deception. The porn on the internet is different from other forms. I don't understand why, but it is. And men can't seem to control themselves, when confronted with it. There are laws against porn in other media, yet for the internet, there don't seem to be effective laws keeping it confined.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,733 posts)
27. But how can you regulate it, and who decides where to draw the line?
Fri Mar 16, 2012, 11:33 PM
Mar 2012

Porn isn't considered protected speech, so it can be (and is) regulated, but you still have to decided what is and isn't pornographic. The Supreme Court went through that analysis years ago, and found it pretty hard (if you'll excuse the expression) to define it, except to say "I know it when I see it." One man's harmless titillation may be another man's hard-core smut. The man whose porn habit led him to a life of crime probably had some serious problems that were not caused by looking at dirty pictures - more likely, the porn habit was a symptom of his problems. If he wasn't looking at internet porn he probably would have been doing some other weird, dysfunctional and possibly criminal things.

To be clear, I'm not a fan of porn; I think it ranges from silly to extremely creepy and it doesn't do a damn thing for me. But I have some real problems with prohibiting other people from looking at images that were created by consenting adults and don't involve injury to anyone (human or animal). If porn-watchers are motivated to act out, they have other problems that need to be dealt with. The Internet is pretty uncontrollable as a practical matter. In order to prevent people from looking at porn on their computer the government would have to have access to their ISP records, and I'm not too happy about that idea.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
28. Oh, and I'm no prude. But I think there is a problem.
Sat Mar 17, 2012, 08:10 AM
Mar 2012

It will have to be dealt with sooner or later. How you'd control it, I don't know. It's for better minds than mind to figure that one out. But that used to be said about other forms of porn, too.

The gambling online, too, although it's addictive in the other forms, too. I think the gambling online is regulated somewhat, but I'm not sure how, I read where some people were arrested and sites shut down for gambling.

I'm not sure which comes first: the porn which escalates to other things, or the person with issues who locks into the porn as an easy outlet which escalates.

The guy I know of: Educated, IT man working for big employer, married to religious woman with two children one of whom is autistic. They had a nice house, two nice cars, a nice little family. Or so the wife thought. He starts in on the porn. It escalates to a level you wouldn't believe. Tens of thousands of dollars in debt, which he goes to extremes to hide from the wife. He starts stealing equipment from his employer to pay for more porn. The garage has hidden in it all sorts of printed out porn pics from the internet, and other porn. The feds raid...mixed in with the porn is child porn. I'm told it's unavoidable to get into internet porn heavily w/o downloading some child porn. His computer is confiscated, etc. He gets probation. But the porn thing continues. The wife needs help with teh autistic child and wants to "stand by her man." He is fired from his job but eventually gets another job at.....a school district. After being arrested with child porn. That's because it wasn't on his record. It's just porn. He steals cash from new employer. The problem escalates to an unimaginable point, as he ultimately gets the family into debt of a couple of hundred thousand dollars. The garage gets filled up again. Wife doesn't know what to do (she doesn't know about the stealing). After losing his job, he started a business and rented an office somewhere. It turned out to be a front for his porn addiction. It held his stolen goods and tons of his porn, when it was raided.

I would've kicked the guy out ages ago, but she didn't. So she ends up with a hubby convicted of felony theft, a ruined career, facing decades in prison, a garage full of porn, missing a car (he sold one of the cars to get cash), hundreds of thousands of debt (he'd second mortgaged the house). You get the picture.

Two men at my office: One was asked to leave, partly because he kept porn on his pc all day. His computer faced his office door, which faced the hall. When anyone passed his office, they could see pics of naked women staring at them in the hallway. He couldn't stop. All day long, he'd sit in front of his pc staring at porn. Another attorney, too. On his pc all the time. It got to where he stopped trying to hide it from his secretary when she came in. Consider that it was costing these attorneys a lot of money, both in accessing it, and the loss of business from clients. I can only guess that they just couldn't stop. It was so handy, right there in front of them, on their pc, which they have to use all day, anyway.

I guess it's like trying to stop smoking while holding a pack of cigarettes all day. The internet porn is a special problem. It involves not just the viewer.

 

provis99

(13,062 posts)
24. fine. I will continue to think dirty thoughts
Fri Mar 16, 2012, 12:05 AM
Mar 2012

whether there is porn or not. And frankly, my imaginative mind is able to come up with more obscene images than mainstream porn does, Ricky boy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rick Santorum Now Coming ...